Re: How did Einstein get published?

On Sep 28, 2:44 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:

[snip what was probably a repeat of the previous rant]

After giving you a second try you refuse AGAIN comment on ArXiv,
Nature, and Physics today references I introduce, and you just delete
they AGAIN...

You also refuse AGAIN to comment that Einstein SR was published
without peer-reviewing (Randy said the contrary without proof and you
complained with him).

You also prefer to ignore AGAIN that first time an Einstein's paper
was peer-reviewed he got a strong rejection because its paper was
wrong as proven by the referee.

Note for Bilge, Bill Hobba, Dono (once Karandash2), Eric Gisse, and
Tim Shuba]

Kindly add me to the list. Thanks.

No problem Dirk, done. I also reformed the manifesto to fit your
overlook of references contradicting you.

Dirk Vdm


==========================================================
Note for readers]
Because some past episodes of flamming in sci.physics.relativity, both
comments in my blog and my newsgroup e-mail are disabled.

Note for Bilge, Bill Hobba, Dono (once Karandash2), Eric Gisse, Dir
Van der moortel, and Tim Shuba]
Avoid to reply this message. The capacity of any human for correcting
your endless conceptual nonsenses and foolish mathematical mistakes
is, unfortunately, just finite. Also my occupations do not include to
teach you to read others, not to teach you dimensional analysis or
even pre-university physics.

Since you will be sanely ignored here in thereafter you are open to
misread, misquote, or misinterpret me in any way you want, specially
when that adds some light to your grey existence. You are open to
write any triviality; to invent any mistake I did not really did. You
can cite discredited, outdated, or wrong references. You can
manipulate, misread, or ignore references contradicting you. You are
also open to address any insult you consider supports your points and
you can, of course, extend your insults to any poster, institution,
colleague, friend, theories, or journal discrediting you.

You can also try to falsify ratings, voting against me dozens or
several hundred of times simulating different people. You can use the
same dishonest tactic for increasing the rating of your akins.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Where is the notificiation about IE zero day vulnerablity?
    ... then why are you wasting my time? ... References you have found in your passionate ... Why should someone do legwork to prove anything ... > in this discussion when you refuse do legwork to prove anything in this ...
    (microsoft.public.security)
  • Re: Graham Hancock and his marine archaeology in India
    ... but rare exception. ... references that Tom McDonald and his fellow professionals like. ... Tom recently made his suggestion but you refuse to follow it. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Is it secure to not refuse permissions in a non-referenced assembly?
    ... If I want to refuse all unnecessary permissions, should I add references to ... DB just by looking at its referenced assemblies. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.security)
  • Re: Stable Orbit Formulae?
    ... Thanks to your participation, and the new references, my interest in the ... able to verify that Bode's Law is not a resonance problem. ... Both Danby's Celestial Mechanics ... Are you a professional researcher in astronomy or physics? ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: HOCUS POCUS
    ... I gave you references to the papers at the time. ... If you're hoping that physics ... Marcel Luttgens ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)