Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
- From: "guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx" <guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 08:51:52 -0700
On Oct 9, 10:13 am, "harry" <harald.vanlintelButNotT...@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
<gu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1191938585.455554.178490@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Oct 9, 8:39 am, "harry" <harald.vanlintelButNotT...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
<gu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1191932604.458915.140730@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Oct 9, 8:02 am, "harry" <harald.vanlintelButNotT...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
<gu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1191930831.076558.98210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Oct 9, 6:55 am, "harry" <harald.vanlintelButNotT...@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
<gu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1191925756.584552.89460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_ether_theory
quote:" Lorentz introduced a strict separation between matter
(electrons) and ether, whereby in his model the ether is
completely
motionless"
-----------------
Rather primitive "motionless ether" deduction:
If glass or air moves at high speeds, light's velocity will
remain
constant in both directions inside these mediums.
Too primitive. Easy to understand with one of the simplest models,
as
used
by for example Michelson: just assume that the index of refraction
is
due to
a retardation (by for example a time dt) in each air molecule.
Harald
Dear Harry, may I call u Harry,
LET is based on electromagnetic principles and NOT the classical
mechanical Ether principles which includes particles and your air
molecule above.
Do you think that molecules don't exist in ether theories? :-)))-
Once again, your "mechanical" molecular behiavor applies to older
mechanical ether theories but not to Lorentz Ether Theory which is
based on electromagnetic principles, NOT MECHANICAL PRINCIPALS.
Do you need a quote???
Well then:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_ether_theory
quote: "The condition of this ether can be described by the electric
field E and the magnetic field H, whereby these fields can be seen as
vibrations in the ether caused by the charges of the electrons. Thus
an electromagnetic ether *****replaces the older mechanical ether
models.************ " end quote.
Now explain how electrons can exist in such an ether, if no particles are
allowed to exist. ;-)-
Firstly please "remember" who is educating who (otherwise you'll keep
complaining).
Asking questions to force people to use their brain is an important means of
educating people.
What "they" (not me) mean in "their" definition above, is that the
ether behaves as an electromagnetic phenomena rather than
mechanical(particle) phenomena. Meaning "they" believe, the ether is
not made up of any micro-substances we call particle (or your
molecule) but the ether CAN CARRY (or allow the existance of) these
particles.
Now you're making progress! Just read again my answer to your question, and
you may understand it this time.
Good luck,
Harald-
You are PATHETIC IDIOT. GO TROLL and HECKLE SOMEONE ELSE.
DUMMY I just told you you can't compare your stupid water molecule to
a Lorentz' electromagnetic Ether which is the topic of this post.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
- From: harry
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
- References:
- Lorentz Ether Theory
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
- From: harry
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
- From: harry
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
- From: harry
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
- From: harry
- Lorentz Ether Theory
- Prev by Date: Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
- Next by Date: Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
- Previous by thread: Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
- Next by thread: Re: Lorentz Ether Theory
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|