Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.


"Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message
news:s3pfh399vvg00bf37eoi3f15bbn6hfqko0@xxxxxxxxxx
: On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:43:56 GMT, "Androcles" <Engineer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
: wrote:
:
: >
: >"Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message
: >news:nnifh3lr8pi9c8t0vf2qjgolnqj8a5eu54@xxxxxxxxxx
:
: >: I was. ...just a minor slip....There is only ONE moving EMISSION point
in
:
: >: >But a gigantic self contradiction never bothered you, did it?
: >:
: >: A comparison of the two methods is given at
: >: http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/ringgyro.htm
: >: All the equations are show. The answers are the same.
: >:
: >: SR actually uses BaTh to get its answer.
: >
: >hahahahahahaha!
:
: see: http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/toothwheel.exe

I did, but I've forgotten the question you have the answer to. Silly me.

: It shows how the two path lengths differ...as do their phases on arrival
at the
: detector.

Yes, I understand path lengths differ, what I do not understand
is why sin(wt + phi) is a rigid rod of length x. This is most mystifying.

: This approach gives the experimentally proved result....so laughing at it
: demonstrates YOUR inability, not mine.

Yes, I'm sure it's all my fault. Please explain why sin(wt +phi)
is a rigid rod.
:
: http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/ringgyro.htm
:
Very pretty. Did you count the rigid rod between S and S'
twice when the tick fairy told you to?


.