Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: colp <colp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:27:27 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 22, 5:48 am, "Josef Matz" <josefm...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
Hello Dirk
If you could mathematically demonstrate that the time delays of the
symmetric clock A as viewed by B can be
compensated somehow you have solved the paradox !
Would you tell us idiots how this runs in SR ?
A solution could include an argument from general relativity as well,
since the twins must spend time in non-inertial frames in order to
accelearate/decelerate and turn around. I don't think it would solve
the paradox though because the dilation effects can be increased
arbitrarily by extending the amount of time spent in inertial frames.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: harry
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: Cosmik de Bris
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- References:
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: Josef Matz
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- Prev by Date: Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- Next by Date: Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- Previous by thread: Re: The real twin paradox.
- Next by thread: Re: The real twin paradox.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|