sci.physics.relativity
- why they cant put their finger on it and say "look, this side is contracted",
rotten egg
- "Causality",
Evig
- Re: OT: Copyrightability of Ideas (Was: Re: The Aether... (where Physics meets Philosophy)),
dwhig265
- Re: Copyrightability of Ideas (Was: Re: The Aether... (where Physics meets Philosophy)),
Androcles
- Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?,
Simon G Best
- secrets of relativity,
VinegarTasters@xxxxxxxxx
- Question about time dilation,
LuckyE
- while only matter tells space-time how to curve, why are they fooling us?,
nagasane kotetsu
- Is It Worth Asking Real Questions Here?,
Simon G Best
- Orbital precession w/o GR,
dr_strangelove
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Androcles
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Androcles
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Androcles
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Androcles
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Androcles
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Androcles
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
bz
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
bz
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
bz
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Dono
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Dono
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Dono
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Dono
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
shalayka
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Dono
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
shalayka
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
dr_strangelove
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
dr_strangelove
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Dono
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Androcles
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Dono
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
dr_strangelove
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Androcles
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Dono
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Dono
- conversion from relativity,
nagasane kotetsu
- einstein is right even when he says is wrong,
nagasane kotetsu
- relativity is done entirely by intuition, no computer modeling and simulation needed, they say,
mikado
- Kepler and his sequiplicate proportion,
oriel36
- "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality",
Evig
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
Dono
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
colleesh
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
colleesh
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
dlzc
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
colleesh
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
Dono
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
Dono
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
Pmb
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
colleesh
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
Dono
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
colleesh
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
Dono
- Frame question,
Peri of Pera
- Re: EINSHTEIN I SCHMACKA YOURA FACE,
Dono
- maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
mikado
- Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
dlzc
- Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
Dono
- Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
Igor
- Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
mikado
- Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
Sanders Kaufman
- Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
nagasane kotetsu
- Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
Sanders Kaufman
- Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
nagasane kotetsu
- Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
Igor
- Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
JanPB
- how does relativity relates to infinities, are there single infinity or set of infinities inside other infinities?,
mikado
- Re: what makes relativity true, in order to hide from us the real science and a real truth we cant handle?,
AltSci
- Re: do we have space and time for real?,
Don Stockbauer
- "Is String Theory Justified?",
Evig
- A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
John Kennaugh
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
harry
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
kenseto
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
harry
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
oriel36
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
harry
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
oriel36
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
oriel36
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
harry
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
kenseto
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
harry
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
oriel36
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
JanPB
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
JanPB
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
Androcles
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
Randy Poe
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
Androcles
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
mikado
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
Androcles
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
mikado
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
Androcles
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
nagasane kotetsu
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
mikado
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
JanPB
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
nagasane kotetsu
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
JanPB
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
mikado
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
mikado
- Re: is the truth of physics hidden in black holes?,
Dono
- Calculazions within a inertial system.,
Josef Matz
I have an alternative answer to any question coserning SRT,
AltSci
Re: GETTING RID OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY,
Bryan Olson
Robert Frost's Poetry and the Theory of General Relativity,
Bill A
The unknown duality of truth.,
Caesar J. B. Squitti
"The Properties of the Aether",
Krow
Re: MI5 Persecution: .net Magazine Applauds my Website (12349),
Don Stockbauer
Re: what or who imposed relativity in this universe,
Dono
how a photon can travel so long way?,
izmirli
Farce of Quantum Gravity,
Murphy
Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
Question about gravity (curved space?),
LuckyE
Re: Question about gravity (curved space?),
Androcles
Re: Question about gravity (curved space?),
Tom Roberts
Re: Question about gravity (curved space?),
Neil Bates
Re: Question about gravity (curved space?),
LuckyE
Re: Question about gravity (curved space?),
Koobee Wublee
Re: Question about gravity (curved space?),
adam . trepczynski
Re: Question about gravity (curved space?),
Traveler
Re: Question about gravity (curved space?),
RP
Re: how does a coherent standing wave light still propagate at a speed c++?,
Sue...
"The Arrow of Time",
Krow
Yet another Sagnac animation.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: Yet another Sagnac animation.,
bz
Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
RP
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Dono
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Sue...
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Sue...
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Sue...
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Sue...
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Sue...
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Sue...
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Sue...
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Sue...
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Sue...
A challenge to SR experts,
mluttgens
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
Dono
- Message not available
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
Dono
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
mluttgens
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
Dono
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
mluttgens
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
Dono
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
mluttgens
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
Dono
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
mluttgens
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
Dono
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
Dono
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
Dono
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
mluttgens
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
Dono
- Message not available
johnreed - The Universe and the Mathematics Part 5,
johnlawrencereedjr
a johnreed take - Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe? Part 2,
johnlawrencereedjr
a johnreed take - Is Mass an Emergent quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe? Part 1,
johnlawrencereedjr
Re: how does an atom emit white depolarized incoherent light?,
OG
Re: what does an atom with its own energy level in order to emit light?,
Igor
Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
harry
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
kenseto
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Josef Matz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
kenseto
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
kenseto
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Cosmik de Bris
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
harry
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Cosmik de Bris
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Cosmik de Bris
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
dlzc
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
kenseto
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Androcles
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Cosmik de Bris
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Cosmik de Bris
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
harry
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
harry
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
harry
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
harry
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
harry
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
harry
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
AltSci
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
shuba
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Cosmik de Bris
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Cosmik de Bris
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Cosmik de Bris
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Cosmik de Bris
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Androcles
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
AltSci
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Message not available
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Androcles
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
kenseto
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Androcles
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
harry
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
harry
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Cosmik de Bris
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
kenseto
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Androcles
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Androcles
Re: The real twin paradox.,
mluttgens
Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
Re: The real twin paradox.,
AltSci
Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
Re: how does a coherent standing wave light still propagate at a speed c++?,
Tom Roberts
"The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism",
Krow
special relativity,
evabern
Re: how does light know that space in front of it is curved, in order to be attracted in a black hole?,
Androcles
Re: how does light know that space in front of it is curved, in order to be attracted in a black hole?,
Traveler
Do muons prove SRT ?,
xray4abc
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
bz
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Sue...
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
bz
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Sue...
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
bz
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Sue...
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
bz
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Sue...
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
bz
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Dono
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Dono
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Dono
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Dono
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
bz
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
bz
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Dono
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Sue...
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Sue...
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
xray4abc
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
bz
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Sue...
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Sue...
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
bz
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
dlzc
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Sue...
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
dlzc
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Sue...
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
bz
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
xray4abc
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
bz
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
harry
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Androcles
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
harry
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Androcles
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Sue...
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
harry
Relativity in Curved Spacetime - Review,
Eric Baird
ABOUT THE LAWS OF THE MECHANICS,
Stamenin
sciencific proof of higher dimension and higher vibration,
u84uog
Re: light pulses 10000x smaller than wavelength of light itself !!?,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Muon Question,
Peri of Pera
- Re: Muon Question,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Muon Question,
Androcles
- Re: Muon Question,
harry
- Re: Muon Question,
Sue...
- Re: Muon Question,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Muon Question,
Sue...
- Re: Muon Question,
dlzc
- Re: Muon Question,
Sue...
- Re: Muon Question,
harry
- Re: Muon Question,
Sue...
- Re: Muon Question,
harry
- Re: Muon Question,
Sue...
- Re: Muon Question,
Sue...
- Re: Muon Question,
harry
- Re: Muon Question,
Sue...
- Re: Muon Question,
harry
- Re: Muon Question,
Sue...
- Re: Muon Question,
harry
- Re: Muon Question,
bz
- Re: Muon Question,
PD
Relativistic rocket formulae,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
mluttgens
- Message not available
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
alanmc95210@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
alanmc95210@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Message not available
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
Dono
Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
Dono
"magnetospheric thermodynamics",
Ken S. Tucker
"Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations",
Krow
Re: what is the relationship between light and gravity?,
RP
"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2",
Krow
At Last! MI-5 Persecution has discovered sci.physics.relativity,
Sancho's Atomic Trousers
internal energy contributing to mass,
Jean Paul
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
Sue...
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
sal
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
Androcles
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
sal
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
sal
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
dlzc
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
bz
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
Jean Paul
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
Jean Paul
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
Daryl McCullough
Re: what gravity we have at the center of earth?,
Don Stockbauer
Re: what property of relativity makes the universe binary?,
Daryl McCullough
newbie says hi,
Ross Tucker
Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Dono
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee