sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: shalayka
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is It Worth Asking Real Questions Here?
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• why they cant put their finger on it and say "look, this side is contracted"
  • From: rotten egg
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: secrets of relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: JMA
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: JMA
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: JMA
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: JMA
• "Causality"
  • From: Evig
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Simon G Best
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Simon G Best
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Simon G Best
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Simon G Best
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: bz
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Frame question
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: JMA
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: JMA
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: JMA
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: JMA
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: OT: Copyrightability of Ideas (Was: Re: The Aether... (where Physics meets Philosophy))
  • From: Simon G Best
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: OT: Copyrightability of Ideas (Was: Re: The Aether... (where Physics meets Philosophy))
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Copyrightability of Ideas (Was: Re: The Aether... (where Physics meets Philosophy))
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Simon G Best
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: shalayka
• Re: while only matter tells space-time how to curve, why are they fooling us?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Simon G Best
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Question about time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Simon G Best
• Re: while only matter tells space-time how to curve, why are they fooling us?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: shalayka
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: JMA
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: JMA
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: JMA
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about time dilation
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: shalayka
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Frame question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Frame question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Frame question
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Frame question
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: secrets of relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about time dilation
  • From: harry
• secrets of relativity
  • From: VinegarTasters@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Question about time dilation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Is It Worth Asking Real Questions Here?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Question about time dilation
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Question about time dilation
  • From: LuckyE
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: K_h
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Is It Worth Asking Real Questions Here?
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: bz
• Re: Frame question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Frame question
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: while only matter tells space-time how to curve, why are they fooling us?
  • From: xxein
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: JMA
• Re: Is It Worth Asking Real Questions Here?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure
  • From: JanPB
• Re: relativity is done entirely by intuition, no computer modeling and simulation needed, they say
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Is It Worth Asking Real Questions Here?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Is It Worth Asking Real Questions Here?
  • From: Simon G Best
• Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?
  • From: nagasane kotetsu
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Is It Worth Asking Real Questions Here?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Is It Worth Asking Real Questions Here?
  • From: Simon G Best
• Re: relativity is done entirely by intuition, no computer modeling and simulation needed, they say
  • From: nagasane kotetsu
• Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure
  • From: nagasane kotetsu
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• while only matter tells space-time how to curve, why are they fooling us?
  • From: nagasane kotetsu
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Cosmik de Bris
• Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure
  • From: JanPB
• Re: relativity is done entirely by intuition, no computer modeling and simulation needed, they say
  • From: JanPB
• Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Is It Worth Asking Real Questions Here?
  • From: nagasane kotetsu
• Re: einstein is right even when he says is wrong
  • From: nagasane kotetsu
• Re: Is It Worth Asking Real Questions Here?
  • From: shalayka
• Re: relativity is done entirely by intuition, no computer modeling and simulation needed, they say
  • From: nagasane kotetsu
• Re: Is It Worth Asking Real Questions Here?
  • From: nagasane kotetsu
• Is It Worth Asking Real Questions Here?
  • From: Simon G Best
• Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?
  • From: nagasane kotetsu
• Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure
  • From: nagasane kotetsu
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Kepler and his sequiplicate proportion
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure
  • From: Igor
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: Dono
• Re: relativity is done entirely by intuition, no computer modeling and simulation needed, they say
  • From: Dono
• Re: relativity is done entirely by intuition, no computer modeling and simulation needed, they say
  • From: Dono
• Re: relativity is done entirely by intuition, no computer modeling and simulation needed, they say
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity is done entirely by intuition, no computer modeling and simulation needed, they say
  • From: herwaal
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: colleesh
• Re: Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Evig
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: harry
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: colleesh
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: harry
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: I have an alternative answer to any question coserning SRT
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: harry
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: JMA
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: JMA
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: einstein is right even when he says is wrong
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Androcles
• Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Cosmik de Bris
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?
  • From: Androcles
• conversion from relativity
  • From: nagasane kotetsu
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: how does relativity relates to infinities, are there single infinity or set of infinities inside other infinities?
  • From: nagasane kotetsu
• Re: Kepler and his sequiplicate proportion
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• conversion from relativity
  • From: nagasane kotetsu
• Re: Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure
  • From: nagasane kotetsu
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• einstein is right even when he says is wrong
  • From: nagasane kotetsu
• Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• relativity is done entirely by intuition, no computer modeling and simulation needed, they say
  • From: mikado
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Cosmik de Bris
• Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure
  • From: mikado
• Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?
  • From: mikado
• Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?
  • From: mikado
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Kepler and his sequiplicate proportion
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Frame question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Calculazions within a inertial system.
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure
  • From: Igor
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: colleesh
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: dlzc
• "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Evig
• Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: colleesh
• Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Frame question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: how does relativity relates to infinities, are there single infinity or set of infinities inside other infinities?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: harry
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: harry
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: harry
• Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: colleesh
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: harry
• Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: harry
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: harry
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Dono
• Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Frame question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Frame question
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Dono
• Re: EINSHTEIN I SCHMACKA YOURA FACE
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Cosmik de Bris
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: shuba
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure
  • From: dlzc
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Calculazions within a inertial system.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Calculazions within a inertial system.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Calculazions within a inertial system.
  • From: OG
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure
  • From: mikado
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• how does relativity relates to infinities, are there single infinity or set of infinities inside other infinities?
  • From: mikado
• how does relativity relates to infinities, are there single infinity or set of infinities inside other infinities?
  • From: mikado
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: do we have space and time for real?
  • From: mikado
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: what makes relativity true, in order to hide from us the real science and a real truth we cant handle?
  • From: mikado
• Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?
  • From: mikado
• Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?
  • From: mikado
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?
  • From: mikado
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: A challenge to SR experts
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: dlzc
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Calculazions within a inertial system.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: harry
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: AltSci
• Re: do we have space and time for real?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: what makes relativity true, in order to hide from us the real science and a real truth we cant handle?
  • From: AltSci
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: GETTING RID OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: harry
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: do we have space and time for real?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: harry
• "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Evig
• Re: Calculazions within a inertial system.
  • From: Josef Matz
• A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: AltSci
• Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dono
• Re: I have an alternative answer to any question coserning SRT
  • From: AltSci
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: why selfestablished relativists hates partial differential equations?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: I have an alternative answer to any question coserning SRT
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Calculazions within a inertial system.
  • From: OG
• Re: Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Yet another Sagnac animation.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Dono
• Re: Calculazions within a inertial system.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Calculazions within a inertial system.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: I have an alternative answer to any question coserning SRT
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GETTING RID OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: LuckyE
• Re: Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: Traveler
• Re: I have an alternative answer to any question coserning SRT
  • From: AltSci
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: adam . trepczynski
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: is the truth of physics hidden in black holes?
  • From: Dono
• Re: I have an alternative answer to any question coserning SRT
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: I have an alternative answer to any question coserning SRT
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Robert Frost's Poetry and the Theory of General Relativity
  • From: Bill A
• Re: is the truth of physics hidden in black holes?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Calculazions within a inertial system.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Yet another Sagnac animation.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Calculazions within a inertial system.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Calculazions within a inertial system.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Calculazions within a inertial system.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Calculazions within a inertial system.
  • From: Androcles
• Calculazions within a inertial system.
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GETTING RID OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A challenge to SR experts
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: I have an alternative answer to any question coserning SRT
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: I have an alternative answer to any question coserning SRT
  • From: AltSci
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: I have an alternative answer to any question coserning SRT
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: I have an alternative answer to any question coserning SRT
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The unknown duality of truth.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Farce of Quantum Gravity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The unknown duality of truth.
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: I have an alternative answer to any question coserning SRT
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: AltSci
• Re: Yet another Sagnac animation.
  • From: Dono
• I have an alternative answer to any question coserning SRT
  • From: AltSci
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: how does light know that space in front of it is curved, in order to be attracted in a black hole?
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: GETTING RID OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: what or who imposed relativity in this universe
  • From: Dieter Heidorn
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GETTING RID OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GETTING RID OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Robert Frost's Poetry and the Theory of General Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Robert Frost's Poetry and the Theory of General Relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Robert Frost's Poetry and the Theory of General Relativity
  • From: Bill A
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The unknown duality of truth.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: how does light know that space in front of it is curved, in order to be attracted in a black hole?
  • From: Traveler
• The unknown duality of truth.
  • From: Caesar J. B. Squitti
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
  • From: Sue...
• Re: how does light know that space in front of it is curved, in order to be attracted in a black hole?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: what does an atom with its own energy level in order to emit light?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: A challenge to SR experts
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A challenge to SR experts
  • From: mluttgens
• "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Krow
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: MI5 Persecution: .net Magazine Applauds my Website (12349)
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: what does an atom with its own energy level in order to emit light?
  • From: bz
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: RP
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: LuckyE
• Re: what does an atom with its own energy level in order to emit light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: what or who imposed relativity in this universe
  • From: Dono
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: what does an atom with its own energy level in order to emit light?
  • From: xxein
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: K_h
• Re: how does an atom emit white depolarized incoherent light?
  • From: OG
• Re: A challenge to SR experts
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: what does an atom with its own energy level in order to emit light?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Cosmik de Bris
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: A challenge to SR experts
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A challenge to SR experts
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: A challenge to SR experts
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: how a photon can travel so long way?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: how a photon can travel so long way?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• how a photon can travel so long way?
  • From: izmirli
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: how does an atom emit white depolarized incoherent light?
  • From: OG
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: how does an atom emit white depolarized incoherent light?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: Neil Bates
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A challenge to SR experts
  • From: Dono
• Re: A challenge to SR experts
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: how does light know that space in front of it is curved, in order to be attracted in a black hole?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Farce of Quantum Gravity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A challenge to SR experts
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Farce of Quantum Gravity
  • From: Murphy
• Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A challenge to SR experts
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dono
• Re: A challenge to SR experts
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: what does an atom with its own energy level in order to emit light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A challenge to SR experts
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: what does an atom with its own energy level in order to emit light?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Alen
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Alen
• Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: harry
• Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: harry
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Question about gravity (curved space?)
  • From: LuckyE
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Dono
• Re: Yet another Sagnac animation.
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: harry
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: harry
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: harry
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A challenge to SR experts
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: what does an atom with its own energy level in order to emit light?
  • From: xxein
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Cosmik de Bris
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Cosmik de Bris
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Cosmik de Bris
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Cosmik de Bris
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
  • From: Sue...
• Re: how does a coherent standing wave light still propagate at a speed c++?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: how does a coherent standing wave light still propagate at a speed c++?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: bz
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
  • From: Dono
• Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
  • From: RP
• Re: Yet another Sagnac animation.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Yet another Sagnac animation.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Yet another Sagnac animation.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
  • From: Dono
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
  • From: RP
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: A challenge to SR experts
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: Dono
• Re: A challenge to SR experts
  • From: Dono
• Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
  • From: Dono
• Re: "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: RP
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Krow
• Yet another Sagnac animation.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: how does an atom emit white depolarized incoherent light?
  • From: RP
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: shalayka
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: harry
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
  • From: RP
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: bz
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: how does an atom emit white depolarized incoherent light?
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
  • From: mluttgens
• A challenge to SR experts
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: harry
• Re: how does light know that space in front of it is curved, in order to be attracted in a black hole?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: what does an atom with its own energy level in order to emit light?
  • From: RP
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: K_h
• johnreed - The Universe and the Mathematics Part 5
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• a johnreed take - Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe? Part 2
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: Sue...
• a johnreed take - Is Mass an Emergent quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe? Part 1
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Cosmik de Bris
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: bz
• Re: what does an atom with its own energy level in order to emit light?
  • From: xxein
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: how does an atom emit white depolarized incoherent light?
  • From: OG
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: John Park
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: bz
• Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: what does an atom with its own energy level in order to emit light?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: what does an atom with its own energy level in order to emit light?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: bz
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: how does light know that space in front of it is curved, in order to be attracted in a black hole?
  • From: Igor
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: how does a coherent standing wave light still propagate at a speed c++?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: how does light know that space in front of it is curved, in order to be attracted in a black hole?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
  • From: mluttgens
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Krow
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: bz
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: how does light know that space in front of it is curved, in order to be attracted in a black hole?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: harry
• special relativity
  • From: evabern
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: harry
• Re: how does light know that space in front of it is curved, in order to be attracted in a black hole?
  • From: bernardZ
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: bz
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: bz
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: how does light know that space in front of it is curved, in order to be attracted in a black hole?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: bz
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: how does light know that space in front of it is curved, in order to be attracted in a black hole?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: bz
• Re: light pulses 10000x smaller than wavelength of light itself !!?
  • From: mee
• Re: light pulses 10000x smaller than wavelength of light itself !!?
  • From: mee
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity in Curved Spacetime - Review
  • From: Dono
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Relativity in Curved Spacetime - Review
  • From: shuba
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity in Curved Spacetime - Review
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relativity in Curved Spacetime - Review
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity in Curved Spacetime - Review
  • From: shuba
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: bz
• Do muons prove SRT ?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Igor
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Dono
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: light pulses 10000x smaller than wavelength of light itself !!?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativity in Curved Spacetime - Review
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Relativity in Curved Spacetime - Review
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: bz
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: bz
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: bz
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: ABOUT THE LAWS OF THE MECHANICS
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: harry
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: harry
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: PD
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: K_h
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: bz
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: ABOUT THE LAWS OF THE MECHANICS
  • From: Dono
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Stamenin
• ABOUT THE LAWS OF THE MECHANICS
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Alen
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• sciencific proof of higher dimension and higher vibration
  • From: u84uog
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: bz
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: light pulses 10000x smaller than wavelength of light itself !!?
  • From: u84uog
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: harry
• Re: internal energy contributing to mass
  • From: bz
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: bz
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: light pulses 10000x smaller than wavelength of light itself !!?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: dlzc
• Re: internal energy contributing to mass
  • From: dlzc
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Igor
• Re: internal energy contributing to mass
  • From: sal
• Re: internal energy contributing to mass
  • From: sal
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: bz
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: bz
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: light pulses 10000x smaller than wavelength of light itself !!?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: bz
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Ahhhh....what ever happened to BILGE????
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Muon Question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: internal energy contributing to mass
  • From: Jean Paul
• Muon Question
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Ahhhh....what ever happened to BILGE????
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Ahhhh....what ever happened to BILGE????
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Ahhhh....what ever happened to BILGE????
  • From: vanep
• Re: newbie says hi
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Alen
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Alen
• Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
  • From: alanmc95210@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
  • From: alanmc95210@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
  • From: Dono
• Re: Ahhhh....what ever happened to BILGE????
  • From: Pmb
• Re: internal energy contributing to mass
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: internal energy contributing to mass
  • From: Jean Paul
• Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Relativistic rocket formulae
  • From: mluttgens
• "magnetospheric thermodynamics"
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Krow
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: bz
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: bz
• Re: Ahhhh....what ever happened to BILGE????
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Ahhhh....what ever happened to BILGE????
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Ahhhh....what ever happened to BILGE????
  • From: Pmb
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: internal energy contributing to mass
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Does propagation delay give rise to time dialation?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Does propagation delay give rise to time dialation?
  • From: RP
• Re: internal energy contributing to mass
  • From: Androcles
• Re: internal energy contributing to mass
  • From: sal
• Re: internal energy contributing to mass
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: what gravity we have at the center of earth?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Alen
• Re: what gravity we have at the center of earth?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: what gravity we have at the center of earth?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: newbie says hi
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Does propagation delay give rise to time dialation?
  • From: Dono
• Re: how much intuition and mathematics is needed in relativity?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: what gravity we have at the center of earth?
  • From: Dono
• Re: what gravity we have at the center of earth?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Does propagation delay give rise to time dialation?
  • From: RP
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Does propagation delay give rise to time dialation?
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: newbie says hi
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: what gravity we have at the center of earth?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: what property of relativity makes the universe binary?
  • From: RP
• Re: what property of relativity makes the universe binary?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Does propagation delay give rise to time dialation?
  • From: RP
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: what gravity we have at the center of earth?
  • From: Igor
• Re: internal energy contributing to mass
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Igor
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Does propagation delay give rise to time dialation?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Does propagation delay give rise to time dialation?
  • From: RP
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: what is the relationship between light and gravity?
  • From: RP
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Does propagation delay give rise to time dialation?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Does propagation delay give rise to time dialation?
  • From: RP
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: what is the relationship between light and gravity?
  • From: RP
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Krow
• At Last! MI-5 Persecution has discovered sci.physics.relativity
  • From: Sancho's Atomic Trousers
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Does propagation delay give rise to time dialation?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: newbie says hi
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: newbie says hi
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: newbie says hi
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: internal energy contributing to mass
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: internal energy contributing to mass
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Does propagation delay give rise to time dialation?
  • From: blackhead
• Re: internal energy contributing to mass
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: internal energy contributing to mass
  • From: Jean Paul
• Re: internal energy contributing to mass
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: internal energy contributing to mass
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: internal energy contributing to mass
  • From: Sue...
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: newbie says hi
  • From: PD
• internal energy contributing to mass
  • From: Jean Paul
• Re: newbie says hi
  • From: Pmb
• Re: newbie says hi
  • From: Pmb
• Re: newbie says hi
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Does propagation delay give rise to time dialation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: newbie says hi
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: what gravity we have at the center of earth?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: what gravity we have at the center of earth?
  • From: PD
• Re: Does propagation delay give rise to time dialation?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: what gravity we have at the center of earth?
  • From: PD
• Re: what gravity we have at the center of earth?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: what property of relativity makes the universe binary?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: newbie says hi
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: PD
• Re: what property of relativity makes the universe binary?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: newbie says hi
  • From: shuba
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• newbie says hi
  • From: Ross Tucker
• Re: Does propagation delay give rise to time dialation?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does propagation delay give rise to time dialation?
  • From: blackhead
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Does propagation delay give rise to time dialation?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Does propagation delay give rise to time dialation?
  • From: blackhead
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: gravity dipole proof, what permitivity and permeability in a wormhole?
  • From: Igor
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Dono
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Krow
• Re: how much intuition and mathematics is needed in relativity?
  • From: PD
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Pmb
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: bz
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Does propagation delay give rise to time dialation?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: bz
• Re: Does propagation delay give rise to time dialation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does propagation delay give rise to time dialation?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Traveler
• Does propagation delay give rise to time dialation?
  • From: blackhead
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: bz
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: how much intuition and mathematics is needed in relativity?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: PD
• Re: NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Androcles
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: bz
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: PD
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Krow
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: bz
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
  • From: Jean Paul
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Guidelines for effective USENET scientific discussion
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Guidelines for effective USENET scientific discussion
  • From: bz
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Krow
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: PD
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: where is the muon contracted in only one direction
  • From: Dono
• Re: where is the muon contracted in only one direction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ahhhh....what ever happened to BILGE????
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: where is the muon contracted in only one direction
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Michal Witkowski
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: PD
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: where is the muon contracted in only one direction
  • From: YBM
• Jean Piere Messager's Slander
  • From: Clew
• Re: Time to overhaul Newton's Theory of Gravitation? (Forwarded)
  • From: Igor
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Clew
• Re: relativity wrong as predicted by me many times - ufo
  • From: Igor
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity wrong as predicted by me many times - ufo
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: where is the muon contracted in only one direction
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity on their CV?
  • From: shalayka
• Re: relativity on their CV?
  • From: shalayka
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: bz
• Re: Time to overhaul Newton's Theory of Gravitation? (Forwarded)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time to overhaul Newton's Theory of Gravitation? (Forwarded)
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Time to overhaul Newton's Theory of Gravitation? (Forwarded)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: where is the muon contracted in only one direction
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: relativity on their CV?
  • From: Dono
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: where is the muon contracted in only one direction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: PD
• Re: relativity on their CV?
  • From: shalayka
• The Structure of Atoms as Interpreted by Model Mechanics
  • From: kenseto
• Re: where is the muon contracted in only one direction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's last words: "Ich habe meine Sache hier getan"
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein's last words: "Ich habe meine Sache hier getan"
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Einstein's last words: "Ich habe meine Sache hier getan"
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: Einstein's last words: "Ich habe meine Sache hier getan"
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Einstein's last words: "Ich habe meine Sache hier getan"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Einstein's last words: "Ich habe meine Sache hier getan"
  • From: bernardZ
• Re: Einstein's last words: "Ich habe meine Sache hier getan"
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: bz
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Dono
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Phil
• Re: Einstein's last words: "Ich habe meine Sache hier getan"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Einstein's last words: "Ich habe meine Sache hier getan"
  • From: greysky
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Evird
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Dono
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's last words: "Ich habe meine Sache hier getan"
  • From: cholesterol
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The theoretical problem of action at a distance
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Einstein's last words: "Ich habe meine Sache hier getan"
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: bz
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Phil
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: How fast gravity well re-adjusts ?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: How fast gravity well re-adjusts ?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: jackyhache
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How fast gravity well re-adjusts ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: bz
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Need Help -Conservation of Momentum question!!!
  • From: xandergiles1
• Re: relativity on their CV?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Ahhhh....what ever happened to BILGE????
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• relativity on their CV?
  • From: cable
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Dono
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Dono
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• The Aether and Being
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Ahhhh....what ever happened to BILGE????
  • From: cable
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: cable
• Re: relativity predicts deformations which are not real
  • From: cable
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ahhhh....what ever happened to BILGE????
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Dono
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Second time dimension
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Second time dimension
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Second time dimension
  • From: PD
• Re: relativity predicts deformations which are not real
  • From: PD
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: cable
• Re: gravity is acoustics of the universe
  • From: cable
• Re: relativity predicts deformations which are not real
  • From: cable
• Re: relativity predicts deformations which are not real
  • From: PD
• Re: On the Fundamental Forces as Measures of Particle Exchange over Differing Scales of Time
  • From: shalayka
• Re: gravity is acoustics of the universe
  • From: YBM
• Re: gravity is acoustics of the universe
  • From: cable
• gravity is acoustics of the universe
  • From: cable
• Re: relativity predicts deformations which are not real
  • From: cable
• Re: relativity predicts deformations which are not real
  • From: cable
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: On the Fundamental Forces as Measures of Particle Exchange over Differing Scales of Time
  • From: Dono
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Dono
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: relativity predicts deformations which are not real
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity predicts deformations which are not real
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity predicts deformations which are not real
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: relativity predicts deformations which are not real
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: relativity predicts deformations which are not real
  • From: PD
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Second time dimension
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: PD
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Androcles
• Re: enormous contradiction, do they know their tensors?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativity predicts deformations which are not real
  • From: Dono
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: enormous contradiction, do they know their tensors?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: enormous contradiction, do they know their tensors?
  • From: cable
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Second time dimension
  • From: Androcles
• Re: enormous contradiction, do they know their tensors?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: relativity predicts deformations which are not real
  • From: cable
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: bz
• enormous contradiction, do they know their tensors?
  • From: cable
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Second time dimension
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Second time dimension
  • From: Traveler
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time
  • From: OG
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• On the Fundamental Forces as Measures of Particle Exchange over Differing Scales of Time
  • From: shalayka
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: bz
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Dono
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: harry
• Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Real TWINS Paradox - the Simplest Version
  • From: Phil
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: bz
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Dono
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Dono
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: RP
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: RP
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: RP
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity predicts deformations which are not real
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• relativity predicts deformations which are not real
  • From: cable
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Phil
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Second time dimension
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Jeering Jeery the minor crank.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: bz
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time
  • From: PD
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: bz
• Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time
  • From: OG
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: dlzc
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: Igor
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: bz
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: bz
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How fast gravity well re-adjusts ?
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: McCullough's requested proof.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: bz
• Re: McCullough's requested proof.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bertie 2
  • From: harry
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: Dono
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: Dono
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time
  • From: Dono
• Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time
  • From: kenseto
• "Gravity"
  • From: Evird
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: bz
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: bz
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: bz
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• McCullough's requested proof.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: bz
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Second time dimension
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Second time dimension
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: and another theory which almost makes sense
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Jeering Jeery the minor crank.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Bertie 2
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity is perpetum mobiile
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: and another theory which almost makes sense
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: and another theory which almost makes sense
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: bz
• Re: Bertie 2
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: How fast gravity well re-adjusts ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Second time dimension
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Jeering Jeery the minor crank.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time
  • From: OG
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: PD
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Jeering Jeery the minor crank.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: How fast gravity well re-adjusts ?
  • From: bz
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: and another theory which almost makes sense
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• and another theory which almost makes sense
  • From: cable
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: impossible observation of length contraction
  • From: cable
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: cable
• time dilation is actually splitted time
  • From: cable
• Re: Jeering Jeery the minor crank.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: bz
• Re: what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: impossible observation of length contraction
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: impossible observation of length contraction
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: cable
• what length contraction in only one direction?
  • From: cable
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• impossible observation of length contraction
  • From: cable
• relativity is perpetum mobiile
  • From: cable
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: bz
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How fast gravity well re-adjusts ?
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: How fast gravity well re-adjusts ?
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: How fast gravity well re-adjusts ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Confusion in Expanding Confusion
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: sal
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Evird
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: PD
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: Ahhhh....what ever happened to BILGE????
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Jeering Jeery the minor crank.
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: bz
• Re: Ahhhh....what ever happened to BILGE????
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Sue...
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: bz
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: MORPHOGENESIS
  • From: xxein
• Re: Ahhhh....what ever happened to BILGE????
  • From: xxein
• Re: Jeering Jeery the minor crank.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Ahhhh....what ever happened to BILGE????
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: cable
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: cable
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: cable
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: cable
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: cable
• Epiphany IaSNe
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: John Kennaugh
• accelerated electrons in my CRT
  • From: cable
• Re: Ahhhh....what ever happened to BILGE????
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Ahhhh....what ever happened to BILGE????
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Jeering Jeery the minor crank.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Ahhhh....what ever happened to BILGE????
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: c + v = c, their tensors sucks
  • From: cable
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Confusion in Expanding Confusion
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Confusion in Expanding Confusion
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: bz
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Confusion in Expanding Confusion
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: sal
• Re: Bertie 2
  • From: dlzc
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Evird
• Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Dono
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Jeering Jeery the minor crank.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Jeering Jeery the minor crank.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Bertie 2
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: bz
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Dono
• Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Bertie 2
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Bertie 2
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Jeering Jeery the minor crank.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: RF antenna emitting photons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: RF antenna emitting photons
  • From: Gert Baars
• Re: RF antenna emitting photons
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Jeering Jeery the minor crank.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: RF antenna emitting photons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: c + v = c, their tensors sucks
  • From: bernardz
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Simple question
  • From: bz
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Cosmik de Bris
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time
  • From: OG
• Thruster's => time dilation, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: http://theorie-test.blogspot.com/
  • From: JR
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• In 1861, Maxwell derived Magnetic Curl using Coriolis Force
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: bz
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Eriw
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: kenseto
• ERICA,Igor,RP,PMB are WRONG about Coriolis & Magnetism similarity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• ERICA,Igor,RP,PMB are WRONG about Coriolis & Magnetism similarity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: A Problem with Relativity ?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A Problem with Relativity ?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: shuba
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: RF antenna emitting photons
  • From: Gert Baars
• Re: RF antenna emitting photons
  • From: Gert Baars
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: RF antenna emitting photons
  • From: Gert Baars
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time
  • From: OG
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: bz
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
  • From: Androcles
• RF antenna emitting photons
  • From: Gert Baars
• Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: RF antenna emitting photons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Dimensional Analysis
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A Problem with Relativity ?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Dimensional Analysis
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Dimensional Analysis
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Example why Coriolis & Magnetism are False Forces
  • From: sirius184
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time
  • From: kenseto
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: RF antenna emitting photons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Can we see the twin dying?
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Confusion in Expanding Confusion
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Oh Dono: Tom, Randy and PD are insulting you.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can we see the twin dying?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time
  • From: kenseto
• Your feedback is welcome
  • From: JR
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Second time dimension
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Eriw
• Re: Oh Dono: Tom, Randy and PD are insulting you.
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: proof for instantaneous information speed
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: proof for instantaneous information speed
  • From: cable
• Re: Can we see the twin dying?
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: c + v = c, their tensors sucks
  • From: Sancho's Atomic Trousers
• Re: Oh Dono: Tom, Randy and PD are insulting you.
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: A Problem with Relativity ?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A Problem with Relativity ?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: c + v = c, their tensors sucks
  • From: cable
• Re: c + v = c, their tensors sucks
  • From: cable
• Re: c + v = c, their tensors sucks
  • From: cable
• Re: A Problem with Relativity ?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A Problem with Relativity ?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Oh Dono: Tom, Randy and PD are insulting you.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A Problem with Relativity ?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: harry
• Re: Can we see the twin dying?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Confusion in Expanding Confusion
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Second time dimension
  • From: M Winther
• Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Gert Baars
• Re: RF antenna emitting photons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: RF antenna emitting photons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: c + v = c, their tensors sucks
  • From: Androcles
• Re: c + v = c, their tensors sucks
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: c + v = c, their tensors sucks
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Second time dimension
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: RF antenna emitting photons
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: c + v = c, their tensors sucks
  • From: nessunoic
• distribution functions+special relativity
  • From: evabern
• Re: c + v = c, their tensors sucks
  • From: cable
• Re: slow-down or speed-up paradox?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: RF antenna emitting photons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: proof for instantaneous information speed
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: bz
• Re: How fast gravity well re-adjusts ?
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: xxein
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Phil
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: xxein
• Re: How fast gravity well re-adjusts ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How fast gravity well re-adjusts ?
  • From: RP
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: xxein
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: bz
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: xxein
• Re: How fast gravity well re-adjusts ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: bz
• Re: RF antenna emitting photons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: c + v = c, their tensors sucks
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: c + v = c, their tensors sucks
  • From: cable
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: c + v = c, their tensors sucks
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Dimensional Analysis
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Mathematical Modelling
  • From: cable
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• c + v = c, their tensors sucks
  • From: cable
• c + v = c, their tensors sucks
  • From: cable
• Re: relativists put gravity in a flagrant contradiction
  • From: cable
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: bz
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Dimensional Analysis
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: slow-down or speed-up paradox?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• McCullough - Closet aetherialist.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: RF antenna emitting photons
  • From: Androcles
• Second time dimension
  • From: M Winther
• slow-down or speed-up paradox?
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Dimensional Analysis
  • From: shalayka
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Mathematical Modelling
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Confusion in Expanding Confusion
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: harry
• Re: How fast gravity well re-adjusts ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: How fast gravity well re-adjusts ?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: dlzc
• How fast gravity well re-adjusts ?
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: relativists put gravity in a flagrant contradiction
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Can we see the twin dying?
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: laboratory watch shows same time for both twins
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: laboratory watch shows same time for both twins
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: kinetic energy trtansformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: RF antenna emitting photons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: harry
• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Eriw
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: kinetic energy trtansformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: UK scientists working towards a redefinition of the kilogram
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: kinetic energy trtansformation
  • From: evabern
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• UK scientists working towards a redefinition of the kilogram
  • From: kevin . james9
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: harry
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Journal of Gravitational Physics Call for Papers
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: kinetic energy trtansformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Can we see the twin dying?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can we see the twin dying?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Journal of Gravitational Physics Call for Papers
  • From: Dono
• Journal of Gravitational Physics Call for Papers
  • From: jgp.editor@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: xxein
• Re: kinetic energy trtansformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: bz
• Re: Can we see the twin dying?
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Can we see the twin dying?
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Relativity is a Dutch discovery
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Magnetic Field During Motion
  • From: mL
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: bz
• Re: Simple question
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Simple question
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: A Problem with Relativity ?
  • From: PD
• Re: A Problem with Relativity ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Confusion in Expanding Confusion
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A Problem with Relativity ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Simple question
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: bz
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: kinetic energy trtansformation
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: bz
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A Problem with Relativity ?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple question
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Simple question
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: harry
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Simple question
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Simple question
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Einstein Contradicts Himself
  • From: Wings of Truth
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Simple question
  • From: PD
• Re: Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Magnetic Field During Motion
  • From: Simple Simon
• A Problem with Relativity ?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Chris O'Riordan
• Causality Paradox Question
  • From: Peter Moore
• Re: Simple question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Simple question
  • From: kenseto
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Eriw
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Alen
• Re: Journal of Gravitational Physics
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Alen
• Re: calculous in the curve space theorem 3
  • From: sal
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• kinetic energy trtansformation
  • From: evabern
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: IGOR is having a BIG HALLOWEEN PARTY
  • From: Sancho's Atomic Trousers
• Re: calculous in the curve space theorem 3
  • From: Joro
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Journal of Gravitational Physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Journal of Gravitational Physics
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Alen
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Alen
• Journal of Gravitational Physics
  • From: alexis
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Simple question
  • From: xxein
• Re: Is Time dilation Real???
  • From: Dono
• Re: Simple question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple question
  • From: xxein
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Sagnac Threads United
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Nanometre Twin
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Don Stockbauer