sci.physics.relativity
- "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?",
Eriw
- Re: Is Time dilation Real???,
Puppet_Sock
- IGOR is having a BIG HALLOWEEN PARTY,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- calculous in the curve space theorem 3,
caoyanwh2003
- Re: http://theorie-test.blogspot.com/,
Maja
- Re: a muon is a quantum object,
Igor
- 3rd Verdict, the CONTINU-UM,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- 2nd Verdict, the di-electric,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: am i stationary or in free fall?,
Don Stockbauer
- 1st Verdict,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Simple question,
Ali
- comet holmes again,
luke . saul
- Sagnac Experiment "OR" Higgs Field theory is ***FALSE***,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: LED light box--Only 11 mm LED slim light box in China!,
bz
- einstein and hirsch ayaan,,
Mdmeenken
- Mathematical Modelling,
Bill Hobba
- Re: relativists put gravity in a flagrant contradiction,
PD
- Can we see the twin dying?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
The theoretical problem of action at a distance,
RP
SAGNAC proves Ether and God DON'T Exist.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
ROBOT LOVERS LEADS TO INPUT OUTPUT VIRUS'S WE GO DIRECTLY TO THE GOVERNATOR,
WisKid
Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Shubee
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Don Stockbauer
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Shubee
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Shubee
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Juan R.
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Juan R.
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
d_hainz
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Juan R.
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Shubee
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Shubee
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Juan R.
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
Morphogenetic Fields and Carl Jung's Collective Unconscious,
Laurent
Magnetic Field During Motion,
Simple Simon
About Gravity, Inertia and Mass,
Laurent
"The Paradox of Zeno",
Ylmo
Hypergeometrical Formula for the Permittivity of Vaccum,
ny2292000
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not available
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: the evolution of relativity cannot be explained,
Don Stockbauer
Are we close to the next scientific revolution?,
Murphy
A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
Ylmo
Confusion in Expanding Confusion,
mluttgens
Sagnac effect from hyperbolic anisotropy of vacuum,
Just G. Waller
Einstein's Aether,
Laurent
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Mdmeenken
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Mdmeenken
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Mdmeenken
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Mdmeenken
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Laurent
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
maxwell
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Laurent
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
maxwell
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
harry
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
PD
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Laurent
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
PD
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Laurent
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
PD
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Laurent
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
PD
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Laurent
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
PD
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Laurent
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
PD
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Laurent
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Randy Poe
The Nanometre Twin,
Peri of Pera
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Simple Simon
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
The TimeLord
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Peri of Pera
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Tom Roberts
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Alen
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Alen
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Tom Roberts
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Tom Roberts
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Tom Roberts
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Tom Roberts
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Androcles
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Tom Roberts
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
bz
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
stephen
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Tom Roberts
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Alen
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
The TimeLord
Re: the outter space is expanding very fast,
The TimeLord
Re: laboratory watch shows same time for both twins,
Randy Poe
Re: relativity cannot be falsified,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
"The Creation of a Universe and the Gravity Transformations",
Ylmo
**********Unlimited Internet Free Details************,
zamsunb
Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?),
sal
Thee proper way to simulate and validate the Sagnac Effect,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hubble Spacetime observation is affected more by GR then SR,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Relativistic muon paradigm solved,
Albertito
Earth's Gravitational Time Dilation MUST affect Hubble's Expanding Universe,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Model Mechanics: A Theory of Everything,
kenseto
CUBAN CIGARS......,
Simone F. Siegal, Ob.Gyn.
Gravitational Time Dilation versus Dark Energy,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?",
Ylmo
Four mirror Sagnac,
Androcles
johnreed Take 23 - Dark Matter October 21, 2007,
johnlawrencereedjr
johnreed-Part 5 of: "Why the Mathematics Works So Well On the Universe",
johnlawrencereedjr
The simplest possible collision.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
johnreed-Research Results on Inertial Mass and Centripetal Force, Part 1 October16, 2007,
johnlawrencereedjr
johnreed-Research Results on Centripetal Force, Part 2, October 17, 2007,
johnlawrencereedjr
Re: time is nothing but motion,
BernardZ
Message not availableMessage not availableRe: time is nothing but motion,
Dono
Message not available
Re: time is nothing but motion,
Paul Cardinale
Re: Breaking the Speed LIMIT,
penguinista
Re: Why Online Games are So Fun,
Don Stockbauer
New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!!,
NovaJoe
Message not available
Re: Improved Relativity Theory and Doppler Theory of Gravity,
John Park
Biggest 'small' black hole discovered,
william . hillton
"Gravity",
Eefcm
THE RELATIVITY OF THE INERTIAL PHENOMENA (GRVITY),
NovaJoe
The at Theory.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Gravitational Time Dilation and **NOT** Dark Energy,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
BIG CRUNCH still POSSIBLE, and here's **WHEN** !,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
"The Source of Gravitational Energy",
Ylper
A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
RP
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Bill Hobba
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Bill Hobba
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Igor
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Simple Simon
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
RP
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Sue...
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Dono
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Igor
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Bill Hobba
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
bz
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
JanPB
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Androcles
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Igor
An Alternative Interpretation of the Light Postulate - Part III,
Alen
An Alternative Interpretation of the Light Postulate - Part II,
Alen
Re: Repost: SUPPRESSION OF HAMMOND BY S.P.R.,
George Hammond
An Alternative Interpretation of the Light Postulate,
Alen
THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Stamenin
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Eric Gisse
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Stamenin
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Dono
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Stamenin
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Bill Hobba
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Stamenin
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Stamenin
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
bz
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Don Stockbauer
The Impossibility of Spacelike Length Contraction,
Alen
The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Alen
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Sue...
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
valls
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Phil
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Sue...
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Phil
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
RP
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Androcles
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Phil
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
bz
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Androcles
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Phil
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Sue...
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
bz
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Sue...
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
bz
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Sue...
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Sue...
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Phil
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Igor
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Phil H
THE GENESIS OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Stamenin
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Tom Roberts
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
PD
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
PD
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
PD
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Androcles
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Daryl McCullough
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
PD
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
PD
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Tom Roberts
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Tom Roberts
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Message not availableRe: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Daryl McCullough
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Androcles
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Daryl McCullough
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Daryl McCullough
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Daryl McCullough
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Daryl McCullough
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Dono
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Eric Gisse
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Daryl McCullough
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Daryl McCullough
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Dono
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
PD
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Daryl McCullough
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Daryl McCullough
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
PD
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
PD
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
G. L. Bradford
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Yuancur
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Tom Roberts
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Yuancur
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Tom Roberts
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Yuancur
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Yuancur
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Paul Cardinale
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Don Stockbauer
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
William Hayes
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
PD
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Daryl McCullough
"Will the LIGO Experiment Work?",
Nret
What is the Absolute Nonsimultaneity Value of a Point?,
Alen
SR Without the Light Postulate?,
Alen
The Failure of Minkowski Spacetime Geometry,
Alen
Three Questions Einstein did not Consider,
Alen
Paper on Dirac sapces,
Bill Hobba
Tusseladd's Sagnac Analysis.,
Androcles
Difference between magnetism and E=mc^2 ??,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
"The Einstein Hoax",
Evird
What is the smallest unit of energy?,
Phil
Re: An Approximation of G - Extension of previous work,
Eric Gisse
How to divide by zero, from mathematics of non-life to the formula of big bang,
ExtrêmeAchillès
"The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems",
Tahw
The Road to Physics Knowledge,
nbmaia@xxxxxxxxx
The Twins are seen aging Differently on the SAME Platform???,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
The Relativity of Motion in Space,
NovaJoe
Acceleration should cause Time Dilation,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?,
Androcles
Re: unbulivable inconsistency in high ranked sciencists,
NovaJoe
Re: consequently human invented relativity is wrong,
NovaJoe
Re: self-established relativists dont know their tensors whatsoever,
Igor
DONO don't know that light's speed in glass is group velocity,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Proof that Dono LIE about "moving" glass affects light's speed,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
"The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets",
Morf
Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Igor
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
RP
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
RP
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Igor
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Igor
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Dono
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Dono
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
PD
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
PD
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
PD
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
PD
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
RP
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Pmb
light sensitive panels...,
neutrino
Sagnac, Coriolis, Shapiro.,
Androcles
Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Saint Isadore Patron Saint of the Internet
Effect of Magnetism on the SpaceTime Field.,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Eric Gisse
Re: Mechanical model of Sagnac,
guskz
A New Notion Of Damped Harmonic Motion,
Symmetry Observer
Anyone know the following Time Dilation math?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
xxein
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment and Lorentz polarization.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Tom Roberts
- Hahahahaha!,
Androcles
- Re: Hahahahaha!,
harry
- Re: Hahahahaha!,
Androcles
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
bz
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
bz
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Eric Gisse
"The Nature of Mass",
Wole
Re: Is it at all possible -- at least in theory -- to violate the second law?,
shalayka
DONO don't know light's speed in glass is group velocity.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
DONO don't know light speed in glass is group velocity.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Do Virtual Photons Exist?",
Ploc
Relativistic twins simulation,
Paul B. Andersen
Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?,
John Jones
Kerr-Newman-deSitter,
mathengman
Difference between physics and mathematics,
Juan R.
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
Tom Van Flandern
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
Igor
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
harry
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
harry
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
Tom Van Flandern
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
Igor
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
Juan R.
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
Igor
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
Androcles
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
Juan R.
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
harry
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
Juan R.
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
RP
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
harry
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
Juan R.
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Difference between physics and mathematics,
RP
magnetic monopole, homework help,
Dean D
"Evidence of the Existence of the Aether",
Doof
Einstein's 1906 paper,
valls
MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Message not available
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
Androcles
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
Androcles
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
Androcles
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
Androcles
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
PD
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
Androcles
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
PD
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
Androcles
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
PD
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
Eric Gisse
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
PD
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Message not available
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
PD
- Message not available
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
PD
- Message not available
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
PD
- Message not available
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
PD
- Message not available
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
PD
- Message not available
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
PD
- Message not available
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
Paul B. Andersen
- Message not available
- Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not available
Message not available
Re: twin relativity,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Lorentz Ether Theory,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory,
harry
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory,
harry
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory,
harry
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory,
harry
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory,
harry
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory,
harry
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory,
harry
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory,
Androcles
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory,
Dono
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory,
Androcles
Lorentz' Ether Theory NEVER been disproven.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Corrections to Special Relativity",
LLec
Energy Momentum tensor.,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: study : real anti-gravity only by inverse geometry,
Igor
The Origin of the Universe. A criticism.,
John Jones
"Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?",
Etad
Mr. Messager - Stop Your Slander,
Etad
The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories,
John Jones
- Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories,
Eric Gisse
- Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories,
Bill Hobba
- Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories,
PD
- Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories,
Charlie33
- Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories,
John Jones
- Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories,
PD
- Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories,
John Jones
- Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories,
PD
- Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories,
Bill Hobba
- Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories,
John Jones
- Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories,
PD
- Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories,
John Jones
- Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories,
PD
- Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories,
John Jones
- Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories,
PD
- Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories,
John Jones
- Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories,
PD
Re: time is the discrete pat of nature, not energy,
Don Stockbauer
Re: how many infinities are there in a black hole,
Eric Gisse
Re: did einstein stole his tensors?,
Pmb
Message not available
Re: did einstein stole his tensors?,
Ken S. Tucker
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: did einstein stole his tensors?,
JanPB
Re: did einstein stole his tensors?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: did einstein stole his tensors?,
Dave Cook
Re: did einstein stole his tensors?,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: did einstein stole his tensors?,
harry
"Retic Postings and SPAM",
Etad
Randy's friend JCON too dumb to know F= qE(1 + v^2/c^2),
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: unidentified flying objects defy relativity,
Don Stockbauer
Proof that JCON is a Trolling Heckler,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Proof: Radiation because the Synchrotron is a non-harmonious Atom,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Proof: Radiation because the Synchrotron is non-harmonious Atom,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Christof Koch,
Jong Kim
JCON's physics degree says qE(1 + v^2/c^2) is made up equation!,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
JCON's common mistake with Magnetic Deviation Observation,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
JCON is making the common mistake with Magnetic Observation,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Question for Koobee about Areas,
Daryl McCullough
Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - A Java Applet,
Jerry
Message not available
Message not available
Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet,
Androcles
Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet,
Jerry
Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet,
Androcles
Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet,
Jerry
Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet,
Androcles
Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 4 of my Java Applet,
Jerry
Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Transients,
Jerry
Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Transients,
Androcles
Henri Wilson's Strange Version of Wave Mechanics,
Jerry
Re: Einstein's Strange Version of Wave Mechanics,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Einstein's Strange Version of Wave Mechanics,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Einstein's Strange Version of Wave Mechanics,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Einstein's Strange Version of Wave Mechanics,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: Henri Wilson's Strange Version of Wave Mechanics,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Henri Wilson's Strange Version of Wave Mechanics,
Androcles
Domestic Science,
John Jones
The nail in the coffin for Newtonian and Einsteinian Space,
John Jones
Re: Climate Change Forum,
Robert Karl Stonjek
Re: AN EINSTEIN DISPROOF FOR DUMMIES (is Copyrighted),
Pmb
Tuv=0 relates to [Fuvw] =0 ?,
Ken S. Tucker
Weak question,
Simple Simon
Re: You guys are WAY behind the times,
harry
Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
harry
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
harry
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
harry
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
harry
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
Igor
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
Igor
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
Igor
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
Igor
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
Igor
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
Igor
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
Igor
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
jcon
- Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Article: Physicist defends Einstein's theory and 'speed of gravity' measurement,
Androcles
Hysteris Loss and Potential difference cause Synchrotron Radiation,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
Igor
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
Androcles
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
Igor
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
Androcles
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
Igor
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
Igor
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
Androcles
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
John Kennaugh
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
PD
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
Igor
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
Igor
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
Igor
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
Androcles
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
John Kennaugh
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
John Kennaugh
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
John Kennaugh
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.,
Igor
Re: WHO DEFENDS EINSTEIN IDIOCIES?,
Simple Simon
Cosmological and local geometry are not related,
John Jones
Diffusion by Random Walk,
shalayka
"Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Weiv
Sorry to say: Synchrotron radiation is due to Hysteresis Loss.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Double-slit experiment SHOWS the electron is a PARTICLE,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Getting rid of Space,
John Jones
Re: Getting rid of Space,
PD
Re: Getting rid of Space,
Igor
Re: Getting rid of Space,
Bill Hobba
Relating "c" to the mass of an electron?,
Ken S. Tucker
Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
jcon
- Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
Androcles
- Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
jcon
- Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
Androcles
- Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
OG
- Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
jcon
- Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
Androcles
- Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
OG
- Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
Randy Poe
- Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
Androcles
- Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
Randy Poe
- Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
Randy Poe
- Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
Randy Poe
- Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
Androcles
- Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
Randy Poe
- Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
Androcles
- Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
Randy Poe
- Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: A puzzle,
kenseto
"The Error in Relativistic Physics",
Weiv
Re: Spanning Two Eras of Relativity,
Jong Kim
Re: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ,
Androcles
Re: Debunking Nimtz,
Vern
Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself,
Jeckyl
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself,
Wings of Truth
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself,
Dono
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself,
Androcles
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself,
OG
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself,
Androcles
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself,
Wings of Truth
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself,
Wings of Truth
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself,
Wings of Truth
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself,
Wings of Truth
- Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself,
Tom Roberts
Re: What is science?,
Jeckyl
Renormalizable Quantum Gravity?,
Jack Sarfatti
Re: A Synchrotron Magnetic Force is different from a Wire.,
jcon
Einstein's General Relativity as a Spin 1 Yang-Mills Theory,
Jack Sarfatti
Re: the self-establishment still dont know their tensors,
Eric Gisse
Re: what is a theory of everything?,
bz
"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website",
Nalp
Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com ),
sal
v = cz ?,
mluttgens
- Re: v = cz ?,
harry
- Re: v = cz ?,
shalayka
- Re: v = cz ?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: v = cz ?,
mluttgens
- Re: v = cz ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: v = cz ?,
Dono
- Re: v = cz ?,
mluttgens
- Re: v = cz ?,
Dono
- Re: v = cz ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: v = cz ?,
mluttgens
- Re: v = cz ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: v = cz ?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: v = cz ?,
mluttgens
- Re: v = cz ?,
Dono
- Re: v = cz ?,
mluttgens
- Re: v = cz ?,
Dono
- Re: v = cz ?,
mluttgens
- Re: v = cz ?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: v = cz ?,
mluttgens
- Re: v = cz ?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: v = cz ?,
mluttgens
Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent,
kenseto
Re: Three Time Puzzles,
Bill Hobba
Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?,
Bill Hobba
Re: How did Einstein get published?,
Tom Roberts
Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation,
Randy Poe
Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.,
Androcles
Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.,
Don Stockbauer
Re: Examining g0i,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Examining g0i,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i,
Pmb
- Re: Examining g0i,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Examining g0i,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Examining g0i,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Examining g0i,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Examining g0i,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Examining g0i,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Examining g0i,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: Examining g0i,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Examining g0i,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Examining g0i,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Examining g0i,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Examining g0i,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Examining g0i,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i,
Dono
- Re: Examining g0i,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i,
Dono
- Re: Examining g0i,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i,
Pmb
- Re: Examining g0i,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Examining g0i,
Dono
- Re: Examining g0i,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
Don Stockbauer
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
JanPB
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
Pmb
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
Eric Gisse
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
JanPB
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
JanPB
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
Androcles
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
Simple Simon
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
Pmb
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
JanPB
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
Daryl McCullough
- Message not available
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
Pmb
- Message not available
- Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
Pmb
Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
bz
Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors,
PD
