Re: Sagnac Threads United
- From: Jerry <Cephalobus_alienus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 12:52:56 -0800
On Nov 4, 3:06 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 02:00:16 -0800, Jerry <Cephalobus_alie...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Nov 4, 4:43 am, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 20:16:02 -0700, Jerry <Cephalobus_alie...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Nov 3, 7:41 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
Your statement had no relevance to the issue at hand.
Hahahahaha!
You mean, 'it makes a mockery of your SR explanation'....
No, I meant that your comment was irrelevant.
Have another look'http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s2-07/2-07.htm
....shows the SR analysis in the non-rotating frame.
If you interchange 'end' and 'start' you have exactly the
BaTh analysis using the ROTATING frame.
Funny eh?
Since your current model does not match the requirements
of emission theory, your statement is irrelevant. We need
to analyze your -current model-.
But you DON'T, in general, know your rotation center.
That's a big statement.....almost certainly wrong...
OK. I've made minor internal changes to my animation.
My animation is NOW for a large rotating ring. Where is the
rotation center?
A ring gyro is NOT a large object. you can hold it in
your hand. you can see its centre.
Granted for a ring gyro, but I asked, where is the
rotation center of my ring?
Do you have sufficient information to answer that?
(Hint. The answer is no. The answer is generally no.)
...anyway you do in this case. It's the centre of the ring...
OK. I've made minor internal changes to my animation.
My animation is NOW for a large rotating ring. Where is the
rotation center?
A ring gyro is NOT a large object. you can hold it in
your hand. you can see its centre.
Well, then, where is the rotation center of my ring?
You know where the centre of the gyro is, Crank.....no
problem there....
OK. I've made minor internal changes to my animation.
My animation is NOW for a large rotating ring.
Where is the center of my large rotating ring?
A ring gyro is NOT a large object. you can hold it in your
hand. you can see its centre.
Where is the rotation center of my ring?
So you believe 'size' is absolute do you crank.... :)
OK. I've made minor internal changes to my animation.
My animation is NOW for a large rotating ring.
Where is the center of my rotating ring?
Give it up Crank. Size is not absolute.
You're lost and you've lost. Your brain-dead model
is indefensible.
Stop talking nonsense Crank. We are dealing with rotating.
My analysis works in both the rotating and non-rotating
frames.
Nope. Your analysis yields nonsense, and predicts that
forward light is emitted with a different frequency than
backward light, allowing determination of one's motion
in absolute space.
well then, if MY answer is nonsense so is that of SR....
Nope. Your model is nonsense, period.
That's why it produces the right answer.
Substitute "WRONG" for "RIGHT". Your model predicts
that it should be possible to determine absolute velocity
with respect to a fixed, absolute frame.
OK. I've made minor internal changes to my animation.
My animation is NOW for a large rotating ring.
Are you showing the detector?
The beam splitter counts as source and detector.
crap....
Give up?
I've made minor internal changes to my animation.
My animation is NOW for a large rotating ring.
Now answer the question.
I'm way ahead of you....
Nope.
Your animation is nothing like mine.
Every relevant feature of your model is matched by
my animation. Every measurement corresponds within
+/- 0.5 pixels to the requirements of your theory.
I just make the nonsensical features of your theory
easier to see.
Besides, if v is not <<<c second order terms that are
normally ignored become first order ones.
There are no significant second order terms to worry
about here, since we are looking only at local effects.
If you want to see the BaTh analyis using the rotating
frame see:
http://www.'end'for 'start'.
Nonsense link.
Do you honestly think snipping my abbreviated list of
your lies makes any difference? Everybody knows that
you are a pathological liar, except for you.
Jerry
Henri Wilson's Lies
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/diploma.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/deception.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/rt_aurigae.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/history.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/snips.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/accuses.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus_alienus/henri/oh_dear.htm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sagnac Threads United
- From: Androcles
- Re: Sagnac Threads United
- References:
- Re: Sagnac Threads United
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Sagnac Threads United
- From: Jerry
- Re: Sagnac Threads United
- From: Jerry
- Re: Sagnac Threads United
- From: Jerry
- Re: Sagnac Threads United
- From: Jerry
- Re: Sagnac Threads United
- Prev by Date: Re: Quantum Entanglement & Relativistic Motion?
- Next by Date: Re: Sagnac Threads United
- Previous by thread: Re: Sagnac Threads United
- Next by thread: Re: Sagnac Threads United
- Index(es):