Re: Sagnac Fully Supports the BaTh.

Dr. Henri Wilson skrev:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 02:02:32 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen"
<paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dr. Henri Wilson skrev:
see: http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/toothwheel.exe
It shows how the two path lengths differ...as do their phases on arrival at the
detector.
Yet another animation showing that the emission theory predicts that
the phases of the waves always will be equal at the detector. :-)

BTW, what's the point with that silly _stationary_ cogwheel?

...that allows you to count the number of wavelenths in each path.
No matter how fast the wheel rotates, that number stays the same....so there is
no point in rotating it.
One question:
What is the phase at the front of your wave?

.....the phases of the two rays are different when they meet. Check it out by
changing the rotation speed.

You didn't answer the question.
What is the phase at the front of your waves?
Does it vary?


Does it vary?
Please say yes.
More fun that way.

....the source emits photons, not sqiggly lines...

Claiming that:
"the phases of the two rays are different when they meet"
but won't talk about the phases of the rays, eh? :-)

I am asking what the phase of each of two rays is at
the front of your rays.
Does the phase in this point vary as the ray moves?

http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/pdf/sagnac_ring.pdf
http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/pdf/four_mirror_sagnac.pdf

Paul
http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: c+v and Sagnac
    ... So how the rays arrive at the detector are not at all important to Sagnac? ... number of wavelength from the detector back to where the source is now. ... The top line is the rotating frame, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: c+v and Sagnac
    ... But you don't accept that the above condition means that the rays travel ... and in the inertial frame the detector is moving. ... It is the number of wavelengths in each ray BETWEEN THE EMISSION AND END ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: c+v and Sagnac
    ... inertial frame, its separation speed relative to light is not going to be c ... It is the particular object that has 'million of different speeds', a different velocity in every distinct frame of reference. ... on the non-zero instantaneous velocity of the detector. ... So how the rays arrive at the detector are not at all important to Sagnac? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The Emission Theory of Androcles
    ... The light is moving toward the detector in both cases. ... the leading edge of both rays. ... absolute speeds and different directions. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: c+v and Sagnac
    ... But you don't accept that the above condition means that the rays travel ... But the detector is not, so what you say about this imaginary stationary ... The inertial frame doesn't rotate and is at rest. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)