Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- From: Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:57:23 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 22, 6:58 am, John C. Polasek wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Koobee Wublee wrote:
The above equation is the same as
ds^2 = g_ij dq^i dq^j = [g] * [dq^2]
The last term is wrong. Learn the matrix rules of conformability.
In the first place, if [g] is 4x4 and [dq2] is 4x1 then ds2 = 4x1, a
vector, but you need a scalar.
[dq^2] is a 4-by-4 matrix with (dq^i dq^j) being the elements. How in
the world can you possibly construe [dq^2] as a 4-by-1 matrix?
[Learning deficient remarks snipped]
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- References:
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- From: JanPB
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- From: JanPB
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- From: JanPB
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- From: John C . Polasek
- Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- Prev by Date: Re: Do muons prove SRT ?
- Next by Date: Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- Previous by thread: Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- Next by thread: Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- Index(es):