Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA

On Nov 27, 7:31 pm, "Pmb" <some...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"colleesh" <colle...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:13c8cc49-870e-4a7f-aa97-20dce4579da1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized

>is based upon the fact, that Einstein's Sep. 1905 derivation of L=mc2

(light energy mass equivalence), is true under SPECIAL CONDITIONS ,
not in general.

Why do you believe that is the case. Also, what is it that you claim that
the special conditions are and why do you think they don't hold in general?

Einstein's this derivation involve many parameters
e.g. number of light waves , magnitude of energy of light waves,
angles at which waves are emitted and velocity v. These parameters
have numerous values, but Einstein has taken just handpicked values of
parameters. The results are different if other feasible values of
parameters are considered.

Einstein's Sep 1905 paper is available at

www.ajayonline.us

From L =mc2 Einstein's speculated (DID NOT DERIVE as in Sep 1905
paper) E=mc2 .

And one what basis do you claim that this is true. I've read his 1905
derivation several times and at no instance have I ever seen Einstein
speculat the relation. It is a derived relationship. It is also examined in

"Einstein's first derivation of mass-energy equivalence, John Stachel and
Roberto Torretti, Am. J. Phys. 50, 760 (1982).

and arrives at the same conclusion I and most physicists do.

Thus generalized equation ?E = Ac2?m , has been
suggested , here A is coefficient of proportionality.

That expression is undeadable. However you are right in saying that the
expression only holds under special conditions. Those conditions are that
the relation holds only for isolated bodies and not bodies under stress.

The basis of discussion is PEER REVIEW articles published in
International Journals and presented in International Conference in
USA and ENGLAND.

Please be more precise. What articles are you refering to? Please post the
name of the article, the article's author and the journal it published in
for each article.

[snip]

Pete

----------------------------------------------
"Einstein's first derivation of mass-energy equivalence, John Stachel
and
Roberto Torretti, Am. J. Phys. 50, 760 (1982).

This paper does not discuss effects
(i) Number of light waves
(ii) Magnitude of energy of light waves
(iii) All possible angles at which waves are emitted
(vi) Velocity v , or application of Binomial theorem.

All these factors are taken in account , in the papers
download free from

www.ajayonline.us

These are also discused at length in recetly published book

EINSTEIN'S E=MC2 GENERALIZED

http://www.amazon.com/Einsteins-Mc2-Generalized-Ajay-Sharma/dp/1934360228/ref=sr_1_1/103-6624673-6380637?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190733223&sr=1-1





.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast