Orbital precession w/o GR

I developed an explanation of orbital precession that does not require
GR. It only uses 2 well accepted physical formulas and some math. It
can be viewed at:
http://toe.sytes.net:65333/planetary%20precession.pdf

I await your personal attacks and name calling.

Thank you very much.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: What should a theory give us?
    ... Correct math ... LET has one frame of reference where clocks slow and matter shrinks and all ... It provides no explanation for the explanation. ... the correct physics that goes with the correct math. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
    ... >>> positron can be counted as support for SR. ... >SR but also includes more physics than is in SR, ... of the math are independent of uniform motions. ... Surely you know that to have an explanation is better ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
    ... It only uses 2 well accepted physical formulas and some math. ... resort to SR to conduct calculations, ... these anecdotals in an abbreviated ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
    ... It only uses 2 well accepted physical formulas and some math. ... I've studied your paper and IMO it has ... these anecdotals in an abbreviated ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
    ... with no other support for it than the explanation that em ... I do not argue with the math; I just understand that math constructs ... >>> note that you presume that photons are things that really exist, ... > describes is a representation that is characterized by certain ...
    (sci.physics)