Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- From: Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 13:21:51 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 17, 1:48 am, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:
On Nov 16, 2:19 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On page 180, equation 47 shows exactly what the Ricci tensor is
reduced to with the determinant of g being -1.
LOL, what happens in Eq.(44) to the S_uv if we
permit "g" to be positive and a function of
velocity,
In equations (44),
** G_uv = Ricci tensor, complete
** R_uv = Ricci tensor, if determinant of g = -1
** S_uv = 0, if determinant of g = -1
Levi-Civita was truly an amazing mathematician to be able to write the
Ricci tensor into that form.
such as g = +(1-v^2) ?
The determinant of g must be negative. If you insist on the nonsense
in your imagination, you are on your own.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- References:
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- Prev by Date: Re: newbie says hi
- Next by Date: Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- Previous by thread: Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- Next by thread: Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|