Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: dlzc <dlzc1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:42:27 -0800 (PST)
Dear Dirk Van de moortel:
On Nov 26, 9:58 am, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
"N:dlzcD:aol T:com (dlzc)" <dl...@xxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:Brp2j.20320$4k.3923@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx....
He is about the kindest person I know, and he has the
most fun with those who set out to decieve. If you
honestly believe he has made an error, you'd better
check your facts at least twice. I assure you, he
has not. It would spoil his fun.
David, are you sure I deserve that compliment?
Thanks!
Did not mean to make you blush. The fact that you question yourself
is, to me, proof that what I said is correct. Cranks never do
question themselves.
And keep in mind that "kind" does not mean you pull any punches.
Telling someone what it really is, can be the kindest thing you can do
for them.
And fun is what I'm having indeed :-)
Excellent. Hope the upcoming holidays are good to you.
David A. Smith
.
- References:
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- Prev by Date: Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
- Next by Date: Re: Sagnac Threads United
- Previous by thread: Re: The real twin paradox.
- Next by thread: Re: The real twin paradox.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|