Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
- From: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:09:03 -0900
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:02:25 -0800 (PST), mluttgens@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Nov 21, 10:51 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr.pi.nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:10:09 -0800 (PST), mluttg...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Nov 21, 2:18 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr.pi.nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 02:54:30 -0800 (PST), mluttg...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
[...]
No SR expert can solve this elementary problem?
Here is a clue: the residual valocity = 0.8894 c
Marcel Luttgens
Free clue, Marcel: You aren't asking anything worth answering.
Escapist!, like your SR buddies, who seem to be unable to solve the
problem.
Marcel Luttgens
It is a simple problem with constant acceleration. Nothing interesting
here, except your inability to solve it
Then give your solution, but I presume that you can't!
Marcel Luttgens
Free clue, Marcel: Nobody cares.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
- From: mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
- References:
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
- From: alanmc95210@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
- From: mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
- From: mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
- From: mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
- From: mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
- Prev by Date: Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- Next by Date: Re: The real twin paradox.
- Previous by thread: Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
- Next by thread: Re: Relativistic rocket formulae
- Index(es):