Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
- From: "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 02:02:32 +0200
Dr. Henri Wilson skrev:
see: http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/toothwheel.exe
It shows how the two path lengths differ...as do their phases on arrival at the
detector.
Yet another animation showing that the emission theory predicts that
the phases of the waves always will be equal at the detector. :-)
BTW, what's the point with that silly _stationary_ cogwheel?
One question:
What is the phase at the front of your wave?
Does it vary?
Please say yes.
More fun that way.
Paul
.
- References:
- Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
- From: HeWn
- Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
- From: Androcles
- Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
- Prev by Date: Re: Ballistic Theory vs Sagnac - Version 2 of my Java Applet
- Next by Date: Re: relativity hates empirical observations
- Previous by thread: Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
- Next by thread: Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|