sci.physics.relativity

• Date Index

---

• Ugh, Another Frame Drag Question?, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Ugh, Another Frame Drag Question?, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Ugh, Another Frame Drag Question?, Ken S. Tucker
• Bad at Math, golfmyball
  • Re: Bad at Math, Sue...
  • Re: Bad at Math, Martin Hogbin
  • Re: Bad at Math, Niblick
• "The Creation of a Universe and the Gravity Transformations", Mret
• The speed of light is neither constant nor variable, Albertito
  • Re: The speed of light is neither constant nor variable, Androcles
    • Re: The speed of light is neither constant nor variable, Albertito
      • Re: The speed of light is neither constant nor variable, Androcles
  • Re: The speed of light is neither constant nor variable, Kapowski
    • Re: The speed of light is neither constant nor variable, Albertito
  • Re: The speed of light is neither constant nor variable, dlzc
  • Re: The speed of light is neither constant nor variable, Tom Roberts
• Re: M'I-5 P ersecution Harassm ent th rough the Rad io, Don Stockbauer
• What are physicists trying to do?, Martin Hogbin
  • Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Randy Poe
    • Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Randy Poe
      • Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Androcles
      • Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Randy Poe
      • Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Martin Hogbin
    • Message not available
      • Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Bill Hobba
  • Message not available
    • Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Jeckyl
  • Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Bill Hobba
  • Message not available
    • Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Bill Hobba
  • Re: What are physicists trying to do?, xxein
    • Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Martin Hogbin
  • Message not available
    • Re: What are physicists trying to do?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: What are physicists trying to do?, Daily Nostrums
  • Re: What are physicists trying to do?, John Schutkeker
• Quiz, Simple Simon
  • Re: Quiz, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Quiz, Jeckyl
      • Re: Quiz, Dono
      • Re: Quiz, Jeckyl
      • Re: Quiz, George Hammond
      • Re: Quiz, Jeckyl
      • Re: Quiz, George Hammond
      • Re: Quiz, Jeckyl
      • Re: Quiz, George Hammond
      • Re: Quiz, Jeckyl
  • Re: Quiz, Martin Hogbin
    • Re: Quiz, Jeckyl
  • Re: Quiz, George Hammond
    • Re: Quiz, George Hammond
  • Re: Quiz, Dono
    • Re: Quiz, Dono
    • Re: Quiz, George Hammond
  • Re: Quiz, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Quiz, Dono
      • Re: Quiz, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Quiz, Dono
      • Re: Quiz, Jeckyl
    • Re: Quiz, Martin Hogbin
  • Re: Quiz, adam . trepczynski
    • Re: Quiz, Dono
      • Re: Quiz, adam . trepczynski
• Flat => Curved Spacetime, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Flat => Curved Spacetime, xxein
• Re: Dark energy: the decade ahead (12 screens, 7 sketches), Factotum
• johnreed Take 24 - What is Super Electromagnetic 'Gravitation'?, johnlawrencereedjr
• Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electromagnetic Universe?, johnlawrencereedjr
• "Retic Postings and SPAM", Tuo
  • Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM", JanPB
    • Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM", xray4abc
• INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON OPTICAL SUPERCOMPUTING, optical . supercomputing
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Tuo
  • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", bernardZ
    • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Att of Tom Roberts, Juan R.
• Tansverse mass, xray4abc
  • Re: Tansverse mass, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: Tansverse mass, xray4abc
      • Re: Tansverse mass, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Tansverse mass, fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Tansverse mass, xray4abc
  • Re: Tansverse mass, Pmb
    • Re: Tansverse mass, xray4abc
• Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
  • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Sue...
    • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, paparios@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, paparios@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Alen
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Alen
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Alen
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Alen
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Alen
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dono
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Sue...
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
  • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Koobee Wublee
    • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dono
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
  • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
    • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dono
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
    • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, PD
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, PD
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, PD
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Androcles
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Jeckyl
      • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, G
  • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation, Martin Hogbin
• after the logical refutation: what next?, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Dono
  • Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, dlzc
    • Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Androcles
      • Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Don Stockbauer
      • Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, dlzc
      • Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Androcles
      • Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, dlzc
      • Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Androcles
      • Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Jeckyl
  • Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Bill Hobba
  • Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Jeckyl
    • Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Bill Hobba
  • Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Androcles
      • Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Jeckyl
      • Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Jerry
      • Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Androcles
    • Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Jeckyl
    • Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Bill Hobba
    • Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: after the logical refutation: what next?, Bill Hobba
• SR & perpendicular motion, David
  • Re: SR & perpendicular motion, Eric Gisse
    • Re: SR & perpendicular motion, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: SR & perpendicular motion, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: SR & perpendicular motion, Paul Cardinale
      • Re: SR & perpendicular motion, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: SR & perpendicular motion, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: SR & perpendicular motion, David
• "A Snapshot of a Photon", Tuo
• SR & irreversible processes, David
  • Re: SR & irreversible processes, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: SR & irreversible processes, David
      • Re: SR & irreversible processes, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: SR & irreversible processes, dlzc
  • Re: SR & irreversible processes, Juan R.
    • Re: SR & irreversible processes, Dirk Van de moortel
• 5 reasons why Godels incompleteness theorem invalid, elsiemelsi
  • Re: 5 reasons why Godels incompleteness theorem invalid, Don Stockbauer
    • Re: 5 reasons why Godels incompleteness theorem invalid, dlzc
      • Re: 5 reasons why Godels incompleteness theorem invalid, xxein
  • Re: 5 reasons why Godels incompleteness theorem invalid, Bill Hobba
• Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?, Josef Matz
  • Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?, dlzc
    • Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?, Eric Gisse
• why they give no nobels anymore for all the new modern theories ?, fungus
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • why they give no nobels anymore for all the new modern theories ?, fungus
    • Re: why they give no nobels anymore for all the new modern theories ?, Jeckyl
      • Re: why they give no nobels anymore for all the new modern theories ?, fungus
• the logical refutation, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: the logical refutation, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: the logical refutation, shuba
    • Re: the logical refutation, Androcles
    • Re: the logical refutation, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: the logical refutation, Androcles
  • Re: the logical refutation, bernardZ
  • Re: the logical refutation, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: the logical refutation, Sue...
  • Re: the logical refutation, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: the logical refutation, Androcles
  • Re: the logical refutation, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: the logical refutation, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: the logical refutation, dlzc
    • Re: the logical refutation, shuba
    • Re: the logical refutation, Androcles
  • Re: the logical refutation, Tom Roberts
    • Re: the logical refutation, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: the logical refutation, bernardZ
  • Re: the logical refutation, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: the logical refutation, dlzc
    • Re: the logical refutation, Androcles
      • Re: the logical refutation, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: the logical refutation, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: the logical refutation, Paul Cardinale
    • Re: the logical refutation, Androcles
      • Re: the logical refutation, Paul Cardinale
      • Re: the logical refutation, Androcles
      • Re: the logical refutation, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: the logical refutation, Koobee Wublee
  • Re: the logical refutation, Dono
  • Re: the logical refutation, Daryl McCullough
• Twins travel effect, roberto neves
  • Re: Twins travel effect, Dono
    • Re: Twins travel effect, roberto neves
      • Re: Twins travel effect, Dono
  • Re: Twins travel effect, Sue...
    • Re: Twins travel effect, roberto neves
      • Re: Twins travel effect, Sue...
      • Re: Twins travel effect, Jeckyl
      • Re: Twins travel effect, Jeckyl
    • Re: Twins travel effect, Jeckyl
  • Re: Twins travel effect, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Twins travel effect, xxein
  • Re: Twins travel effect, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: Twins travel effect, Jeckyl
    • Re: Twins travel effect, Dirk Van de moortel
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy", Tuo
• "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", Tuo
  • Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", JanPB
• Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Tom Roberts
  • Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Juan R.
    • Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Dono
    • Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, shuba
      • Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Dono
      • Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, shuba
    • Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Juan R.
      • Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Dono
      • Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, shuba
      • Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Dono
      • Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Dono
  • Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, shuba
  • Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Martin Hogbin
    • Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, xxein
    • Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, xxein
  • Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Dono
    • Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Dono
• Should we admit anti-space if we admit anti-matter?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
  • Re: Should we admit anti-space if we admit anti-matter?, Eric Gisse
• Re: I am confused by relativity, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: I am confused by relativity, Pmb
    • Re: I am confused by relativity, Tom Roberts
      • Re: I am confused by relativity, maxwell
      • Re: I am confused by relativity, Tom Roberts
    • Re: I am confused by relativity, Dirk Van de moortel
• Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), rob
  • Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Androcles
    • Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Eric Gisse
    • Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Jeckyl
  • Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Eric Gisse
    • Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Rob
      • Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Dono
  • Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Dono
  • Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Dono
    • Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), rob
      • Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Eric Gisse
      • Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Rob
      • Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Dono
      • Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Rob
      • Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet), Dono
• Re: Josephmas, Jong Kim
  • Re: Josephmas, Jeckyl
  • Re: Josephmas, Dono
• Time dilation reduces speed, Peri of Pera
  • Re: Time dilation reduces speed, Jeckyl
  • Re: Time dilation reduces speed, Dono
    • Re: Time dilation reduces speed, Peri of Pera
      • Re: Time dilation reduces speed, Jeckyl
  • Re: Time dilation reduces speed, Sue...
    • Re: Time dilation reduces speed, Jeckyl
• "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?", Cino
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?", Cino
• on-line courtesy, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: on-line courtesy, Bill Hobba
    • Re: on-line courtesy, Martin Hogbin
    • Re: on-line courtesy, Bryan Olson
  • Re: on-line courtesy, Androcles
    • Re: on-line courtesy, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: on-line courtesy, Eric Gisse
  • Re: on-line courtesy, George Hammond
• SR: how well proved it really is, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: how well proved it really is, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: how well proved it really is, Bill Hobba
  • Message not available
    • Re: SR: how well proved it really is, Bryan Olson
      • Re: SR: how well proved it really is, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: SR: how well proved it really is, Bryan Olson
      • Re: SR: how well proved it really is, Jeckyl
      • Re: SR: how well proved it really is, Tom Roberts
      • Re: SR: how well proved it really is, Bill Hobba
      • Re: SR: how well proved it really is, Androcles
      • Re: SR: how well proved it really is, Tom Roberts
      • Message not available
      • Re: SR: how well proved it really is, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: SR: how well proved it really is, Androcles
  • Re: how well proved it really is, Jeckyl
  • Message not available
    • Re: SR: how well proved it really is, Jeckyl
  • Re: SR: how well proved it really is, Dono
• Replies on SR, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Replies on SR, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Replies on SR, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
    • Message not available
      • Re: Replies on SR, Androcles
  • Re: Replies on SR, Bryan Olson
    • Re: Replies on SR, Androcles
• What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, THE_ONE
  • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, THE_ONE
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Randy Poe
  • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
    • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
    • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Dono
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Daily Nostrums
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
    • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, THE_ONE
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
  • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Martin Hogbin
  • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, RP
  • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
    • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, kenseto
  • Message not available
    • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
  • Message not available
    • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Randy Poe
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Dono
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Androcles
      • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Jeckyl
  • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, Sue...
  • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, John C . Polasek
  • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
  • Message not available
    • Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?, PD
• a few questions about SR and its adherents, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Eric Gisse
    • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Bill Hobba
  • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Sue...
  • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Koobee Wublee
    • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Dono
  • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Bryan Olson
    • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Jeckyl
  • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Juan R.
  • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Tom Roberts
    • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Bill Hobba
      • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Sue...
    • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Eric Gisse
      • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Eric Gisse
  • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Androcles
  • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Alen
    • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents, Androcles
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, Pmb
  • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, ivlova
    • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, ivlova
      • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, Dono
      • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, ivlova
      • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, Dono
      • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, ivlova
      • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, Dono
      • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, ivlova
      • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, Dono
      • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, ivlova
      • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, Dono
      • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, ivlova
      • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA, Pmb
• "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", Cino
• A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Craig Franck
  • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Androcles
      • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Androcles
      • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Jeckyl
      • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Sancho's Atomic Trousers
  • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Androcles
    • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Androcles
      • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Jeckyl
      • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, George Hammond
      • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Androcles
      • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Jeckyl
      • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Sue...
    • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Sancho's Atomic Trousers
  • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, George Hammond
    • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Jeckyl
      • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, George Hammond
      • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Jeckyl
      • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, George Hammond
  • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Martin Hogbin
    • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Androcles
      • Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity, Jeckyl
• Statement of Purpose Space Masters, faizabedin
  • Re: Statement of Purpose Space Masters, xxein
• Is Global Warming Caused By Man?, Cino
  • Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?, xxein
  • Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?, vanep
  • Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?, JanPB
• "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Cino
• Re: Special Relativity paradox?, Don Stockbauer
• What happens to this laser with SR?, David
  • Re: What happens to this laser with SR?, Sue...
  • Re: What happens to this laser with SR?, PD
    • Re: What happens to this laser with SR?, David
    • Re: What happens to this laser with SR?, Androcles
      • Re: What happens to this laser with SR?, PD
      • Re: What happens to this laser with SR?, Androcles
      • Re: What happens to this laser with SR?, PD
      • Re: What happens to this laser with SR?, Androcles
• johnreed - take 24 - super electromagnetism, johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: how could relativity and other photoelectric systems had been published without any lab work in order to provide the proof to my people?, PD
  • Message not available
    • Re: how could relativity and other photoelectric systems had been published without any lab work in order to provide the proof to my people?, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: how could relativity and other photoelectric systems had been published without any lab work in order to provide the proof to my people?, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: how could relativity and other photoelectric systems had been published without any lab work in order to provide the proof to my people?, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: how could relativity and other photoelectric systems had been published without any lab work in order to provide the proof to my people?, PD
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: how could relativity and other photoelectric systems had been published without any lab work in order to provide the proof to my people?, Dono
• Re: how can relativity predict parallel universes when if real parallel we never know because they never intersect?, Randy Poe
  • Message not available
    • Re: how can relativity predict parallel universes when if real parallel we never know because they never intersect?, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: how can relativity predict parallel universes when if real parallel we never know because they never intersect?, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: how can relativity predict parallel universes when if real parallel we never know because they never intersect?, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: how can relativity predict parallel universes when if real parallel we never know because they never intersect?, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: how can relativity predict parallel universes when if real parallel we never know because they never intersect?, Randy Poe
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets", Cino
• Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, ivlova
  • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, Dono
    • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, ivlova
      • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, Don Stockbauer
      • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, Dono
      • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, takecool
      • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, Dono
      • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, ivlova
      • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, ivlova
      • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, Jeckyl
      • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, takecool
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized, ivlova
• Re: New & Improved Relativity Paradox...???, The Translucent Amoebae
• relativity and permanence, VinegarTasters@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: relativity and permanence, Jeckyl
  • Re: relativity and permanence, dlzc
• Great Scientists and Sheep, Peri of Pera
  • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Don Stockbauer
    • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Androcles
  • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Jeckyl
  • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, dlzc
    • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Androcles
  • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Androcles
  • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, harry
    • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Shubee
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Randy Poe
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Shubee
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, harry
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Shubee
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Juan R.
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, shuba
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Dono
    • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Peri of Pera
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, harry
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Sue...
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Jeckyl
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Peri of Pera
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Jeckyl
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Jeckyl
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, harry
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Peri of Pera
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Sue...
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Jeckyl
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Peri of Pera
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Jeckyl
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Peri of Pera
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Jeckyl
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Jeckyl
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Peri of Pera
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Jeckyl
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Jeckyl
  • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, PD
    • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Jeckyl
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, PD
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Great Scientists and Sheep, PD
• I can do that!, PD
  • Re: I can do that!, Androcles
    • Re: I can do that!, Jeckyl
  • Re: I can do that!, harry
• "The Nature of Mass", Cino
• Re: Magnetic Field During Motion, Simple Simon
  • Re: Magnetic Field During Motion, mL
    • Re: Magnetic Field During Motion, mL
• SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, David
  • Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Dono
    • Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Tom Roberts
  • Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Sue...
    • Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Jeckyl
  • Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Randy Poe
    • Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Androcles
      • Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Jeckyl
  • Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, PD
    • Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, David
      • Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, PD
    • Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Randy Poe
      • Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Tom Roberts
      • Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Randy Poe
      • Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help, Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, John Kennaugh
  • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, John Kennaugh
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Eric Gisse
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, John Kennaugh
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, John Kennaugh
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, harry
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, John Kennaugh
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, harry
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Sue...
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jerry
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Sue...
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Sue...
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, John Kennaugh
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, harry
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, John Kennaugh
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, John Kennaugh
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jerry
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, John Kennaugh
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, John Kennaugh
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, bz
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, bz
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jerry
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, John Kennaugh
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
  • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Tom Roberts
    • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Androcles
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
    • Message not available
      • Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY, Jeckyl
• "Sakharov's induced gravity: a modern perspective", Sue...
  • Re: "Sakharov's induced gravity: a modern perspective", Sancho's Atomic Trousers
    • Re: "Sakharov's induced gravity: a modern perspective", Sue...
  • Re: "Sakharov's induced gravity: a modern perspective", kenseto
    • Re: "Sakharov's induced gravity: a modern perspective", Eric Gisse
• Hi to ALL. I just join this group., cletaarman@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Hi to ALL. I just join this group., Pmb
    • Re: Hi to ALL. I just join this group., Sancho's Atomic Trousers
      • Re: Hi to ALL. I just join this group., Sancho's Atomic Trousers
      • Re: Hi to ALL. I just join this group., Sancho's Atomic Trousers
  • Re: Hi to ALL. I just join this group., Sancho's Atomic Trousers
• "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Irev
  • Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Sancho's Atomic Trousers
• Re: most posters here never did physics for real, modeling investigations and stuff, i think i will leave, Jeckyl
• "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether", Irev
• This group is a good place to sleep, Sancho's Atomic Trousers
  • Re: This group is a good place to sleep, Don Stockbauer
    • Re: This group is a good place to sleep, Harold Saxon
      • Re: This group is a good place to sleep, atomik . fungus
      • Re: This group is a good place to sleep, Sancho's Atomic Trousers
      • Re: This group is a good place to sleep, Sancho's Atomic Trousers
    • Re: This group is a good place to sleep, Sancho's Atomic Trousers
• "Corrections to Special Relativity", Irev
  • Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity", Igor
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?", Pmb
• Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Juan R.
  • Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Bill Hobba
  • Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Juan R.
    • Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Juan R.
      • Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Juan R.
      • Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Juan R.
      • Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Dono
      • Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Juan R.
  • Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons, Juan R.
• "The Flaw in High Energy Physics", Irev
• Solar-Moon eclipse anomaly solution, based on Solar dark energy lensing., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Solar-Moon eclipse anomaly solution, based on Solar dark energy lensing., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Solar-Moon eclipse anomaly solution, based on Solar dark energy lensing., Eric Gisse
      • Re: Solar-Moon eclipse anomaly solution, based on Solar dark energy lensing., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Solar-Moon eclipse anomaly solution, based on Solar dark energy lensing., Eric Gisse
• Evren ; Bir varmış bir yokmuş gibi yaşar.!, resneli
• "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity", Irev
  • Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity", Don Stockbauer
    • Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity", bernardZ
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity", Irev
• design of ic engine, bhargava
  • Re: design of ic engine, Jeckyl
    • Re: design of ic engine, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: design of ic engine, Sue...
  • Re: design of ic engine, Abonito
• Running machine with an ic engine, bhargava
  • Re: Running machine with an ic engine, Abonito
• Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?, John Jones
  • Re: Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?, oriel36
      • Re: Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?, oriel36
      • Re: Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?, oriel36
  • Re: Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?, Tom Roberts
• Re: God is a Curva?, Pmb
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: God is a Curva?, Pmb
    • Re: God is a Curva?, Jeckyl
      • Re: God is a Curva?, Pmb
      • Re: God is a Curva?, Jeckyl
      • Re: God is a Curva?, Pmb
      • Re: God is a Curva?, Jeckyl
      • Re: God is a Curva?, Pmb
      • Re: God is a Curva?, Jeckyl
      • Re: God is a Curva?, Pmb
      • Re: God is a Curva?, Jeckyl
      • Re: God is a Curva?, shuba
      • Re: G