Re: consequently human invented relativity is wrong
- From: NovaJoe <relativetheorys@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 01:08:46 -0000
On Oct 14, 6:02 am, drill <i4...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
and now relativity is shown proved wrong in five easy stepsI do not belive relitivity, qm, or black holes are wrong. However, I
1. if evolved life on other planets and / or places in universe
2. ufo must exists, confirming observations every time and every
places
3. ufo use motion and propulsions defying any relativity and physics,
high ranked sciencists want us ta know that they know
4. relativity, qm, black holes, standard model, planks etc are wrong
end of story
do belive the standard model is lacking in understanding i.e. they do
not fully understand the inertia phenomena (universal gravitation/
gravity), which is fundamental to understanding this so called "dark
energy". I do not belive in planks either because the idea of planks
time values are assosiated with a quantum supersurface. This is mumbo
jumbo. However, I am currently righting a book on my views of space-
time under a relativistic view. My deductions have uncovered the
likely motion of the inertia phenomena (gravity) which describes the
functionality of gravity, space-time, the curviture of space in the
presents of mass, as well as describing the functionalty of the
acceleration of the expansion of the universe. I would explain in
detail but I have not yet published my work and can't risk giving out
too much information. However, I have opened a web site in
preperation of publishing my work (http://www.relativetheorys.com).
There you will find more information on my new theory. Feel free to
send me your thoughts or if you have any questions or concerns email
me att quantumpublishing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or
relativetheorys@xxxxxxxxx
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
- Next by Date: Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
- Previous by thread: Re: self-established relativists dont know their tensors whatsoever
- Next by thread: Re: unbulivable inconsistency in high ranked sciencists
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
