sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: bz
• "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Eriw
• Re: calculous in the curve space theorem 3
  • From: sal
• Re: Is Time dilation Real???
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• calculous in the curve space theorem 3
  • From: caoyanwh2003
• Re: 1st Verdict
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: calculous in the curve space theorem 3
  • From: sal
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: d_hainz
• Re: a muon is a quantum object
  • From: Igor
• Re: Simple question
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Ali
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: bz
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Simple question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: bz
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Alen
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: stephen
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Alen
• Re: The theoretical problem of action at a distance
  • From: bz
• Re: 1st Verdict
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: 1st Verdict
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: shuba
• Re: 1st Verdict
  • From: PD
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: harry
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Can we see the twin dying?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: IGOR is having a BIG HALLOWEEN PARTY
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• IGOR is having a BIG HALLOWEEN PARTY
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: 1st Verdict
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• calculous in the curve space theorem 3
  • From: caoyanwh2003
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The theoretical problem of action at a distance
  • From: RP
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: 1st Verdict
  • From: PD
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: http://theorie-test.blogspot.com/
  • From: Maja
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Alen
• Re: Four mirror Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: RP
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: JanPB
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: a muon is a quantum object
  • From: Igor
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Simple question
  • From: PD
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The theoretical problem of action at a distance
  • From: bz
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Simple question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Simple question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: shuba
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Alen
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Alen
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Confusion in Expanding Confusion
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Four mirror Sagnac
  • From: harry
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: harry
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Phil
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can we see the twin dying?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• 3rd Verdict, the CONTINU-UM
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• 2nd Verdict, the di-electric
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Alen
• Re: am i stationary or in free fall?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Can we see the twin dying?
  • From: RP
• 1st Verdict
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Simple question
  • From: PD
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Phil H
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Phil
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Four mirror Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Phil
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: bz
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Simple question
  • From: Ali
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: shuba
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• comet holmes again
  • From: luke . saul
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: harry
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Sagnac Experiment "OR" Higgs Field theory is ***FALSE***
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Sagnac Experiment "OR" Higgs Field theory is ***FALSE***
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: LED light box--Only 11 mm LED slim light box in China!
  • From: bz
• einstein and hirsch ayaan,
  • From: Mdmeenken
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Alen
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: shuba
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Four mirror Sagnac
  • From: harry
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: harry
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: harry
• Re: Can we see the twin dying?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: the outter space is expanding very fast
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: laboratory watch shows same time for both twins
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Alen
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Alen
• Re: Can we see the twin dying?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: The theoretical problem of action at a distance
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Mathematical Modelling
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Can we see the twin dying?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The theoretical problem of action at a distance
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: laboratory watch shows same time for both twins
  • From: PD
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Ylno
• Re: relativists put gravity in a flagrant contradiction
  • From: RP
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Can we see the twin dying?
  • From: RP
• Re: relativists put gravity in a flagrant contradiction
  • From: PD
• Re: The theoretical problem of action at a distance
  • From: RP
• Can we see the twin dying?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: PD
• Re: laboratory watch shows same time for both twins
  • From: PD
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The theoretical problem of action at a distance
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• The theoretical problem of action at a distance
  • From: RP
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Confusion in Expanding Confusion
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Mdmeenken
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Confusion in Expanding Confusion
  • From: tamarastro
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: laboratory watch shows same time for both twins
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• SAGNAC proves Ether and God DON'T Exist.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Magnetic Field During Motion
  • From: mL
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Mdmeenken
• ROBOT LOVERS LEADS TO INPUT OUTPUT VIRUS'S WE GO DIRECTLY TO THE GOVERNATOR
  • From: WisKid
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: PD
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Alen
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Alen
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Magnetic Field During Motion
  • From: mL
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!!
  • From: NovaJoe
• Morphogenetic Fields and Carl Jung's Collective Unconscious
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Magnetic Field During Motion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Magnetic Field During Motion
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: shuba
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Magnetic Field During Motion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: BernardZ
• Magnetic Field During Motion
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Sagnac effect from hyperbolic anisotropy of vacuum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac effect from hyperbolic anisotropy of vacuum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac effect from hyperbolic anisotropy of vacuum
  • From: Just G. Waller
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: PD
• Re: New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!!
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: PD
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Alen
• About Gravity, Inertia and Mass
  • From: Laurent
• "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Ylmo
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Hypergeometrical Formula for the Permittivity of Vaccum
  • From: Androcles
• Hypergeometrical Formula for the Permittivity of Vaccum
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Mdmeenken
• Re: New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!!
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!!
  • From: NovaJoe
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Alen
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: PD
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: the evolution of relativity cannot be explained
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: PD
• Re: Sagnac effect from hyperbolic anisotropy of vacuum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac effect from hyperbolic anisotropy of vacuum
  • From: Just G. Waller
• Re: Relativistic muon paradigm solved
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Are we close to the next scientific revolution?
  • From: Murphy
• Re: Sagnac effect from hyperbolic anisotropy of vacuum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• Re: the outter space is expanding very fast
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: bz
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Ylmo
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: sal
• Confusion in Expanding Confusion
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Four mirror Sagnac
  • From: harry
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: PD
• Re: laboratory watch shows same time for both twins
  • From: PD
• Re: laboratory watch shows same time for both twins
  • From: Alen
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: bz
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Mdmeenken
• Re: the outter space is expanding very fast
  • From: Mdmeenken
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Sagnac effect from hyperbolic anisotropy of vacuum
  • From: Just G. Waller
• Re: Four mirror Sagnac
  • From: harry
• Re: Four mirror Sagnac
  • From: harry
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: harry
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: harry
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Dono
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: laboratory watch shows same time for both twins
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Phil
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Thee proper way to simulate and validate the Sagnac Effect
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Relativistic muon paradigm solved
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Relativistic muon paradigm solved
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: laboratory watch shows same time for both twins
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Thee proper way to simulate and validate the Sagnac Effect
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Thee proper way to simulate and validate the Sagnac Effect
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: laboratory watch shows same time for both twins
  • From: Dono
• Re: Thee proper way to simulate and validate the Sagnac Effect
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: laboratory watch shows same time for both twins
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: the outter space is expanding very fast
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Relativistic muon paradigm solved
  • From: xxein
• Re: laboratory watch shows same time for both twins
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity cannot be falsified
  • From: PD
• Re: laboratory watch shows same time for both twins
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: bz
• Re: relativity cannot be falsified
  • From: Pmb
• Re: relativity cannot be falsified
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity cannot be falsified
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity cannot be falsified
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity cannot be falsified
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity cannot be falsified
  • From: Androcles
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: relativity cannot be falsified
  • From: PD
• Re: relativity cannot be falsified
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity cannot be falsified
  • From: PD
• Re: relativity cannot be falsified
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity cannot be falsified
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: PD
• "The Creation of a Universe and the Gravity Transformations"
  • From: Ylmo
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: PD
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: sal
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: bz
• Re: Paper on Dirac sapces
  • From: DiamondSkeptic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: harry
• **********Unlimited Internet Free Details************
  • From: zamsunb
• Re: The simplest possible collision.
  • From: harry
• Re: Four mirror Sagnac
  • From: harry
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Spinning Ball Paradox (contradiction?)
  • From: sal
• Re: The simplest possible collision.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: What is the smallest unit of energy?
  • From: Phil
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Strange Version of Wave Mechanics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: light sensitive panels...
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!!
  • From: PD
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Ylmo
• Re: New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!!
  • From: bz
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: PD
• Re: Thee proper way to simulate and validate the Sagnac Effect
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Four mirror Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: light sensitive panels...
  • From: RP
• Re: Four mirror Sagnac
  • From: harry
• Re: light sensitive panels...
  • From: RP
• Thee proper way to simulate and validate the Sagnac Effect
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Earth's Gravitational Time Dilation MUST affect Hubble's Expanding Universe
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!!
  • From: NovaJoe
• Re: New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!!
  • From: NovaJoe
• Re: light sensitive panels...
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: light sensitive panels...
  • From: RP
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: light sensitive panels...
  • From: RP
• Re: New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!!
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!!
  • From: NovaJoe
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Four mirror Sagnac
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativistic muon paradigm solved
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Strange Version of Wave Mechanics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Four mirror Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Hubble Spacetime observation is affected more by GR then SR
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativistic muon paradigm solved
  • From: PD
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Earth's Gravitational Time Dilation MUST affect Hubble's Expanding Universe
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Earth's Gravitational Time Dilation MUST affect Hubble's Expanding Universe
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Earth's Gravitational Time Dilation MUST affect Hubble's Expanding Universe
  • From: Igor
• Re: Relativistic muon paradigm solved
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativistic muon paradigm solved
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Relativistic muon paradigm solved
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativistic muon paradigm solved
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Earth's Gravitational Time Dilation MUST affect Hubble's Expanding Universe
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativistic muon paradigm solved
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Alen
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Androcles
• "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Ylmo
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativistic muon paradigm solved
  • From: Androcles
• Relativistic muon paradigm solved
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The simplest possible collision.
  • From: harry
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Earth's Gravitational Time Dilation MUST affect Hubble's Expanding Universe
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Phil
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Gravitational Time Dilation versus Dark Energy
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: Henri Wilson's Strange Version of Wave Mechanics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Strange Version of Wave Mechanics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: The simplest possible collision.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Model Mechanics: A Theory of Everything
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Model Mechanics: A Theory of Everything
  • From: PD
• Re: time is nothing but motion
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Model Mechanics: A Theory of Everything
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: time is nothing but motion
  • From: Igor
• Model Mechanics: A Theory of Everything
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The simplest possible collision.
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: The simplest possible collision.
  • From: PD
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• CUBAN CIGARS......
  • From: Simone F. Siegal, Ob.Gyn.
• Re: The simplest possible collision.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Four mirror Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Four mirror Sagnac
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Gravitational Time Dilation versus Dark Energy
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: time is nothing but motion
  • From: Dono
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Ylmo
• Re: Four mirror Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: PD
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: PD
• Re: Four mirror Sagnac
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Henri Wilson's Strange Version of Wave Mechanics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Strange Version of Wave Mechanics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: DONO don't know that light's speed in glass is group velocity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: time is nothing but motion
  • From: harry
• Re: time is nothing but motion
  • From: harry
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The simplest possible collision.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Henri Wilson's Strange Version of Wave Mechanics
  • From: Jerry
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Androcles
• Four mirror Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• johnreed Take 23 - Dark Matter October 21, 2007
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• johnreed-Part 5 of: "Why the Mathematics Works So Well On the Universe"
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: time is nothing but motion
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: time is nothing but motion
  • From: RP
• Re: The simplest possible collision.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The simplest possible collision.
  • From: adam . trepczynski
• Re: The simplest possible collision.
  • From: adam . trepczynski
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Bill Hobba
• The simplest possible collision.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• johnreed-Research Results on Inertial Mass and Centripetal Force, Part 1 October16, 2007
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: The at Theory.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: time is nothing but motion
  • From: PD
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: time is nothing but motion
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Dono
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Alen
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Alen
• johnreed-Research Results on Centripetal Force, Part 2, October 17, 2007
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory and Doppler Theory of Gravity
  • From: John Park
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Pmb
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Transients
  • From: Androcles
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: time is nothing but motion
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: time is nothing but motion
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Breaking the Speed LIMIT
  • From: penguinista
• Re: Why Online Games are So Fun
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Gravitational Time Dilation and **NOT** Dark Energy
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Transients
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory and Doppler Theory of Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!!
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: PD
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: PD
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Igor
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Igor
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Igor
• Re: Gravitational Time Dilation and **NOT** Dark Energy
  • From: Igor
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE INERTIAL PHENOMENA (GRVITY)
  • From: Igor
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: Biggest 'small' black hole discovered
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: BIG CRUNCH still POSSIBLE, and here's **WHEN** !
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!!
  • From: NovaJoe
• New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!!
  • From: NovaJoe
• Re: SR Without the Light Postulate?
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory and Doppler Theory of Gravity
  • From: John Park
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Biggest 'small' black hole discovered
  • From: william . hillton
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Alen
• "Gravity"
  • From: Eefcm
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: The at Theory.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE INERTIAL PHENOMENA (GRVITY)
  • From: NovaJoe
• THE RELATIVITY OF THE INERTIAL PHENOMENA (GRVITY)
  • From: NovaJoe
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• The at Theory.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Alen
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: RP
• Re: An Alternative Interpretation of the Light Postulate - Part II
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Impossibility of Spacelike Length Contraction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Impossibility of Spacelike Length Contraction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Phil
• Gravitational Time Dilation and **NOT** Dark Energy
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Proof that Dono LIE about "moving" glass affects light's speed
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• BIG CRUNCH still POSSIBLE, and here's **WHEN** !
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Proof that Dono LIE about "moving" glass affects light's speed
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Proof that Dono LIE about "moving" glass affects light's speed
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: light sensitive panels...
  • From: sal
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Ylper
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: PD
• Re: An Alternative Interpretation of the Light Postulate - Part III
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: An Alternative Interpretation of the Light Postulate - Part II
  • From: RP
• Re: An Alternative Interpretation of the Light Postulate - Part II
  • From: RP
• Re: An Alternative Interpretation of the Light Postulate - Part II
  • From: Alen
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: RP
• A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Alen
• An Alternative Interpretation of the Light Postulate - Part III
  • From: Alen
• Re: An Alternative Interpretation of the Light Postulate - Part II
  • From: RP
• Re: An Alternative Interpretation of the Light Postulate - Part II
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Impossibility of Spacelike Length Contraction
  • From: RP
• Re: The Impossibility of Spacelike Length Contraction
  • From: RP
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• An Alternative Interpretation of the Light Postulate - Part II
  • From: Alen
• Re: An Alternative Interpretation of the Light Postulate
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Impossibility of Spacelike Length Contraction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Phil
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: PD
• Re: The Impossibility of Spacelike Length Contraction
  • From: RP
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Impossibility of Spacelike Length Contraction
  • From: RP
• Re: Repost: SUPPRESSION OF HAMMOND BY S.P.R.
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: The Impossibility of Spacelike Length Contraction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The Impossibility of Spacelike Length Contraction
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The Impossibility of Spacelike Length Contraction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: THE GENESIS OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Impossibility of Spacelike Length Contraction
  • From: RP
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: THE GENESIS OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• Re: What is the Absolute Nonsimultaneity Value of a Point?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The Impossibility of Spacelike Length Contraction
  • From: Igor
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Igor
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Impossibility of Spacelike Length Contraction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Proof that Dono LIE about "moving" glass affects light's speed
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: PD
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: PD
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: valls
• An Alternative Interpretation of the Light Postulate
  • From: Alen
• Re: The Impossibility of Spacelike Length Contraction
  • From: harry
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Impossibility of Spacelike Length Contraction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hahahahaha!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Impossibility of Spacelike Length Contraction
  • From: harry
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Eric Gisse
• THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: SR Without the Light Postulate?
  • From: harry
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: What is the smallest unit of energy?
  • From: PD
• Re: Hahahahaha!
  • From: harry
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Impossibility of Spacelike Length Contraction
  • From: Sue...
• The Impossibility of Spacelike Length Contraction
  • From: Alen
• Re: THE GENESIS OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: William Hayes
• The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Alen
• Re: The Failure of Minkowski Spacetime Geometry
  • From: Alen
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: PD
• Re: THE GENESIS OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: THE GENESIS OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Bill Hobba
• THE GENESIS OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Paper on Dirac sapces
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Androcles
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Failure of Minkowski Spacetime Geometry
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity hates empirical observations
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The trolls of Norway
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Failure of Minkowski Spacetime Geometry
  • From: xray4abc
• Hahahahaha!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Failure of Minkowski Spacetime Geometry
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SR Without the Light Postulate?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: What is the smallest unit of energy?
  • From: Louis_N
• Re: Difference between magnetism and E=mc^2 ??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Failure of Minkowski Spacetime Geometry
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: An Approximation of G - Extension of previous work
  • From: shalayka
• Re: SR Without the Light Postulate?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Difference between magnetism and E=mc^2 ??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Difference between magnetism and E=mc^2 ??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Failure of Minkowski Spacetime Geometry
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR Without the Light Postulate?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Three Questions Einstein did not Consider
  • From: PD
• Re: SR Without the Light Postulate?
  • From: PD
• Re: Difference between magnetism and E=mc^2 ??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: An Approximation of G - Extension of previous work
  • From: shalayka
• "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Nret
• Re: What is the Absolute Nonsimultaneity Value of a Point?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: SR Without the Light Postulate?
  • From: Pmb
• What is the Absolute Nonsimultaneity Value of a Point?
  • From: Alen
• Re: What is the smallest unit of energy?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: SR Without the Light Postulate?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• SR Without the Light Postulate?
  • From: Alen
• Re: The Failure of Minkowski Spacetime Geometry
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Failure of Minkowski Spacetime Geometry
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: What is the smallest unit of energy?
  • From: Phil
• Re: What is the smallest unit of energy?
  • From: Phil
• Re: Three Questions Einstein did not Consider
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Three Questions Einstein did not Consider
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Three Questions Einstein did not Consider
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Three Questions Einstein did not Consider
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Failure of Minkowski Spacetime Geometry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Paper on Dirac sapces
  • From: DiamondSkeptic
• Re: The Failure of Minkowski Spacetime Geometry
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• The Failure of Minkowski Spacetime Geometry
  • From: Alen
• Re: Three Questions Einstein did not Consider
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Three Questions Einstein did not Consider
  • From: shuba
• Re: Three Questions Einstein did not Consider
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Three Questions Einstein did not Consider
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Three Questions Einstein did not Consider
  • From: Alen
• Re: Anyone know the following Time Dilation math?
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: Climate Change Forum
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Paper on Dirac sapces
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The trolls of Norway
  • From: Androcles
• Tusseladd's Sagnac Analysis.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Relativity of Motion in Space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: PD
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: light sensitive panels...
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is the smallest unit of energy?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Difference between magnetism and E=mc^2 ??
  • From: OG
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Difference between magnetism and E=mc^2 ??
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Difference between magnetism and E=mc^2 ??
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Difference between magnetism and E=mc^2 ??
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Climate Change Forum
  • From: sal
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What is the smallest unit of energy?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What is the smallest unit of energy?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: PD
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: PD
• Re: Difference between magnetism and E=mc^2 ??
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Difference between magnetism and E=mc^2 ??
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Twins are seen aging Differently on the SAME Platform???
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Difference between magnetism and E=mc^2 ??
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Twins are seen aging Differently on the SAME Platform???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is the smallest unit of energy?
  • From: PD
• Difference between magnetism and E=mc^2 ??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Relativity of Motion in Space
  • From: NovaJoe
• Re: What is the smallest unit of energy?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: PD
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Relativity of Motion in Space
  • From: NovaJoe
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: PD
• Re: The Twins are seen aging Differently on the SAME Platform???
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Relativity of Motion in Space
  • From: NovaJoe
• Re: The Twins are seen aging Differently on the SAME Platform???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Relativity of Motion in Space
  • From: NovaJoe
• Re: The Relativity of Motion in Space
  • From: NovaJoe
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: RP
• Re: The Relativity of Motion in Space
  • From: NovaJoe
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Igor
• The trolls of Norway
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Relativity of Motion in Space
  • From: NovaJoe
• Re: What is the smallest unit of energy?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The Relativity of Motion in Space
  • From: harry
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Relativity of Motion in Space
  • From: NovaJoe
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Evird
• Re: What is the smallest unit of energy?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Relativity of Motion in Space
  • From: NovaJoe
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the smallest unit of energy?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• What is the smallest unit of energy?
  • From: Phil
• Re: An Approximation of G - Extension of previous work
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Relativity of Motion in Space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: PD
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Dono
• Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Twins are seen aging Differently on the SAME Platform???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Proof that Dono LIE about "moving" glass affects light's speed
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Acceleration should cause Time Dilation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Dono
• Re: light sensitive panels...
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: unbulivable inconsistency in high ranked sciencists
  • From: PD
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Proof that Dono LIE about "moving" glass affects light's speed
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Twins are seen aging Differently on the SAME Platform???
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• How to divide by zero, from mathematics of non-life to the formula of big bang
  • From: ExtrêmeAchillès
• Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.
  • From: Saint Isadore Patron Saint of the Internet
• Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Igor
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Igor
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Relativity of Motion in Space
  • From: harry
• Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Tahw
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Twins are seen aging Differently on the SAME Platform???
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Twins are seen aging Differently on the SAME Platform???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Twins are seen aging Differently on the SAME Platform???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Twins are seen aging Differently on the SAME Platform???
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Twins are seen aging Differently on the SAME Platform???
  • From: PD
• Re: unbulivable inconsistency in high ranked sciencists
  • From: PD
• Re: Acceleration should cause Time Dilation
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• The Road to Physics Knowledge
  • From: nbmaia@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Anyone know the following Time Dilation math?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: RP
• Re: The Twins are seen aging Differently on the SAME Platform???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• The Twins are seen aging Differently on the SAME Platform???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Acceleration should cause Time Dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: PD
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: PD
• Re: "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: harry
• Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: The Relativity of Motion in Space
  • From: NovaJoe
• Re: The Relativity of Motion in Space
  • From: RLG
• Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Acceleration should cause Time Dilation
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Acceleration should cause Time Dilation
  • From: NovaJoe
• The Relativity of Motion in Space
  • From: NovaJoe
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: light sensitive panels...
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Acceleration should cause Time Dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Anyone know the following Time Dilation math?
  • From: William Hayes
• Acceleration should cause Time Dilation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: unbulivable inconsistency in high ranked sciencists
  • From: Pmb
• Re: light sensitive panels...
  • From: RP
• Re: unbulivable inconsistency in high ranked sciencists
  • From: NovaJoe
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: RP
• Re: consequently human invented relativity is wrong
  • From: NovaJoe
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Effect of Magnetism on the SpaceTime Field.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: PD
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: PD
• Re: Effect of Magnetism on the SpaceTime Field.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Igor
• Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: self-established relativists dont know their tensors whatsoever
  • From: Igor
• Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Effect of Magnetism on the SpaceTime Field.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• DONO don't know that light's speed in glass is group velocity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Proof that Dono LIE about "moving" glass affects light's speed
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Proof that Dono LIE about "moving" glass affects light's speed
  • From: Dono
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Juan R.
• Proof that Dono LIE about "moving" glass affects light's speed
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 4 of my Java Applet
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet
  • From: Jerry
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment and Lorentz polarization.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Effect of Magnetism on the SpaceTime Field.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: RP
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: RP
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Effect of Magnetism on the SpaceTime Field.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Effect of Magnetism on the SpaceTime Field.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Effect of Magnetism on the SpaceTime Field.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Climate Change Forum
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Climate Change Forum
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Climate Change Forum
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Pmb
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A New Notion Of Damped Harmonic Motion
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Igor
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: PD
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Morf
• Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Juan R.
• Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: light sensitive panels...
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• light sensitive panels...
  • From: neutrino
• Re: Effect of Magnetism on the SpaceTime Field.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Effect of Magnetism on the SpaceTime Field.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Effect of Magnetism on the SpaceTime Field.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: xxein
• Re: Effect of Magnetism on the SpaceTime Field.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Effect of Magnetism on the SpaceTime Field.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Energy Momentum tensor.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A New Notion Of Damped Harmonic Motion
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Effect of Magnetism on the SpaceTime Field.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Sagnac, Coriolis, Shapiro.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Anyone know the following Time Dilation math?
  • From: Androcles
• Dirk VD, OUTTED, a footish Fag.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Effect of Magnetism on the SpaceTime Field.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Twins, from Dr. McCullough.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Igor
• Re: Mechanical model of Sagnac
  • From: guskz
• A New Notion Of Damped Harmonic Motion
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Anyone know the following Time Dilation math?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativistic twins simulation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Ton
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Anyone know the following Time Dilation math?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativistic twins simulation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Relativistic twins simulation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativistic twins simulation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: harry
• Re: Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: PD
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: HeWn
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Energy Momentum tensor.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Energy Momentum tensor.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: PD
• Re: Energy Momentum tensor.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: John Jones
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: Igor
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: Androcles
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Juan R.
• "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Wole
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: harry
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: harry
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: harry
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: penguinista
• Re: MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is it at all possible -- at least in theory -- to violate the second law?
  • From: shalayka
• Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: Androcles
• DONO don't know light's speed in glass is group velocity.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• DONO don't know light's speed in glass is group velocity.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• DONO don't know light speed in glass is group velocity.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: Igor
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
  • From: PD
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: PD
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Igor
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: Igor
• Re: Einstein's 1906 paper
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativistic twins simulation
  • From: Dono
• "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Ploc
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: PD
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's 1906 paper
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: harry
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: harry
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Lorentz' Ether Theory NEVER been disproven.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Relativistic twins simulation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: harry
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: harry
• Re: Einstein's 1906 paper
  • From: harry
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Einstein's 1906 paper
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's 1906 paper
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: PD
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: Dono
• Re: twin relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: John Jones
• Relativistic twins simulation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
  • From: John Jones
• Kerr-Newman-deSitter
  • From: mathengman
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: PD
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: John Jones
• Re: twin relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Difference between physics and mathematics
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: magnetic monopole, homework help
  • From: Randy Poe
• magnetic monopole, homework help
  • From: Dean D
• Re: Double-slit experiment SHOWS the electron is a PARTICLE
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: Dono
• Re: Diffusion by Random Walk
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: Igor
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: harry
• "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Doof
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Origin of the Universe. A criticism.
  • From: kenseto
• Einstein's 1906 paper
  • From: valls
• MMX ***FAILED*** because of HUBBLE
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Energy Momentum tensor.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: harry
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: harry
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: harry
• Re: twin relativity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: harry
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Lorentz' Ether Theory NEVER been disproven.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz' Ether Theory NEVER been disproven.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Lorentz' Ether Theory NEVER been disproven.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Lorentz' Ether Theory NEVER been disproven.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Energy Momentum tensor.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: Igor
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Energy Momentum tensor.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: [no name in subject] - Stop Your Slander
  • From: YBM
• Lorentz' Ether Theory NEVER been disproven.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: [no name in subject] - Stop Your Slander
  • From: YBM
• Re: Energy Momentum tensor.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: how many infinities are there in a black hole
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Question for Koobee about Areas
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: Charlie33
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: LLec
• Re: Question for Koobee about Areas
  • From: PD
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: PD
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: PD
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: PD
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: harry
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: John Jones
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: John Jones
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: harry
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Mr. Messager - Stop Your Slander
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Energy Momentum tensor.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: harry
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Origin of the Universe. A criticism.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Origin of the Universe. A criticism.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Energy Momentum tensor.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: John Jones
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Energy Momentum tensor.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet
  • From: Jerry
• Re: study : real anti-gravity only by inverse geometry
  • From: Igor
• Re: The nail in the coffin for Newtonian and Einsteinian Space
  • From: Igor
• Re: unidentified flying objects defy relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: time is the discrete pat of nature, not energy
  • From: Igor
• The Origin of the Universe. A criticism.
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - A Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: Igor
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: Igor
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: John Jones
• Re: The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Question for Koobee about Areas
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question for Koobee about Areas
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Mr. Messager - Stop Your Slander
  • From: Pmb
• "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Etad
• Mr. Messager - Stop Your Slander
  • From: Etad
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• The failure of modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: John Jones
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: unidentified flying objects defy relativity
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: what is a theory of everything?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: time is the discrete pat of nature, not energy
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: how many infinities are there in a black hole
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: how many infinities are there in a black hole
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question for Koobee about Areas
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Question for Koobee about Areas
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Question for Koobee about Areas
  • From: Dono
• Re: Question for Koobee about Areas
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Question for Koobee about Areas
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Question for Koobee about Areas
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Question for Koobee about Areas
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: Dave Cook
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - A Java Applet
  • From: Dono
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - A Java Applet
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Question for Koobee about Areas
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - A Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Question for Koobee about Areas
  • From: JanPB
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - A Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - A Java Applet
  • From: Jerry
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: what is a theory of everything?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: did einstein stole his tensors?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Etad
• Re: v = cz ?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Randy's friend JCON too dumb to know F= qE(1 + v^2/c^2)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: what is a theory of everything?
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Randy's friend JCON too dumb to know F= qE(1 + v^2/c^2)
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: JCON's physics degree says qE(1 + v^2/c^2) is made up equation!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: JCON's physics degree says qE(1 + v^2/c^2) is made up equation!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Randy's friend JCON too dumb to know F= qE(1 + v^2/c^2)
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The nail in the coffin for Newtonian and Einsteinian Space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: unidentified flying objects defy relativity
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: unidentified flying objects defy relativity
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: PD
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: John Jones
• Re: You guys are WAY behind the times
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Tuv=0 relates to [Fuvw] =0 ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The nail in the coffin for Newtonian and Einsteinian Space
  • From: sal
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: Igor
• Re: Proof that JCON is a Trolling Heckler
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The nail in the coffin for Newtonian and Einsteinian Space
  • From: John Jones
• Re: The nail in the coffin for Newtonian and Einsteinian Space
  • From: sal
• Re: Tuv=0 relates to [Fuvw] =0 ?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Proof that JCON is a Trolling Heckler
  • From: jcon
• Re: JCON's physics degree says qE(1 + v^2/c^2) is made up equation!
  • From: jcon
• Re: JCON's physics degree says qE(1 + v^2/c^2) is made up equation!
  • From: jcon
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: harry
• Proof that JCON is a Trolling Heckler
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: JCON's physics degree says qE(1 + v^2/c^2) is made up equation!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: JCON's physics degree says qE(1 + v^2/c^2) is made up equation!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - A Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tuv=0 relates to [Fuvw] =0 ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: JCON's physics degree says qE(1 + v^2/c^2) is made up equation!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - A Java Applet
  • From: harry
• Re: Proof: Radiation because the Synchrotron is a non-harmonious Atom
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - A Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Proof: Radiation because the Synchrotron is a non-harmonious Atom
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Proof: Radiation because the Synchrotron is non-harmonious Atom
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Hysteris Loss and Potential difference cause Synchrotron Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - A Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: JCON's physics degree says qE(1 + v^2/c^2) is made up equation!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - A Java Applet
  • From: harry
• Re: JCON's physics degree says qE(1 + v^2/c^2) is made up equation!
  • From: jcon
• Re: Christof Koch
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: JCON's physics degree says qE(1 + v^2/c^2) is made up equation!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - A Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• JCON's physics degree says qE(1 + v^2/c^2) is made up equation!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - A Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - A Java Applet
  • From: Dono
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - A Java Applet
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The nail in the coffin for Newtonian and Einsteinian Space
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - A Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - A Java Applet
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: jcon
• JCON's common mistake with Magnetic Deviation Observation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - A Java Applet
  • From: harry
• JCON is making the common mistake with Magnetic Observation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• HEY GUYS! We have a convert! Jerry has Sagnac correct!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - A Java Applet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: You guys are WAY behind the times
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The nail in the coffin for Newtonian and Einsteinian Space
  • From: harry
• Question for Koobee about Areas
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The nail in the coffin for Newtonian and Einsteinian Space
  • From: John Jones
• Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - A Java Applet
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: John Jones
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: harry
• Re: Domestic Science
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Domestic Science
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Article: Physicist defends Einstein's theory and 'speed of gravity' measurement
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The nail in the coffin for Newtonian and Einsteinian Space
  • From: harry
• Re: You guys are WAY behind the times
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: The nail in the coffin for Newtonian and Einsteinian Space
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• The nail in the coffin for Newtonian and Einsteinian Space
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: harry
• Re: You guys are WAY behind the times
  • From: harry
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Tuv=0 relates to [Fuvw] =0 ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Article: Physicist defends Einstein's theory and 'speed of gravity' measurement
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Tuv=0 relates to [Fuvw] =0 ?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: You guys are WAY behind the times
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Tuv=0 relates to [Fuvw] =0 ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Climate Change Forum
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Tuv=0 relates to [Fuvw] =0 ?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Tuv=0 relates to [Fuvw] =0 ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Diffusion by Random Walk
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: AN EINSTEIN DISPROOF FOR DUMMIES (is Copyrighted)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Tuv=0 relates to [Fuvw] =0 ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Tuv=0 relates to [Fuvw] =0 ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Tuv=0 relates to [Fuvw] =0 ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Tuv=0 relates to [Fuvw] =0 ?
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Tuv=0 relates to [Fuvw] =0 ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Tuv=0 relates to [Fuvw] =0 ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: Androcles
• Tuv=0 relates to [Fuvw] =0 ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: v = cz ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: John Jones
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: PD
• Re: Article: Physicist defends Einstein's theory and 'speed of gravity' measurement
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Weak question
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: You guys are WAY behind the times
  • From: harry
• Re: Weak question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: Igor
• Re: Cosmological and local geometry are not related
  • From: Igor
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: Igor
• Weak question
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: Igor
• Re: You guys are WAY behind the times
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: Igor
• Re: You guys are WAY behind the times
  • From: harry
• Re: Weak question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: jcon
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: v = cz ?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: harry
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: harry
• Lorentz's own Law would **END** Einstein's RELATIVITY
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: harry
• Re: v = cz ?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Article: Physicist defends Einstein's theory and 'speed of gravity' measurement
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Androcles
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Diffusion by Random Walk
  • From: sal
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Double-slit experiment SHOWS the electron is a PARTICLE
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Double-slit experiment SHOWS the electron is a PARTICLE
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Hysteris Loss and Potential difference cause Synchrotron Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Diffusion by Random Walk
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Sorry to say: Synchrotron radiation is due to Hysteresis Loss.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sorry to say: Synchrotron radiation is due to Hysteresis Loss.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: PD
• Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Diffusion by Random Walk
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Cosmological and local geometry are not related
  • From: Androcles
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Dono
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Diffusion by Random Walk
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Cosmological and local geometry are not related
  • From: xxein
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: WHO DEFENDS EINSTEIN IDIOCIES?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: v = cz ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: PD
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: PD
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: John Jones
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: PD
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: WHO DEFENDS EINSTEIN IDIOCIES?
  • From: Simple Simon
• Cosmological and local geometry are not related
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: OG
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Double-slit experiment SHOWS the electron is a PARTICLE
  • From: jcon
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: bz
• Re: Diffusion by Random Walk
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Diffusion by Random Walk
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Dono
• Re: Diffusion by Random Walk
  • From: sal
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: PD
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Diffusion by Random Walk
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Double-slit experiment SHOWS the electron is a PARTICLE
  • From: shalayka
• Re: v = cz ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: v = cz ?
  • From: Dono
• Re: v = cz ?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: v = cz ?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: v = cz ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: v = cz ?
  • From: Dono
• Re: v = cz ?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: jcon
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: v = cz ?
  • From: mluttgens
• "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Weiv
• Re: v = cz ?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Sorry to say: Synchrotron radiation is due to Hysteresis Loss.
  • From: harry
• Sorry to say: Synchrotron radiation is due to Hysteresis Loss.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A puzzle
  • From: harry
• Double-slit experiment SHOWS the electron is a PARTICLE
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A Synchrotron Magnetic Force is different from a Wire.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A Synchrotron Magnetic Force is different from a Wire.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: bz
• Re: Relating "c" to the mass of an electron?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Dono
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: bz
• Re: Getting rid of Space
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: OG
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: jcon
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: John Jones
• Getting rid of Space
  • From: John Jones
• Re: v = cz ?
  • From: Dono
• Relating "c" to the mass of an electron?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: OG
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Pmb
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Pmb
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A Synchrotron Magnetic Force is different from a Wire.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: v = cz ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: jcon
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: jcon
• Re: What is science?
  • From: harry
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: PD
• Is there any photos of a single hydrogen atom?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A puzzle
  • From: kenseto
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dono
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: v = cz ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Synchrotron Magnetic Force is different from a Wire.
  • From: jcon
• Re: A Synchrotron Magnetic Force is different from a Wire.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A Synchrotron Magnetic Force is different from a Wire.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A Synchrotron Magnetic Force is different from a Wire.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: What is science?
  • From: harry
• Re: A Synchrotron Magnetic Force is different from a Wire.
  • From: jcon
• "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Weiv
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is science?
  • From: harry
• Re: v = cz ?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Spanning Two Eras of Relativity
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: v = cz ?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: v = cz ?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is science?
  • From: harry
• Re: Debunking Nimtz
  • From: Vern
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: what is a theory of everything?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is science?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dono
• Renormalizable Quantum Gravity?
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Re: A Synchrotron Magnetic Force is different from a Wire.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Jerry
• Re: A Synchrotron Magnetic Force is different from a Wire.
  • From: jcon
• Einstein's General Relativity as a Spin 1 Yang-Mills Theory
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: the self-establishment still dont know their tensors
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: v = cz ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: v = cz ?
  • From: shalayka
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: what is a theory of everything?
  • From: bz
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Nalp
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: PD
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: sal
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: John Jones
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Dono
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Pmb
• Re: v = cz ?
  • From: harry
• v = cz ?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Value of TWLS Is Distance Dependent
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: bz
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: JanPB
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Three Time Puzzles
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einstein's 1905 Sep 27paper?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Jerry
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: How did Einstein get published?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Here's how Synchrotron Magnets cause Radiation
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Pmb
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Examining g0i
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: einstein didnt knew his tensors
  • From: Don Stockbauer