Re: proof for instantaneous information speed

On Nov 3, 5:59 am, cable <h68...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 3, 4:54 am, "William Hayes" <revwilli...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

a> vacuum is a wrong reference elite sciencists in big
a> cars gave to light, c or whatever travels faster than
a> anything

Vacuum is not the reference, but the medium for photons to travel between
atoms.

huh!?

between atom what?

and if in it thay travel at that speed, and
not possibly faster, than vacuum is indeed
a reference to all speeds

i suspect you don know your tensors neither



a> becus by using their own weppans, vacuum is not
a> empty, if she were empty, then permitivity and permeability
a> were zeros, consequently instantaneous speeds
a> higher then light is a real fact not bull***

If you use light to see with, you will not see anything faster than light.
Light will be precieved as the ultmate speed barrier.
If you use sound to see with, you will not see anything faster than sound.
Sound would be the precieved ultimate speed barrier.
Hertzian physics will need to see something beyond light to see faster than
light.

Every time I think about tensors I get tensor and tensor.

.

Quantcast