sci.physics.relativity
- why they cant put their finger on it and say "look, this side is contracted",
rotten egg
- "Causality",
Evig
- Re: OT: Copyrightability of Ideas (Was: Re: The Aether... (where Physics meets Philosophy)),
dwhig265
- Re: Copyrightability of Ideas (Was: Re: The Aether... (where Physics meets Philosophy)),
Androcles
- Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?,
Simon G Best
- secrets of relativity,
VinegarTasters@xxxxxxxxx
- Question about time dilation,
LuckyE
- while only matter tells space-time how to curve, why are they fooling us?,
nagasane kotetsu
- Is It Worth Asking Real Questions Here?,
Simon G Best
- Orbital precession w/o GR,
dr_strangelove
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Androcles
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Androcles
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Androcles
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Androcles
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Androcles
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Androcles
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
bz
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
bz
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
bz
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Dono
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Dono
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Dono
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Dono
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
shalayka
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Dono
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
shalayka
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
dr_strangelove
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
dr_strangelove
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Dono
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Androcles
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Dono
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
dr_strangelove
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Androcles
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Dono
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR,
Dono
- conversion from relativity,
nagasane kotetsu
- einstein is right even when he says is wrong,
nagasane kotetsu
- relativity is done entirely by intuition, no computer modeling and simulation needed, they say,
mikado
- Kepler and his sequiplicate proportion,
oriel36
- "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality",
Evig
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
Dono
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
colleesh
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
colleesh
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
dlzc
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
colleesh
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
Dono
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
Dono
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
Pmb
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
colleesh
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
Dono
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
colleesh
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA,
Dono
- Frame question,
Peri of Pera
- Re: EINSHTEIN I SCHMACKA YOURA FACE,
Dono
- maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
mikado
- Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
dlzc
- Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
Dono
- Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
Igor
- Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
mikado
- Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
Sanders Kaufman
- Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
nagasane kotetsu
- Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
Sanders Kaufman
- Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
nagasane kotetsu
- Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
Igor
- Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure,
JanPB
- how does relativity relates to infinities, are there single infinity or set of infinities inside other infinities?,
mikado
- Re: what makes relativity true, in order to hide from us the real science and a real truth we cant handle?,
AltSci
- Re: do we have space and time for real?,
Don Stockbauer
- "Is String Theory Justified?",
Evig
- A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
John Kennaugh
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
harry
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
kenseto
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
harry
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
oriel36
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
harry
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
oriel36
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
oriel36
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
harry
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
kenseto
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
harry
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
oriel36
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
JanPB
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
JanPB
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
Androcles
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
Randy Poe
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
Androcles
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
mikado
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
Androcles
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
mikado
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
Androcles
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
nagasane kotetsu
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
mikado
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
JanPB
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
nagasane kotetsu
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
JanPB
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
mikado
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?,
mikado
- Re: is the truth of physics hidden in black holes?,
Dono
- Calculazions within a inertial system.,
Josef Matz
I have an alternative answer to any question coserning SRT,
AltSci
Re: GETTING RID OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY,
Bryan Olson
Robert Frost's Poetry and the Theory of General Relativity,
Bill A
The unknown duality of truth.,
Caesar J. B. Squitti
"The Properties of the Aether",
Krow
Re: MI5 Persecution: .net Magazine Applauds my Website (12349),
Don Stockbauer
Re: what or who imposed relativity in this universe,
Dono
how a photon can travel so long way?,
izmirli
Farce of Quantum Gravity,
Murphy
Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
Question about gravity (curved space?),
LuckyE
Re: Question about gravity (curved space?),
Androcles
Re: Question about gravity (curved space?),
Tom Roberts
Re: Question about gravity (curved space?),
Neil Bates
Re: Question about gravity (curved space?),
LuckyE
Re: Question about gravity (curved space?),
Koobee Wublee
Re: Question about gravity (curved space?),
adam . trepczynski
Re: Question about gravity (curved space?),
Traveler
Re: Question about gravity (curved space?),
RP
Re: how does a coherent standing wave light still propagate at a speed c++?,
Sue...
"The Arrow of Time",
Krow
Yet another Sagnac animation.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: Yet another Sagnac animation.,
bz
Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
RP
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Dono
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Sue...
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Sue...
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Sue...
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Sue...
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Sue...
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Sue...
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Sue...
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Sue...
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field,
Sue...
A challenge to SR experts,
mluttgens
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
Dono
- Message not available
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
Dono
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
mluttgens
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
Dono
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
mluttgens
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
Dono
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
mluttgens
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
Dono
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
mluttgens
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
Dono
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
Dono
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
Dono
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
mluttgens
- Re: A challenge to SR experts,
Dono
- Message not available
johnreed - The Universe and the Mathematics Part 5,
johnlawrencereedjr
a johnreed take - Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe? Part 2,
johnlawrencereedjr
a johnreed take - Is Mass an Emergent quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe? Part 1,
johnlawrencereedjr
Re: how does an atom emit white depolarized incoherent light?,
OG
Re: what does an atom with its own energy level in order to emit light?,
Igor
Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
harry
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
kenseto
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Josef Matz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
kenseto
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
kenseto
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Cosmik de Bris
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
harry
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Cosmik de Bris
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Cosmik de Bris
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
dlzc
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
kenseto
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Androcles
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Cosmik de Bris
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Cosmik de Bris
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
harry
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
harry
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
harry
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
harry
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
harry
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
harry
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
AltSci
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
shuba
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Cosmik de Bris
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Cosmik de Bris
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Cosmik de Bris
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Cosmik de Bris
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Androcles
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
AltSci
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Message not available
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Androcles
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
kenseto
- Re: The real real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Androcles
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
harry
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
harry
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Cosmik de Bris
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Dono
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
kenseto
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Androcles
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.,
Androcles
Re: The real twin paradox.,
mluttgens
Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
Re: The real twin paradox.,
AltSci
Re: The real twin paradox.,
colp
Re: how does a coherent standing wave light still propagate at a speed c++?,
Tom Roberts
"The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism",
Krow
special relativity,
evabern
Re: how does light know that space in front of it is curved, in order to be attracted in a black hole?,
Androcles
Re: how does light know that space in front of it is curved, in order to be attracted in a black hole?,
Traveler
Do muons prove SRT ?,
xray4abc
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
bz
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Sue...
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
bz
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Sue...
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
bz
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Sue...
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
bz
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Sue...
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
bz
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Dono
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Dono
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Dono
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Dono
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
bz
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
bz
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Dono
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Sue...
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Sue...
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
xray4abc
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
bz
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Sue...
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Sue...
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
bz
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
dlzc
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Sue...
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
dlzc
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Sue...
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
bz
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
xray4abc
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
bz
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
harry
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Androcles
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
harry
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Androcles
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
Sue...
- Re: Do muons prove SRT ?,
harry
Relativity in Curved Spacetime - Review,
Eric Baird
ABOUT THE LAWS OF THE MECHANICS,
Stamenin
sciencific proof of higher dimension and higher vibration,
u84uog
Re: light pulses 10000x smaller than wavelength of light itself !!?,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Muon Question,
Peri of Pera
- Re: Muon Question,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Muon Question,
Androcles
- Re: Muon Question,
harry
- Re: Muon Question,
Sue...
- Re: Muon Question,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Muon Question,
Sue...
- Re: Muon Question,
dlzc
- Re: Muon Question,
Sue...
- Re: Muon Question,
harry
- Re: Muon Question,
Sue...
- Re: Muon Question,
harry
- Re: Muon Question,
Sue...
- Re: Muon Question,
Sue...
- Re: Muon Question,
harry
- Re: Muon Question,
Sue...
- Re: Muon Question,
harry
- Re: Muon Question,
Sue...
- Re: Muon Question,
harry
- Re: Muon Question,
bz
- Re: Muon Question,
PD
Relativistic rocket formulae,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
mluttgens
- Message not available
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
alanmc95210@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
alanmc95210@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Message not available
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
Dono
Re: Relativistic rocket formulae,
Dono
"magnetospheric thermodynamics",
Ken S. Tucker
"Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations",
Krow
Re: what is the relationship between light and gravity?,
RP
"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2",
Krow
At Last! MI-5 Persecution has discovered sci.physics.relativity,
Sancho's Atomic Trousers
internal energy contributing to mass,
Jean Paul
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
Sue...
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
sal
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
Androcles
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
sal
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
sal
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
dlzc
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
bz
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
Jean Paul
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
Jean Paul
- Re: internal energy contributing to mass,
Daryl McCullough
Re: what gravity we have at the center of earth?,
Don Stockbauer
Re: what property of relativity makes the universe binary?,
Daryl McCullough
newbie says hi,
Ross Tucker
Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Dono
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Dono
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
JanPB
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
JanPB
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
JanPB
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
JanPB
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
JanPB
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
JanPB
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Dono
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
JanPB
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
JanPB
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
JanPB
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
JanPB
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Dono
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Dono
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
bz
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
shalayka
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: gravity dipole proof, what permitivity and permeability in a wormhole?,
Igor
"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1",
Krow
Does propagation delay give rise to time dialation?,
blackhead
Re: how much intuition and mathematics is needed in relativity?,
Don Stockbauer
Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com ),
Eric Baird
"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website",
Krow
Re: NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY?,
Eric Gisse
what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
Jean Paul
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
Sue...
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
Pmb
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
dwhig265
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
bz
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
dwhig265
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
bz
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
Pmb
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
bz
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
Pmb
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
bz
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
dwhig265
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
Pmb
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
bz
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
dwhig265
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
Pmb
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
dwhig265
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
dwhig265
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
bz
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
dwhig265
- Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: Guidelines for effective USENET scientific discussion,
bz
"The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
Krow
Introduction to the theory of gravitation,
Michal Witkowski
Jean Piere Messager's Slander,
Clew
"The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity",
Clew
Re: relativity wrong as predicted by me many times - ufo,
Dono
Re: GR1916, available online.,
Daryl McCullough
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Sue...
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Sue...
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Sue...
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Alen
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Alen
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
bz
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Alen
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Alen
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Alen
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Alen
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Pmb
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Sue...
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Sue...
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: GR1916, available online.,
Koobee Wublee
Re: Time to overhaul Newton's Theory of Gravitation? (Forwarded),
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
The Structure of Atoms as Interpreted by Model Mechanics,
kenseto
Re: where is the muon contracted in only one direction,
Androcles
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: where is the muon contracted in only one direction,
Darwin123
Re: where is the muon contracted in only one direction,
Dono
"Corrections to Special Relativity",
Evird
Re: The theoretical problem of action at a distance,
John Kennaugh
Einstein's last words: "Ich habe meine Sache hier getan",
Albertito
Need Help -Conservation of Momentum question!!!,
xandergiles1
relativity on their CV?,
cable
The Aether and Being,
Laurent
gravity is acoustics of the universe,
cable
enormous contradiction, do they know their tensors?,
cable
On the Fundamental Forces as Measures of Particle Exchange over Differing Scales of Time,
shalayka
Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version,
Phil
relativity predicts deformations which are not real,
cable
"Gravity",
Evird
McCullough's requested proof.,
Androcles
and another theory which almost makes sense,
cable
time dilation is actually splitted time,
cable
what length contraction in only one direction?,
cable
Re: what length contraction in only one direction?,
Igor
Re: what length contraction in only one direction?,
Autymn D. C.
- Re: what length contraction in only one direction?,
cable
- Re: what length contraction in only one direction?,
Stamenin
- Re: what length contraction in only one direction?,
Dono
- Re: what length contraction in only one direction?,
cable
- Re: what length contraction in only one direction?,
Dono
- Re: what length contraction in only one direction?,
Stamenin
- Re: what length contraction in only one direction?,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: what length contraction in only one direction?,
Igor
- Re: what length contraction in only one direction?,
Stamenin
- Re: what length contraction in only one direction?,
Stamenin
- Re: what length contraction in only one direction?,
Igor
- Re: what length contraction in only one direction?,
Stamenin
- Re: what length contraction in only one direction?,
Igor
- Re: what length contraction in only one direction?,
Stamenin
- Re: what length contraction in only one direction?,
Igor
Re: what length contraction in only one direction?,
Dono
Re: what length contraction in only one direction?,
Darwin123
Message not available
Message not available
Message not availableRe: what length contraction in only one direction?,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: what length contraction in only one direction?,
bz
impossible observation of length contraction,
cable
relativity is perpetum mobiile,
cable
"Relativity and Reasonableness Tests",
Evird
Re: MORPHOGENESIS,
xxein
Epiphany IaSNe,
dwhig265
How many dimensions are there?,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
PD
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
PD
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
PD
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
bz
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
bz
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Traveler
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Androcles
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
bz
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Traveler
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Dono
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
dlzc
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
dlzc
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
dlzc
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
bz
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
bz
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Tom Roberts
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Paul B. Andersen
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: How many dimensions are there?,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: How many dimensions are there?,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: How many dimensions are there?,
K_h
- Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: How many dimensions are there?,
K_h
- Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: How many dimensions are there?,
K_h
- Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: How many dimensions are there?,
K_h
- Re: How many dimensions are there?,
Gerald L. O'Barr
accelerated electrons in my CRT,
cable
Ahhhh....what ever happened to BILGE????,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Examining Mathematical Approaches",
Evird
Bertie 2,
Peri of Pera
Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
sal
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Androcles
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Androcles
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
sal
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
cable
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Androcles
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Androcles
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Androcles
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Androcles
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Androcles
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Androcles
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Androcles
- Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).,
Eric Gisse
Re: http://theorie-test.blogspot.com/,
JR
In 1861, Maxwell derived Magnetic Curl using Coriolis Force,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
"The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light",
Eriw
ERICA,Igor,RP,PMB are WRONG about Coriolis & Magnetism similarity,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
RF antenna emitting photons,
Gert Baars
Re: RF antenna emitting photons,
Bill Hobba
Message not available
Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?,
Peter Moore
- Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?,
Androcles
- Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?,
Ben Rudiak-Gould
- Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?,
Peter Moore
- Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?,
Androcles
- Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?,
Peter Moore
- Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?,
Androcles
- Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?,
Peter Moore
- Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?,
Androcles
- Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?,
Peter Moore
- Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?,
Androcles
- Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?,
Peter Moore
- Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?,
Androcles
- Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?,
Peter Moore
- Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?,
Androcles
- Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?,
Alen
Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces,
sirius184
Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time,
kenseto
- Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time,
kenseto
- Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time,
OG
- Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time,
kenseto
- Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time,
OG
- Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time,
kenseto
- Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time,
OG
- Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time,
kenseto
- Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time,
OG
- Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time,
PD
- Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time,
kenseto
- Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time,
Dono
- Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time,
OG
- Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time,
kenseto
- Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time,
Dono
Your feedback is welcome,
JR
"The Einstein Hoax",
Eriw
Oh Dono: Tom, Randy and PD are insulting you.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Don Stockbauer
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Eric Gisse
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Eric Gisse
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Tom Roberts
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Androcles
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Dono
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Dono
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Dono
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Eric Gisse
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Eric Gisse
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Eric Gisse
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Eric Gisse
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Eric Gisse
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Eric Gisse
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Eric Gisse
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Eric Gisse
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Eric Gisse
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Eric Gisse
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Eric Gisse
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Eric Gisse
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Eric Gisse
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Eric Gisse
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
BradGuth
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame),
Eric Gisse
Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
Gert Baars
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
Androcles
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
Don Stockbauer
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
Peri of Pera
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
Androcles
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
Peri of Pera
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
harry
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
Androcles
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
Peri of Pera
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
nessunoic
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
Androcles
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
harry
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
nessunoic
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
nessunoic
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
nessunoic
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
harry
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
nessunoic
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
harry
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
nessunoic
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
Sue...
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
nessunoic
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
shuba
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
kenseto
- Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery,
harry
distribution functions+special relativity,
evabern
Re: proof for instantaneous information speed,
William Hayes
c + v = c, their tensors sucks,
cable
- Re: c + v = c, their tensors sucks,
BernardZ
- Re: c + v = c, their tensors sucks,
Sancho's Atomic Trousers
- <Possible follow-ups>
- c + v = c, their tensors sucks,
cable
- Re: c + v = c, their tensors sucks,
nessunoic
- Re: c + v = c, their tensors sucks,
cable
- Re: c + v = c, their tensors sucks,
nessunoic
- Re: c + v = c, their tensors sucks,
cable
- Re: c + v = c, their tensors sucks,
nessunoic
- Re: c + v = c, their tensors sucks,
cable
Second time dimension,
M Winther
Message not availableRe: Second time dimension,
Traveler
slow-down or speed-up paradox?,
nessunoic
Dimensional Analysis,
shalayka
Re: Mathematical Modelling,
johnlawrencereedjr
How fast gravity well re-adjusts ?,
nessunoic
Re: relativists put gravity in a flagrant contradiction,
nessunoic
Re: laboratory watch shows same time for both twins,
nessunoic
"The Brilliance of Our Teachers",
Eriw
UK scientists working towards a redefinition of the kilogram,
kevin . james9
Journal of Gravitational Physics Call for Papers,
jgp.editor@xxxxxxxxx
Re: Can we see the twin dying?,
nessunoic
Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
John Kennaugh
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
bz
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
John Kennaugh
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
bz
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
nessunoic
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
bz
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
John Kennaugh
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
bz
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
John Kennaugh
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
bz
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
John Kennaugh
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
bz
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
John Kennaugh
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
bz
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS,
Stamenin
Re: Confusion in Expanding Confusion,
dwhig265
Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself,
Wings of Truth
Re: Magnetic Field During Motion,
Simple Simon
A Problem with Relativity ?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Causality Paradox Question,
Peter Moore
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
dlzc
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Peter Moore
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
dlzc
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Peter Moore
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Peter Moore
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Peter Moore
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Peter Moore
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
bz
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Peter Moore
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
bz
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Peter Moore
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
dlzc
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Simple Simon
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Peter Moore
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
bz
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
bz
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
dlzc
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Peter Moore
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
dlzc
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
harry
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Peter Moore
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Peter Moore
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Peter Moore
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
harry
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Peter Moore
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
harry
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Peter Moore
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
dlzc
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
harry
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
nessunoic
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Ben Rudiak-Gould
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Peter Moore
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
xxein
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
nessunoic
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
xxein
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
xxein
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
xxein
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Sue...
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
xxein
- Re: Causality Paradox Question,
Martin Hogbin
"The Right Angle Lever Paradox",
Eriw
kinetic energy trtansformation,
evabern
Re: IGOR is having a BIG HALLOWEEN PARTY,
Sancho's Atomic Trousers
Re: calculous in the curve space theorem 3,
Joro
Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
dlzc
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
bz
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
bz
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Eric Gisse
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Dono
- Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.,
Dono
Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Androcles
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Shubee
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Shubee
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Phil
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Juan R.
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Juan R.
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Juan R.
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Juan R.
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
bz
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Pmb
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
bz
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
bz
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
bz
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Juan R.
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
Dono
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
- Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity,
harry
Journal of Gravitational Physics,
alexis
Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
nessunoic
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Cosmik de Bris
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Paul B. Andersen
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Alen
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Phil
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Androcles
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Androcles
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Androcles
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Androcles
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Dono
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Androcles
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Dono
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
RP
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Androcles
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
RP
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Androcles
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
RP
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Androcles
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Androcles
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Sue...
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Androcles
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Sue...
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Sue...
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Sue...
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others,
Dono
Re: Is Time dilation Real???,
Dono
Re: Simple question,
xxein
- Re: Simple question,
Androcles
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Simple question,
kenseto
- Re: Simple question,
kenseto
- Re: Simple question,
PD
- Re: Simple question,
nessunoic
- Re: Simple question,
nessunoic
- Re: Simple question,
Androcles
- Re: Simple question,
nessunoic
- Re: Simple question,
Androcles
- Re: Simple question,
nessunoic
- Re: Simple question,
Androcles
- Re: Simple question,
nessunoic
- Re: Simple question,
Androcles
- Re: Simple question,
nessunoic
- Re: Simple question,
Androcles
- Re: Simple question,
nessunoic
- Re: Simple question,
Androcles
- Re: Simple question,
Sue...
- Re: Simple question,
bz
- Re: Simple question,
kenseto
- Re: Simple question,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Message not available
Message not available
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not available
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
The Ghost In The Machine
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Dono
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
The Ghost In The Machine
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Dono
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Dono
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not available
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not available
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Jeering Jeery the minor crank.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Jeering Jeery the minor crank.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Jeering Jeery the minor crank.,
Jerry
Re: Jeering Jeery the minor crank.,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: Jeering Jeery the minor crank.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Jeering Jeery the minor crank.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Jeering Jeery the minor crank.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Jeering Jeery the minor crank.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Jeering Jeery the minor crank.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Jeering Jeery the minor crank.,
Jerry
Re: Jeering Jeery the minor crank.,
William Hayes
Re: Jeering Jeery the minor crank.,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Dono
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Re: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: Sagnac Threads United,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Peri of Pera
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
nessunoic
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Androcles
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
nessunoic
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
bz
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
bz
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
bz
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
bz
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
bz
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
bz
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Androcles
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
bz
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Androcles
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Androcles
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Androcles
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Androcles
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
bz
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Androcles
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Peri of Pera
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Androcles
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Androcles
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Peri of Pera
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Androcles
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Peri of Pera
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Androcles
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Peri of Pera
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Androcles
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Peri of Pera
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Androcles
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Peri of Pera
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Androcles
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Peri of Pera
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Androcles
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Androcles
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Bryan Olson
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Androcles
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
bz
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
bz
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
bz
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
bz
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin,
nessunoic
Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?",
Don Stockbauer
