Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: Dono <sa_ge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:15:52 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 22, 7:23 am, "kenseto" <kens...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I didn't say that at all. I said that a moving clock running slow because
its clock second contains a larger amount of absolute time. This corresponds
to the SR/GR prediction that a moving clock runs slow.
Ken Seto
http://www.movv.com/prvupload/uploads/super_retard_stfu.jpg
.
- References:
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: Josef Matz
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: Sue...
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: kenseto
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- Prev by Date: Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
- Next by Date: Re: A challenge to SR experts
- Previous by thread: Re: The real twin paradox.
- Next by thread: Re: The real twin paradox.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
