Re: The Nanometre Twin
- From: Peri of Pera <riedt1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:10:22 -0800
Androcles said:
c+v is essential to the derivation of the cuckoo malformations, the
part where Einstein screws up is:
'we establish by definition that the "time" required by
light to travel from A to B equals the "time" it requires
to travel from B to A'
If distance A to B is equal to distance B to A and the speed of light
is
constant is it not logical that the two paths will be traversed in
equal "time"?
Peter Riedt
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Nanometre Twin
- From: Androcles
- Re: The Nanometre Twin
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin
- References:
- Re: The Nanometre Twin
- From: Sue...
- Re: The Nanometre Twin
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Nanometre Twin
- From: Androcles
- Re: The Nanometre Twin
- Prev by Date: Re: A New Solution to the Twins Paradox, and Others
- Next by Date: Re: The Nanometre Twin
- Previous by thread: Re: The Nanometre Twin
- Next by thread: Re: The Nanometre Twin
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|