Re: How many dimensions are there?
- From: "K_h" <KHolmes@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:24:42 -0800
"Gerald L. O'Barr" <globarr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fd564c6b-0cf3-4099-a324-55c4e2021745@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: How many dimensions are there?
the math) is perfectly justifiable. Yes, the placing
of the math into a 4-D type of format has many good
features to it. But this simple act of re-organizing
the math can not possibly have anything at all to do
with the basic physical theory.
Now if you say that there is a real 4-D, then I
also expect you to show the exact same science. I do
not just want to hear you say that there is 4-D. I
want you to science it. Tell me the test that cannot
be done unless there is 4-D, and then let us do this
test, and let the test results show us that there is
4-D. Such a test does not exist.
And it will never exist, since there is no 4-D
that exists to even allow such an act to be
considered. Unless you become more scientific, you
are going to be made to be a fool. We are all fools
to even have to discuss such a silly thing as 4-D,
when we really all know that such a thing is
physically impossible.
No, it's 4d. No thickness in t means no t. Yet t is and so it has
thickness. But thickness in t means 4d. So, 4d.
ibi
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How many dimensions are there?
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: How many dimensions are there?
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: How many dimensions are there?
- References:
- Re: How many dimensions are there?
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: How many dimensions are there?
- From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: How many dimensions are there?
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: How many dimensions are there?
- From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: How many dimensions are there?
- Prev by Date: Re: Muon Question
- Next by Date: Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- Previous by thread: Re: How many dimensions are there?
- Next by thread: Re: How many dimensions are there?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|