sci.physics.relativity
- "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?",
Eriw
- Re: Is Time dilation Real???,
Puppet_Sock
- IGOR is having a BIG HALLOWEEN PARTY,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- calculous in the curve space theorem 3,
caoyanwh2003
- Re: http://theorie-test.blogspot.com/,
Maja
- Re: a muon is a quantum object,
Igor
- 3rd Verdict, the CONTINU-UM,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- 2nd Verdict, the di-electric,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: am i stationary or in free fall?,
Don Stockbauer
- 1st Verdict,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Simple question,
Ali
- comet holmes again,
luke . saul
- Sagnac Experiment "OR" Higgs Field theory is ***FALSE***,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: LED light box--Only 11 mm LED slim light box in China!,
bz
- einstein and hirsch ayaan,,
Mdmeenken
- Mathematical Modelling,
Bill Hobba
- Re: relativists put gravity in a flagrant contradiction,
PD
- Can we see the twin dying?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
The theoretical problem of action at a distance,
RP
SAGNAC proves Ether and God DON'T Exist.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
ROBOT LOVERS LEADS TO INPUT OUTPUT VIRUS'S WE GO DIRECTLY TO THE GOVERNATOR,
WisKid
Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Shubee
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Don Stockbauer
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Shubee
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Shubee
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Juan R.
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Juan R.
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
d_hainz
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Juan R.
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Shubee
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Shubee
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Juan R.
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
Morphogenetic Fields and Carl Jung's Collective Unconscious,
Laurent
Magnetic Field During Motion,
Simple Simon
About Gravity, Inertia and Mass,
Laurent
"The Paradox of Zeno",
Ylmo
Hypergeometrical Formula for the Permittivity of Vaccum,
ny2292000
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not available
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: the evolution of relativity cannot be explained,
Don Stockbauer
Are we close to the next scientific revolution?,
Murphy
A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
Ylmo
Confusion in Expanding Confusion,
mluttgens
Sagnac effect from hyperbolic anisotropy of vacuum,
Just G. Waller
Einstein's Aether,
Laurent
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Mdmeenken
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Mdmeenken
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Mdmeenken
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Mdmeenken
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Laurent
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
maxwell
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Laurent
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
maxwell
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
harry
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
PD
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Laurent
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
PD
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Laurent
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
PD
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Laurent
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
PD
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Laurent
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
PD
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Laurent
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
PD
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Laurent
- Re: Einstein's Aether,
Randy Poe
The Nanometre Twin,
Peri of Pera
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Simple Simon
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
The TimeLord
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Peri of Pera
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Tom Roberts
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Alen
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Alen
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Tom Roberts
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Tom Roberts
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Tom Roberts
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Tom Roberts
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Androcles
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Tom Roberts
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
bz
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
stephen
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Tom Roberts
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Alen
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
The TimeLord
Re: the outter space is expanding very fast,
The TimeLord
Re: laboratory watch shows same time for both twins,
Randy Poe
Re: relativity cannot be falsified,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
"The Creation of a Universe and the Gravity Transformations",
Ylmo
**********Unlimited Internet Free Details************,
zamsunb
Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?),
sal
Thee proper way to simulate and validate the Sagnac Effect,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hubble Spacetime observation is affected more by GR then SR,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Relativistic muon paradigm solved,
Albertito
Earth's Gravitational Time Dilation MUST affect Hubble's Expanding Universe,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Model Mechanics: A Theory of Everything,
kenseto
CUBAN CIGARS......,
Simone F. Siegal, Ob.Gyn.
Gravitational Time Dilation versus Dark Energy,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?",
Ylmo
Four mirror Sagnac,
Androcles
johnreed Take 23 - Dark Matter October 21, 2007,
johnlawrencereedjr
johnreed-Part 5 of: "Why the Mathematics Works So Well On the Universe",
johnlawrencereedjr
The simplest possible collision.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
johnreed-Research Results on Inertial Mass and Centripetal Force, Part 1 October16, 2007,
johnlawrencereedjr
johnreed-Research Results on Centripetal Force, Part 2, October 17, 2007,
johnlawrencereedjr
Re: time is nothing but motion,
BernardZ
Message not availableMessage not availableRe: time is nothing but motion,
Dono
Message not available
Re: time is nothing but motion,
Paul Cardinale
Re: Breaking the Speed LIMIT,
penguinista
Re: Why Online Games are So Fun,
Don Stockbauer
New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!!,
NovaJoe
Message not available
Re: Improved Relativity Theory and Doppler Theory of Gravity,
John Park
Biggest 'small' black hole discovered,
william . hillton
"Gravity",
Eefcm
THE RELATIVITY OF THE INERTIAL PHENOMENA (GRVITY),
NovaJoe
The at Theory.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Gravitational Time Dilation and **NOT** Dark Energy,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
BIG CRUNCH still POSSIBLE, and here's **WHEN** !,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
"The Source of Gravitational Energy",
Ylper
A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
RP
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Bill Hobba
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Bill Hobba
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Igor
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Simple Simon
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
RP
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Sue...
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Dono
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Igor
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Bill Hobba
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
bz
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
JanPB
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Androcles
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Igor
An Alternative Interpretation of the Light Postulate - Part III,
Alen
An Alternative Interpretation of the Light Postulate - Part II,
Alen
Re: Repost: SUPPRESSION OF HAMMOND BY S.P.R.,
George Hammond
An Alternative Interpretation of the Light Postulate,
Alen
THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Stamenin
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Eric Gisse
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Stamenin
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Dono
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Stamenin
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Bill Hobba
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Stamenin
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Stamenin
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
bz
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Don Stockbauer
The Impossibility of Spacelike Length Contraction,
Alen
The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Alen
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Sue...
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
valls
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Phil
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Sue...
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Phil
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
RP
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Androcles
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Phil
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
bz
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Androcles
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Phil
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Sue...
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
bz
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Sue...
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
bz
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Sue...
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Sue...
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Phil
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Igor
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Phil H
THE GENESIS OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Stamenin
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Tom Roberts
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
PD
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
PD
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
PD
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Androcles
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Daryl McCullough
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
PD
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
PD
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Tom Roberts
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Tom Roberts
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Message not availableRe: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Daryl McCullough
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Androcles
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Daryl McCullough
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Daryl McCullough
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Daryl McCullough
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Daryl McCullough
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Dono
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Eric Gisse
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Daryl McCullough
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Daryl McCullough
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Dono
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
PD
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Daryl McCullough
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Daryl McCullough
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
PD
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
PD
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Koobee Wublee
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
G. L. Bradford
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Yuancur
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Tom Roberts
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Yuancur
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Tom Roberts
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Yuancur
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Yuancur
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Paul Cardinale
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Don Stockbauer
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
William Hayes
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
PD
Re: relativity hates empirical observations,
Daryl McCullough
"Will the LIGO Experiment Work?",
Nret
What is the Absolute Nonsimultaneity Value of a Point?,
Alen
SR Without the Light Postulate?,
Alen
The Failure of Minkowski Spacetime Geometry,
Alen
Three Questions Einstein did not Consider,
Alen
Paper on Dirac sapces,
Bill Hobba
Tusseladd's Sagnac Analysis.,
Androcles
Difference between magnetism and E=mc^2 ??,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
"The Einstein Hoax",
Evird
What is the smallest unit of energy?,
Phil
Re: An Approximation of G - Extension of previous work,
Eric Gisse
How to divide by zero, from mathematics of non-life to the formula of big bang,
ExtrêmeAchillès
"The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems",
Tahw
The Road to Physics Knowledge,
nbmaia@xxxxxxxxx
The Twins are seen aging Differently on the SAME Platform???,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
The Relativity of Motion in Space,
NovaJoe
Acceleration should cause Time Dilation,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?,
Androcles
Re: unbulivable inconsistency in high ranked sciencists,
NovaJoe
Re: consequently human invented relativity is wrong,
NovaJoe
Re: self-established relativists dont know their tensors whatsoever,
Igor
DONO don't know that light's speed in glass is group velocity,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Proof that Dono LIE about "moving" glass affects light's speed,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
"The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets",
Morf
Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Igor
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
RP
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
RP
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Igor
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Igor
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Dono
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Dono
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
PD
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
PD
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
PD
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
PD
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
RP
- Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
Pmb
light sensitive panels...,
neutrino
Sagnac, Coriolis, Shapiro.,
Androcles
Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.,
Saint Isadore Patron Saint of the Internet
Effect of Magnetism on the SpaceTime Field.,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.,
Eric Gisse
Re: Mechanical model of Sagnac,
guskz
A New Notion Of Damped Harmonic Motion,
Symmetry Observer
Anyone know the following Time Dilation math?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
xxein
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment and Lorentz polarization.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Tom Roberts
- Hahahahaha!,
Androcles
- Re: Hahahahaha!,
harry
- Re: Hahahahaha!,
Androcles
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
bz
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
bz
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Eric Gisse
"The Nature of Mass",
Wole
Re: Is it at all possible -- at least in theory -- to violate the second law?,
shalayka
DONO don't know light's speed in glass is group velocity.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
DONO don't know light speed in glass is group velocity.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Do Virtual Photons Exist?",
Ploc
Relativistic twins simulation,
Paul B. Andersen