Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
- From: bz <bz+spr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 01:34:10 +0000 (UTC)
John Kennaugh <JKNG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:yQRes6H
$iGLHFwZo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
No, he didn't but for a few hundred bux you can.
Why don't you? Go on make a name for yourself.
If I am right, I don't make a name for myself.
If you are right, you get a Nobel. Go for it.
Come up with a simple
experiment which proves source independence. No one else has managed it
- not a simple experiment that is.
Then formulate an experiment that will.
That is how science works, NOT by carping about things and insulting
people.
Good bye.
--
bz
please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.
bz+spr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
- References:
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
- From: bz
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
- From: bz
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
- Prev by Date: Re: Poincare and Einstein on Relativity
- Next by Date: Re: Tom Roberts agrees that clock second is not an interval of absolute time
- Previous by thread: Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
- Next by thread: Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading