Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
- From: "Juan R." <juanrgonzaleza@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 05:14:38 -0700
On Oct 29, 12:19 am, "Pmb" <some...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
By the way. The lack of my further participation in this thread, at least
with Juan R., is because he seems to want to start with personal attacks.
I'm not 100% sure of that but I have zero tolerance for such discussions. I
will of course respond to others. Juan can always e-mail me because I never
refuse to respond to a serious question.
This is unfair.
You opened this thread insulting others as "crackpots" and "very
ignorants".
I acknowledged you the two AJP articles. But I cannot acknowledge your
completely false postings about Poincaré and Einstein.
In this case you kept denying me
the references I asked for from historical physics literature, physics
journals, etc.
This is also unfair.
I provided links to Physics today and link to priority dispute article
in previous messages. I repeat both now:
http://www.aip.org/pt/vol-54/iss-12/p49.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativity_priority_dispute
If you had used a minute (or two) to follow the priority dispute
article, you would discover it lists near 70 references on the history
of relativity, including very recent articles and specialized books.
Therefore, i have provided you 70 references.
I have explained to you why Einstein has been accused from
plagiarizing (part of) Poincaré research on relativity.
Some recent resources of the above listed 70 also explain in detail
how Einstein copied/plagiarized Hilbert during the development of GR
decades after.
Pete
.
- Prev by Date: Re: proof for instantaneous information speed
- Next by Date: Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
- Previous by thread: Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
- Next by thread: Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
