Re: Sagnac Threads United
- From: Jerry <Cephalobus_alienus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 03:13:49 -0700
On Nov 1, 3:53 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:11:20 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen"
How do your 'photons' know which frame of reference they
are supposed to roll in, when it is not in the source frame?
Didn't you say that according to the BaTh, the only reference
the photons have is the source? So how do they know that they
are supposed to roll in a frame of reference where the source
is moving?
The answer, to Paul's question, Henri, is that your photons roll
in the absolute frame of the stationary observer.
I have supplied a new animation to illustrate the fact that your
model implies an absolute frame. Your model violates the POR, and
predicts effects that should be visible in the MMX as well as
Sagnac. Scroll down to the bottom of the following page:
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/toothwheel/toothwheel.htm
Imagine my animation to represent a small section of a very large
rotating ring, so that it appears "straight".
Both rays move at c wrt the source. That is what the animation shows.
That is what my animation shows as well. At the end of my
animation, no matter what the source speed, both "photons" have
moved 225 pixels away from the source (black dot), regardless
whether one is measuring in the source frame or the stationary
frame. (lightspeed = 20 pixels/sec)
They move at c+v and c-v in the nonrotating frame of the ring.
that is what the animation shows.
That is what my animation shows as well. If you set the source
speed to 0.4 times the speed of light, then, measuring in the
stationary frame, the left photon will move 315 pixels, and the
right photon will move 135 pixels from the emission point. The
ratio 315/135 = 2.3333 = (1+0.4)/(1-0.4), which exactly matches
the ratio required by emission theory.
Both photons roll the precise number of revolutions required by
your model. The photon circles have a diameter of 26 pixels. If
you set the source speed to 0.4 times the speed of light, the
left photon rolls 3.86 revolutions, and the right photon rolls
1.65 revolutions regardless of whether one is measuring in the
source frame or the stationary frame.
What could be more simple?
Exactly. What could be more simple? Your model implies an
absolute frame, and implies an ability to detect one's motion
in this absolute frame. In other words, your model is garbage.
Jerry
Henri Wilson's Lies
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/diploma.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/deception.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/rt_aurigae.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/history.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/snips.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/accuses.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/oh_dear.htm
.
- References:
- Re: Sagnac Threads United
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Sagnac Threads United
- Prev by Date: Re: Second time dimension
- Next by Date: Re: Confusion in Expanding Confusion
- Previous by thread: Re: Sagnac Threads United
- Next by thread: Re: Sagnac Threads United
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
