Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - A Java Applet


"Jerry" <Cephalobus_alienus@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1191591440.701691.111020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: On Oct 5, 7:44 am, "Androcles" <Engin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
: > "Jerry" <Cephalobus_alie...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
: >
: > news:1191582738.439292.22790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: > : Hey Guys!
: > :
: > : For my very -first- Java applet, I thought I'd illustrate the
: > : consequences of Ballistic Theory versus the Sagnac experiment.
: > :
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/sagnac/BallisticSagnac.htm
: >
: > Very good animation, Tom and Jerry. You've proved c+v and c-v
: > and the changing phase relation. Just tape a paper window over
: > the screen at any point on the circumference to see it. Well done.
: > To improve the model, add the waves like this:
: > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Sagnac/Sagnac2.JPG
: >
: > and allow a restart or continue indefinitely, like this.
: > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Sagnac/MechSagnac.gif
: >
: > In other words, Emission Theory predicts that the amount of displacement
of
: > the interference fringes is very much affected by the rate of rotation.
: >
:
: Sorry. The clear and unambiguous implication is that
: the phase relationship between the forwards and reverse
: beams is constant in Ballistic Theory.
:
: BALLISTIC THEORY IS DEAD. ANDROCLES AGREES THAT THE
: ILLUSTRATION IS ACCURATE.
:
Henri's BaTh was stillborn, loaded with h-aether, unifuckation, extinction
and fornication, none of which apply to Sagnac or his crazy wedge-on
worbits.

Add this to your code:

Where you have a rotating short line which moves,
int beginX = (int)Math.round(xCenter + 0.90*radius*Math.cos(angle));
int beginY = (int)Math.round(yCenter - 0.90*radius*Math.sin(angle));
int endX = (int)Math.round(xCenter + 1.10*radius*Math.cos(angle));
int endY = (int)Math.round(yCenter - 1.10*radius*Math.sin(angle));
representing the rotating start point, place ANOTHER that does
NOT rotate, representing the fixed eyepoint of the observer.
int beginX = (int)Math.round(xCenter + 0.90*radius*Math.cos(0));
int beginY = (int)Math.round(yCenter - 0.90*radius*Math.sin(0));
int endX = (int)Math.round(xCenter + 1.10*radius*Math.cos(0));
int endY = (int)Math.round(yCenter - 1.10*radius*Math.sin(0));

THAT is where the changing fringe shifts are seen. Grandpa does NOT
ride the carousel and this bloke can get off before it turns or he'll have
a broken head:
http://www.phys.canterbury.ac.nz/research/laser/graphics/zerodorblock1.jpg
http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicles/aureview/1985/may-jun/siuru.html


IN THE FIXED (OR STATIONARY) FRAME OF THE SCREEN,
the amount of displacement of the interference fringes IS AFFECTED.
ANDROCLES AGREES THAT THE ILLUSTRATION IS ACCURATE.
Emission theory is alive and well.



.

Quantcast