Re: GR1916 question about g=1?

On Nov 17, 3:46 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr.pi.nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 11:28:29 -0800 (PST), "Ken S. Tucker"



<dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 17, 3:51 am, Eric Gisse <jowr.pi.nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 01:48:31 -0800 (PST), "Ken S. Tucker"

<dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 16, 2:19 pm, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
On page 180, equation 47 shows exactly what the Ricci tensor is
reduced to with the determinant of g being -1.

LOL, what happens in Eq.(44) to the S_uv if we
permit "g" to be positive and a function of
velocity, such as g = +(1-v^2) ?

What "happens" is that the person who made such a statement is
revealed to be a collosal idiot who doesn't understand that the metric
tensor is a symmetric object containing the ten direction cosines of
that particular coordinate basis which cannot be a function of
velocity.

Sorry "E" for Eric, it's PEER reviewed,
and found free of error by REAL experts.
I do suggest you keep up your "bake sale"
vocation, you're headed for burger flippin'
Ken

You were the one suggesting a metric that was a function of velocity.
Not Einstein, not anyone else.

Stop pretending you understand anything.

LOL, see pg. 184 of Dover's PoR Eq.8.
"as always with static problems..."

g_14 = g_24 = g_34 = 0 . . (8)

Now perhaps "E" student as in Eric will
explain to our fine group why AE spec'd
"static", to preface that Eq.(8)?

We're all waiting for our resident "E"
student to enlighten us with his great
degrees.........LOL, never will she do.

Regards
Ken S. Tucker
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
    ... On Nov 17, 3:51 am, Eric Gisse ... reduced to with the determinant of g being -1. ... permit "g" to be positive and a function of ... velocity. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: It would be nice if Google would..
    ... I repeat, because it bears repeating: just because you spent most of ... "Eric Gisse" is ignorant of the fact that ... Minkowski introduced frame velocity ... tan(a+b) = tan a ± ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Lorentz transformations when the velocity is not along the x-axis.
    ... Eric Gisse wrote: ... v is the magnitude of the velocity. ... I am challenging Dirk to provide equations to do the same, ... see your response to any of my homework problems. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The demise of SR.
    ... the failure of one student to learn a subject ... between a velocity (i.e. the rate of change of ... change of coordinates in any frame). ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Indian teacher finds inconsistencies in E=mc2
    ... Eric Gisse wrote: ... some respect for our 22 years old student ... ERIC sHISE ... he got a licence from his psychatrist to be the manager of this ng!!! ...
    (sci.physics)