Re: How did Einstein get published?
- From: "JM Albuquerque" <jmDOTa2@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:33:54 +0100
"Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu na mensagem
news:1190902558.171249.108870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
So I invite you to imagine what the editorial process
was. How did a paper with such obvious errors end
up being blessed by the editors and referees and
published in a research journal?
Easy.
By the time (1905) there was a lot of practial and
actual problems that need to be solved.
All of them depend on the light speed and how
such problems should be presented and understood,
since light takes time to travel.
And Einstein get it perfectly.
There are a set of typical and limited problems that
can be perfectly understood by means of relativity.
The evolution pos-Einstein, taken be those who
couldn't understand the limitation of the theory,
somehow created all this mess.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How did Einstein get published?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: How did Einstein get published?
- From: Dono
- Re: How did Einstein get published?
- References:
- How did Einstein get published?
- From: Randy Poe
- How did Einstein get published?
- Prev by Date: Re: Time can be described without duration and succession
- Next by Date: Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
- Previous by thread: Re: How did Einstein get published?
- Next by thread: Re: How did Einstein get published?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
