Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
- From: Dono <sa_ge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 08:23:33 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 30, 7:15 am, "JMA" <NOS...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Dono" <sa...@xxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu na mensagemnews:964e4451-8e96-40fc-8fb0-c452c4296c54@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Nov 30, 6:16 am, "JMA" <NOS...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<...>
Jose,Jose, still the:
http://eldoradoclub.net/images/wacko-lg_1_.gif
Come on Dono.
You've been around here claiming you know a lot
about relativity.
Why can't you answer these questions:
1 - When relativy is need ?
Because Newtonian mechanics failed to explain the 43 arcseconds /
century discrepancy wrt observation
2 - Why relativity is need ?
Because Jose Albuquerque is an antirelativistic idiot who can't
understand physics and can't write English
3 - What does relativity fix ?
Jose Albuquerque misconceptions abour physics, of course.
Regarding Mercury's perihelion advance.
The discrepancy between Newtonian predictions and actual observation,
dumbass.
http://eldoradoclub.net/images/wacko-lg_1_.gif
.
- References:
- Orbital precession w/o GR
- From: dr_strangelove
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
- From: JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
- From: Androcles
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
- From: JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
- From: bz
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
- From: JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
- From: JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
- From: JMA
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
- From: Dono
- Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
- From: JMA
- Orbital precession w/o GR
- Prev by Date: Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
- Next by Date: Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
- Previous by thread: Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
- Next by thread: Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
- Index(es):