Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
- From: "Martin Hogbin" <goatREMOVETHIS123@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:29:37 -0000
"John Kennaugh" <JKNG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u7RpmiGcodTHFwoJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Koobee Wublee wrote:
It is ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE to prove which
interpretation is wrong.
As SR now offers none it is ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE to show that they are
different theories. What physics has done it to change the rules such
that physical interpretation...
What do you mean by 'physical interpretation'?
--
Martin Hogbin
.
- References:
- A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
- From: John Kennaugh
- A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
- Prev by Date: Question about time dilation
- Next by Date: Re: Question about time dilation
- Previous by thread: Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
- Next by thread: Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
- Index(es):
