Re: How did Einstein get published?
- From: "Juan R." <juanrgonzaleza@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 05:48:45 -0700
On Sep 29, 12:31 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
"Juan R." <juanrgonzal...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:1191056992.015386.16280@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sep 28, 2:44 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
[snip what was probably a repeat of the previous rant]
[snip what was probably a synopsys of a repeat of the previous rant]
Note for Bilge, Bill Hobba, Dono (once Karandash2), Eric Gisse, and
Tim Shuba]
Kindly add me to the list. Thanks.
No problem Dirk, done. I also reformed the manifesto to fit your
overlook of references contradicting you.
Dirk Vdm
Note for Bilge, Bill Hobba, Dono (once Karandash2), Eric Gisse, Dir
Van der moortel, and Tim Shuba]
Never thought that persistent crackpots would be so easily
manipulated.
Don't be so modest Dirk!
You achieved merits enough to belong to such selected class of guys.
Congrats! Now you are on a par with 'specialists' and 'physicists' who
(I only list here their recent mistakes because servers would lack
enough disk capabilities):
- Do not know four product jA has dimensions of energy (Bilge).
- Claim WdW is not a quantum gravity equation (Bill).
- Discover just a month ago (this is relativity chapter one but...)
that proper time is invariant (Eric).
- Is unable to differentiate a Newtonian potential from a relativistic
gravitational potential containing c (Dono).
- Etc.
Obviously if you were a knowleadable and nice guy you would not delete
references contradicting you but just recognize your mistake. If you
were a knowleadable and nice guy you would be not listed here, no
matter how many times you were kindly asking for receiving the honor!
Gasp, but thanks!
By replying now, after being added to the list, i think that you
failed to grasp that list means. Since you are newbie to the list i
will explain to you once.
When you are in the list, that mean you (Dirk van de moortel) posts
enough nonsense and wrong stuff in this newsgroup that any human with
finite time cannot adequately correct it in an average life.
Being listed also means that you belong to that kind of 'smart' people
almost never or just *never* recognizing a mistake when doing one. But
embracing in a flame war to discredite the other poster with insults
(e.g. your above naming "persistent crackpot" or redirecting to
alt.morons), providing no rational discourse, and zero useful
references.
The list is a public advice for newbies at this newsgroup.
It is interesting to remark I do not need to attach the manifesto to
my postings on moderated newsgroups as sci.physics.research.
Explanation is obvious, the moderators there already eliminate obvious
nonsenses and flammers.
Dirk Vdm
==========================================================
Note for readers]
Because some past episodes of flamming in sci.physics.relativity, both
comments in my blog and my newsgroup e-mail are disabled.
Note for Bilge, Bill Hobba, Dono (once Karandash2), Eric Gisse, Dir
Van der moortel, and Tim Shuba]
Avoid to reply this message. The capacity of any human for correcting
your endless conceptual nonsenses and foolish mathematical mistakes
is, unfortunately, just finite. Also my occupations do not include to
teach you to read others, not to teach you dimensional analysis or
even pre-university physics.
Since you will be sanely ignored here in thereafter you are open to
misread, misquote, or misinterpret me in any way you want, specially
when that adds some light to your grey existence. You are open to
write any triviality; to invent any mistake I did not really did. You
can cite discredited, outdated, or wrong references. You can
manipulate, misread, or ignore references contradicting you. You are
also open to address any insult you consider supports your points and
you can, of course, extend your insults to any poster, institution,
colleague, friend, theories, or journal discrediting you.
You can also try to falsify ratings, voting against me dozens or
several hundred of times simulating different people. You can use the
same dishonest tactic for increasing the rating of your akins.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How did Einstein get published?
- From: Dono
- Re: How did Einstein get published?
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: How did Einstein get published?
- References:
- How did Einstein get published?
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: How did Einstein get published?
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: How did Einstein get published?
- From: Juan R.
- Re: How did Einstein get published?
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: How did Einstein get published?
- From: Juan R.
- Re: How did Einstein get published?
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- How did Einstein get published?
- Prev by Date: Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
- Next by Date: Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
- Previous by thread: Re: How did Einstein get published?
- Next by thread: Re: How did Einstein get published?
- Index(es):