Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
- From: Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:36:22 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 26, 3:06 am, John Kennaugh < wrote:
The reason I am aiming this post at Tom is that I know that he is one of
the few people on this NG who has actually studied Lorentz Ether Theory
from the mathematical PoV. [...]
Both LET and SR share the same mathematics --- the Lorentz transform.
They are, in each, merely different interpretations to the same
mathematics. It is ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE to prove which
interpretation is wrong. Since the Lorentz transform manifests the
nonsense of the twin's paradox as well as relative simultaneity, both
conjectures of LET and SR are manure of the same pile in height and
odor.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
- From: harry
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
- References:
- A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
- From: John Kennaugh
- A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
- Prev by Date: Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
- Next by Date: Re: maybe einstein did tensors, but he did not partial differential equations for sure
- Previous by thread: Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
- Next by thread: Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
