Re: E = mc˛ ... 102nd birthday of a well covered up plagiarism by the Einstein Retard
- From: "Pmb" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 08:15:01 -0400
"kem" <kem.cookal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1190981115.243198.287390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sep 28, 11:23 am, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 26, 4:08 pm, "Pmb" <some...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times" wrote:
E = mc² stolen from Henri Poincaré
I disagree regarding Poincaré. [...]
I also disagree that the following equation has been properly derived.
E = m' c^2
Where
** E = Observed energy
** m' = Observed mass
In flat space,
m' = m / sqrt(1 - v^2 / c^2)
In curved spacetime according to GR,
m' = m sqrt(1 - 2 U) / sqrt(1 - v^2 / c^2)
That is until yours truly have shown so.
In 1952, Herbert Ives claimed that Einstein's first development of E =
mc^2
was circular, [...]
Einstein's derivation of (E = m c^2) is not only circular but also
wrong. It is all in his 1905 paper. <shrug>
The first in the list the author gives regarding the history of the
mass-energy relation is J.J. Thompson in 1885.
Whatever one assigns mass to energy or energy to mass, today, there
seem to be not too many physicists equating the negative energy of
Dark Energy as negative mass density in vacuum. Talking about
inconsistency to the maximum. <shrug>
Curved space stolen from Riemann
I disagree. The intrinsic curvature of mathematical spaces is to be
attributed to Riemann. However it was a few others who applied this
mathematics to spacetime. Nobody ever took anything away from Riemann.
Big deal! Riemann's curvature of space covers 3 dimensions. The
Goettingen group including Hilbert, Minkowski, Schwarzschild, and
Klein but no Einstein extended to 4 dimensions including time. You
are not giving Riemann enough credit. <shrug> Don't forget that
Riemann was also the first to suggest gravity as a manifestation of
curvature in space.
Space-time concept stolen from Minkowski, his math professor and from
same he stole as well the Tensor Calculus
I disagree. The concept of spacetime has been and always will be
attributed
to Minkowski. And it wasn't Minkowski who invented tensors. A reliable
source (a math professor aquantaince of mine) agrees with me when I tell
you
that it was Riemann who invented tensors.
The metric is merely a matrix. Riemann knew this. I think
Christoffel also knew this, but by the time of Ricci, the nonsense of
the metric being a tensor has utterly screwed up. <shrug>
Constant of the speed of light stolen from Lorentz
Do you mean that value of the speed of light or the invariance of the
speed
of light. In either case please provide proof or a reference to material
which proves this.
Voigt was the first to suggest constancy in the speed of light instead
of constancy in the wavelength to explain the null results of the MMX.
How does a constant value of the speed of light or the invariance in
the speed of light affect the mathematics involved?
This is Poincaré who wrote in 1904 that absolute movement is not
detectable.
So? Einstein said that the laws of physics are the same in all inertial
frames. This was postulated before Eistein but Einstein really took it
and
went off and explained the implications of it.
Well, if you mean the principle of relativity, it was discussed more
than 300 years ago by Galileo not Einstein.
Hence it has Einstein's name
attached to it. The principle of relativity is sure not knew. Even
Newton
knew of this theory but only with respect to the equations of mechanics.
This is a crock of bullsh*t.
This is Poincaré too who created the concept of relativity in 1904
then ( following that E = mc² discovery )
That story further of the clocks lagging in time is stolen from
Larmor
I recommend you get an historical text such as that by Jammer before you
continue with these accusations.
True. Poincare did not invent the concept of relativity. It was
Galileo who did it. However, it was Larmor who first came up with the
Lorentz transform not Einstein, not Lorentz. <shrug>
Since (absurdity of the twin's paradox = principle of relativity +
time dilation), Lorentz transform must be wrong. Yes, Einstein had
nothing to do with the Lorentz transform besides plagiarism. <shrug>
----------------
As far as E=mc2 and its other aspects are concerned are discused
after 102 years in book
Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized.
, 'Einstein's E = mc2 Generalized', www.ajayonline.us
Available on Amazon.com Price $ 10.99
http://www.amazon.com/Einsteins-Mc2-Generalized-Ajay-Sharma/dp/1934360228/ref=sr_1_1/103-6624673-6380637?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190733223&sr=1-1
kem - Are you aware that the person whose handle is "Koobee Wublee" is
someone best avoided? Just read his comments above and there's your proof.
Pete
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Prev by Date: Re: How did Einstein get published?
- Next by Date: Re: How did Einstein get published?
- Previous by thread: Re: USM
- Next by thread: Re: E = mc² ... 102nd birthday of a well covered up plagiarism by the Einstein Retard
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
