Re: Examining g0i

On Oct 5, 12:37 am, Eric Gisse <jowr.pi.nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:12:35 -0700, "Ken S. Tucker"



<dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 4, 4:34 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 4, 1:56 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]

I already posted it

[...]

Where?

I provided diagrams in "Speed of Gravity
and Aberation", and the geodesic solution.
However I will say that one seems to always
be able to replace a 4D nonorthogonal metric
with a 5D orthogonal job with an imaginary axis.
That's along the lines of Kaluza's 5D.

I'm partial to 4D using nonsymmetrical
metric components because it's physically
apparent, via aberration.
That's a Physical-Mathematician's opinion,
instead of a Mathematical-Physicist.

Good Stuff
Ken S. Tucker

eric your equation is "not even wrong",
"ds^2 = dr^2 + r^2 d\theta^2 * (1 - (r*\omega)^2)^-1"
What a wall of bull***. Why do you even post here?
Ken

.

Quantcast