Re: johnreed-Math and Universe, Part 5, September 27, 2007



On Sep 27, 5:53 pm, "Bill Hobba" <rubb...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
"johnlawrencereedjr" <randama...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:1190936470.995562.170120@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





The Universe and the Mathematics:
Why They Are So Well Matched
Take 1A - Modified September 27, 2007
John Lawrence Reed, Jr.

Part 5 of: "Why the Mathematics Works So Well On the Universe"

Fortunately, many, many years ago, during one of my unrelenting,
contemplative sessions on the mathematics and the operation of the
stable systems in the universe, I found and retained, the "precise"
rational intellectual framework I sought. In one illuminating insight,
that accompanied what I remember as a sudden spring like release of
torqued tension on my brain, I had the answer to the dilemma
articulated by Eugene Wigner, and I had the object of my long sought
for "common thread" that runs through all our physical laws. Galileo
may have been the first to formally assert that, "...the laws of
nature are written in the language of mathematics." Today we may
elaborate: stability in the field requires economy in cyclic motion.

Your definition of exactly what you mean, and justification, would be
illuminating.

Rest snipped.

Thanks
Bill- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Howdy Bill>
Havn't heard from you in a while. Glad your still around. You snipped
the best part though... It's about why the math works so well on the
universe... This is my permanent storage facility. You can reference
Parts 1 through 4 to get a kinda' good idea of where I am coming
from... and maybe an idea of where I'm going if you try. Always
appreciate your comments.
Have a good time.
johnreed

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: johnreed-Math and Universe, Part 5, September 27, 2007
    ... "Why the Mathematics Works So Well On the Universe" ... In one illuminating insight, ... for "common thread" that runs through all our physical laws. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
    ... Mathematics in the abstract has no empirical references. ... >maths only evolve according to physical laws. ... Not in the physical universe; ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
    ... Mathematics in the abstract has no empirical references. ... >maths only evolve according to physical laws. ... Not in the physical universe; ...
    (sci.cognitive)
  • Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
    ... Mathematics in the abstract has no empirical references. ... >maths only evolve according to physical laws. ... Not in the physical universe; ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Release of RosAsm V.2.025a
    ... > My brain is to small to understand a "multiverse". ... "multiverse" is that one theory suggests that black holes / ... white holes possibly "pinch off" parts of the universe which then expand ... the next point is that mathematics is independent and ...
    (alt.lang.asm)