Re: How did Einstein get published?
- From: "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:39:45 GMT
"Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1190902558.171249.108870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I'm really thinking about Androcles as I write this,
That makes you either a saint or a machochist.
but I invite all of the anti-Einsteinians to contribute.
(You know you will anyway. You're here because
you couldn't resist the title.)
Good one :-)
Androcles in particular believes that Einstein's 1905
SR paper is full of nonsensical statements and
elementary errors that any child should catch. Yet
we have the indisputable fact that the version of the
paper we know was accepted and published in
Annalen der Physik, one of the premier physics
journals of the day.
So I invite you to imagine what the editorial process
was. How did a paper with such obvious errors end
up being blessed by the editors and referees and
published in a research journal?
Secret conspirary, set up and financed by the Joint
Committee of Patent Holders of the Bern Office.
I freely admit that my hope is to see a whole bunch
of wacky statements in one place. Hopefully both
sides will get plenty of amusement from the exchange.
Yes.
Can't wait!
Dirk Vdm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How did Einstein get published?
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: How did Einstein get published?
- References:
- How did Einstein get published?
- From: Randy Poe
- How did Einstein get published?
- Prev by Date: Re: Examining g0i
- Next by Date: Re: How did Einstein get published?
- Previous by thread: How did Einstein get published?
- Next by thread: Re: How did Einstein get published?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|