Re: Can we see the twin dying?
- From: Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:29:00 -0500
Sid wrote:
"Tom Roberts" <tjroberts137@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:M6dVi.2510$%Z2.1821@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNegative muons captured in a muonic atom (a mu- replaces an e-) decay more rapidly than do free muons. The lifetime of an AL-mu atom is about 0.88 us (the free muon lifetime is 2.2 us; the muons in a storage ring are "free" as far as decay rate is concerned).Why would the muon in a muonic atom decay more rapidly?
I'm not sure of the details, only that weak interactions with the nucleus are involved. Higher Z => shorter lifetime.
What is an AL-muon atom? What does AL stand for?
typo: I meant Al, aluminum.
Also, when you say ''the free muon lifetime is 2.2 us'' I guess you mean a free muon at rest (as opposed to a ''free muon'' moving in a storage ring).
Yes, of course. We always describe the properties of a particle (lifetime, mass, charge, spin, ...) in its rest frame, unless explicitly stated otherwise.
Tom Roberts
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can we see the twin dying?
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Can we see the twin dying?
- References:
- Can we see the twin dying?
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Can we see the twin dying?
- From: Tom Roberts
- Can we see the twin dying?
- Prev by Date: 3rd Verdict, the CONTINU-UM
- Next by Date: Re: The Nanometre Twin
- Previous by thread: Re: Can we see the twin dying?
- Next by thread: Re: Can we see the twin dying?
- Index(es):