Re: calculous in the curve space theorem 3



On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:23:18 -0700, caoyanwh2003 wrote:

Cao's theorem 3
From when x→0 there are sin x=x, ex-1=x, ln(1+x)=x, (1+x)^а-1=аx, we
can conclude follow theorem
1, ∵sin dx=dx

∴ ∫sin dx dx=∫dxdx=1

As written, that's wrong. The integral of an infinitesimal value is
zero. You've got the integral of dx^2:

∫(dx)^2

and that's zero, not 1, over any finite interval of integration.

To see this more clearly, look at the limit which defines the (Riemann)
integral, taking the integral of (dx)^2 from "a" to "b":

lim_{n->infty} [ sum_0^{n-1} (((b-a)/n)^2) ]

The summands are all the same value, so we can replace the sum with
multiplication by the number of terms in the sum:

lim_{n->infty} [ n * (((b-a)/n)^2) ]

Multiplying out, that's:

lim_{n->infty} [ (b-a)^2/n ]

and that's certainly zero.

Of course your whole notion of infinitesimals seems to be very half-
baked, as well. It's never the case that "sin dx = dx" for nonzero dx.
Rather, if dx is infinitesimal, then sin(dx) - dx ~ dx^2. That is, in
simple terms, the difference between sin(dx) and dx is doubly
infinitesimal, but it's never zero, save when dx == 0.



2, ∵ edx-1=dx

∴ ∫(edx-1)dx=∫dxdx=1

3, ∵ ln(1+dx)=dx

∴ ∫ln(1+dx)dx=∫dxdx=1

4, ∵ (1+dx)^а-1=аdx

∴ ∫[(1+dx)^а-1]dx=∫аdxdx=а∫dxdx=а

These all can show even if a very tiny digital such as dx in the
integral formula, we cann't deal it with 0 and then calculate them
again, that is incorrect. Because even if a very tiny digital such as
dx→0 , as after we calculate the integral formula , it is a number that
cann't be ignored. The 4 can explain it throughly. 2007-10-31



--
Nospam becomes physicsinsights to fix the email
I can be also contacted through http://www.physicsinsights.org
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: calculous in the curve space theorem 3
    ... and that's zero, not 1, over any finite interval of integration. ... Of course your whole notion of infinitesimals seems to be very half- ... ratios of the rate at which x and sin"incline to zero" goes to 1. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
    ... |>|>| during this race is zero, ... |>|>velocity, you stupid cunt, and the velocity is zero. ... |>We know that already, neither does Phuckwit Duck. ... you'll never understand integration. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: A question on Diracs GR book
    ... Now you can use Stokes theorem / integration by parts, ... vector field over a region is equal to the integral of the normal ... then the RHS of Stokes theorem is trivially zero. ... infinity" sufficiently fast, so the boundary integral can be taken to ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: A question on Diracs GR book
    ... how does this fit with what Dirac is saying? ... meant to say that the variation of that integral is zero, ... The integral in question _is_ the variation, ... Abandon "integration by parts", it is confusing you. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: calculous in the curve space theorem 3
    ... and that's zero, not 1, over any finite interval of integration. ... Of course your whole notion of infinitesimals seems to be very half- ... What about case when dx and sindx like a function cannot expres ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)

Quantcast