Re: The real twin paradox.

On Nov 21, 11:40 am, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
"colp" <c...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:06b84031-18aa-4644-bfb7-43f49f46ae6a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This thought experiment is like the classic twin paradox, but in this
expirement both twins leave earth and travel symmetric return trips in
opposite directions.

Since the paths taken by the twins in this experiment are symmetric,
they must be the same age when they meet on their return to earth.

In this experiment the twins maintain constant observation of each
other's clocks, from when they depart until they return and find that
their clocks tell the same time.

Special relativity says that each twin must observe that the other's
clock is running slow, and at no time does special relativity allow
for an observation which shows that the other clock is running fast.

No, special relativity says much more precise than that
"moving clocks" are running slow.

It says something about intertial observers who measure
times between ticks on remote, moving clocks.

When your two clocks fly apart, each clock will measure
this time to be longer and conclude that the other clock
is "running slower".
While clock A is coasting, according to clock A, each
tick on clock A is simultaneous with some tick on clock B
with a smaller time value.
While clock B is coasting, according to clock B, each
tick on clock B is simultaneous with some tick on clock A
with a smaller time value.

After clock A has made its turnaround, it has shifted to
another inertial frame, in which according to clock A, each
tick on clock A is simultaneous with some tick on clock B
with a larger time value.
After clock B has made its turnaround, it has shifted to
another inertial frame, in which according to clock B, each
tick on clock B is simultaneous with some tick on clock A
with a larger time value.



The paradox is that special relativity says that a twin will never see
the other twin's clock catch up, but the clocks must show the same
time at the end of the experiment because of symmetry.

When they finally meet, for both clocks, this larger time reading of
the simultaneous events on the other clock is compensated by the
"more slowly running time" on that clock such that they read the
same time when they are reunited.

Dirk Vdm
[copy and follow-up to sci.physics.relativity]

Blah Balh Blah

You are not even able to solve an elementary problem
about a relativistic rocket!

Marcel Luttgens

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
    ... Both twins are the same revolutions of Earth with reference ... The same fools also never learned how a clock works ... twin, but if the Traveling Clock is Malfunctioning, then ... has a hand that goes tick tick tick... ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: What is Proper Time?
    ... really does tick slower in your frame of reference .. ... So is the clock in orbit around Juptier? ... When you talk about rotations of the earth, do you mean its rotation around the sun, or the spin of the earth on its own axis. ... The clock will send N signals and the observer would receive N signals. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] Experimental enhanced NTP error accounting patch
    ... The ntp code provides the time update per tick: ... That's all the clock code needs from the ntp code (the details of its ... To keep timeofday the same after changing the multiplier we also have to ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
    ... Both twins are the same revolutions of Earth with reference ... The same fools also never learned how a clock works ... twin, but if the Traveling Clock is Malfunctioning, then ... has a hand that goes tick tick tick... ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Time dilation
    ... an Earth clock as it leaves Earth, travels to a point a fixed distance, ... With telemetry each tick could be uniquely identified. ... The Earth observer measures the time for the 2 way trip as ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)