Re: Orbital precession w/o GR

On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:12:50 -0800 (PST), dr_strangelove
<daveb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Nov 28, 2:31 am, Eric Gisse <jowr.pi.nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:58:37 -0800 (PST), dr_strangelove

<da...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I developed an explanation of orbital precession that does not require
GR. It only uses 2 well accepted physical formulas and some math. It
can be viewed at:
http://toe.sytes.net:65333/planetary%20precession.pdf

I await your personal attacks and name calling.

Thank you very much.

You are obviously wrong without even getting into the idiocies of
using SR and Newton together to explain something gravitational in
nature.

By assuming a 1/r potential you have already determined the physics.
There is no precession of perihelia in a 1/r attractive potential. You
are doubly dead on arrival.

Oh, you mean squaring 1/r doesn't give 1/r^2?

I am gonna sue my second grade math teacher. I hope I can get you to
testify Eric.

Do you know how to get force from a potential?

If so, why are you saying something so stupid?

If not, why are you even talking when you don't have the faintest clue
of what you are trying to discuss?
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
    ... science fiction but poor physics. ... That new math will evolve the continuum ... I would to mention Sue, ... should get a bit of input on covariant/contravariant. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated
    ... go right to the roots of the calculus used for GR. ... That new math will evolve the continuum ... I would to mention Sue, ... should get a bit of input on covariant/contravariant. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
    ... It only uses 2 well accepted physical formulas and some math. ... resort to SR to conduct calculations, ... these anecdotals in an abbreviated ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Coulomb derived gravity
    ... Sue... ... > Ken S. Tucker: ... > If the math is going to take those nice pocket ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
    ... It only uses 2 well accepted physical formulas and some math. ... I've studied your paper and IMO it has ... these anecdotals in an abbreviated ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)