Re: Sagnac Threads United
- From: "Androcles" <Engineer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:17:45 GMT
"Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote
"There is no doppler shift in BaTh." -- Wilson
news:05rvg3lp9nld0h4a8rnijr2uo870jcd0en@xxxxxxx
"Light doesn't have a 'frequency'. It has a wavelength." --Wilson.
news:1193906355.448067.162590@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"SPINNING OBJECTS HAVE A FREQUENCY, NOT A BLOODY WAVELENGTH." -- Wilson
news:pllli3puamdqd70qnenjoonfsbjtv1ibmj@xxxxxxx
"Light doesn't have a particuar 'frequency' in the normal sense.
Frequency is the inferred rate at whichABSOLUTE wavecrests leave the
source" -- Wilson.
news:3ghfh3h30n795o2vs1sulouge37ve0n17i@xxxxxxx
"THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT IN GENERAL, THE 'WAVELENGTH' OF AN OSCILLATION IS
THE
SAME IN ALL FRAMES." -- Wilson
news:920ni31ul6rb833qrltro49t3pnv2g5qk5@xxxxxxx
"Anyway, this now fits in perfectly with my 'intrinsic oscillation
frequency' idea.
Thankyou Jerry for helping me develop my theory...." -- Wilson,
October 26, 2007 1:03 PM
news:iml3i3dh0vmisp6ln34ron41uoljmonvni@xxxxxxx
"That's the kind of argument I'd expect from a desperate
person....completely out of ideas... ahahahaha!" -- Wilson.
"For one ray, ct = 2piR+vt , for the other ct = 2piR-vt. This gives t =
2piR/(c+v) and 2piR/(c-v)" -- Wilson.
news:q21vi3lmjhp5s9pkc554egjp1taus1drbt@xxxxxxxxxx
"That's for the nonrotating frame, dopey." -- Wilson.
news:cp7vi35bvqvta6o1vcvi4m1v6q8t4ro1la@xxxxxxxx
"There is NOT the same number of wavelengths between the STARTPOINT and the
detector" -- Wilson
news:8no1j39qhu9tk2nqglqkgt00u07se4i63q@xxxxxxx
You don't use emission theory and don't know what it is, your
crackpot theory is BaTh; you've been whining that for 6 years, you
invented it when I was in hospital in Florida with a shattered ankle
and I've been in Britain 4.5 years while you've gotten gradually more
senile. In all that time you've only learned to write "Dr" in front of
your name which nobody believes.
You blew it with denying Doppler and your tick fairies, senile old fart.
.
- References:
- Re: Sagnac Threads United
- From: Jerry
- Re: Sagnac Threads United
- From: Jerry
- Re: Sagnac Threads United
- From: Jerry
- Re: Sagnac Threads United
- From: Jerry
- Re: Sagnac Threads United
- From: Jerry
- Re: Sagnac Threads United
- Prev by Date: Re: The Nanometre Twin
- Next by Date: Re: The Nanometre Twin
- Previous by thread: Re: Sagnac Threads United
- Next by thread: Re: Sagnac Threads United
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|