sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Ugh, Another Frame Drag Question?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Ugh, Another Frame Drag Question?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Ugh, Another Frame Drag Question?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Bad at Math
  • From: Niblick
• Re: Bad at Math
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: What are physicists trying to do?
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Bad at Math
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Bad at Math
  • From: golfmyball
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The speed of light is neither constant nor variable
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What are physicists trying to do?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• "The Creation of a Universe and the Gravity Transformations"
  • From: Mret
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: SR & irreversible processes
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR & perpendicular motion
  • From: David
• Re: SR & irreversible processes
  • From: David
• Re: The speed of light is neither constant nor variable
  • From: dlzc
• Re: What are physicists trying to do?
  • From: Daily Nostrums
• Re: Quiz
  • From: adam . trepczynski
• Re: The speed of light is neither constant nor variable
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The speed of light is neither constant nor variable
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The speed of light is neither constant nor variable
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The speed of light is neither constant nor variable
  • From: Kapowski
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Alen
• Re: What are physicists trying to do?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What are physicists trying to do?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The speed of light is neither constant nor variable
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What are physicists trying to do?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• The speed of light is neither constant nor variable
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Quiz
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What are physicists trying to do?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: M'I-5 P ersecution Harassm ent th rough the Rad io
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Quiz
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Quiz
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Flat => Curved Spacetime
  • From: xxein
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What are physicists trying to do?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What are physicists trying to do?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What are physicists trying to do?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What are physicists trying to do?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What are physicists trying to do?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Dono
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tansverse mass
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Tansverse mass
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Alen
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Alen
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Alen
• Re: What are physicists trying to do?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Quiz
  • From: adam . trepczynski
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Dono
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Dono
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What are physicists trying to do?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Dono
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Quiz
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: What are physicists trying to do?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Dono
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Quiz
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What are physicists trying to do?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Dono
• What are physicists trying to do?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Dono
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Dono
• Re: Quiz
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Alen
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Quiz
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Quiz
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Quiz
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Flat => Curved Spacetime
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Dark energy: the decade ahead (12 screens, 7 sketches)
  • From: Factotum
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: PD
• johnreed Take 24 - What is Super Electromagnetic 'Gravitation'?
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electromagnetic Universe?
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Tansverse mass
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Tansverse mass
  • From: Pmb
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: SR & perpendicular motion
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Daily Nostrums
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dono
• "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Tuo
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: bernardZ
• INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON OPTICAL SUPERCOMPUTING
  • From: optical . supercomputing
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Dono
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Tansverse mass
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Tansverse mass
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Tuo
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: Androcles
• Re: after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Att of Tom Roberts
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR & irreversible processes
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR & irreversible processes
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Fallacious Notion of Spacetime Continuum in Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tansverse mass
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Tansverse mass
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
  • From: G
• Re: after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: SR & perpendicular motion
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: SR & perpendicular motion
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: SR & perpendicular motion
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SR & irreversible processes
  • From: dlzc
• Re: after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page
  • From: Dono
• Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• after the logical refutation: what next?
  • From: gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page
  • From: Dono
• Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR & perpendicular motion
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR & perpendicular motion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• SR & perpendicular motion
  • From: David
• Re: SR & irreversible processes
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Tuo
• SR & irreversible processes
  • From: David
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: Dono
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: bernardZ
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: 5 reasons why Godels incompleteness theorem invalid
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: 5 reasons why Godels incompleteness theorem invalid
  • From: xxein
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: 5 reasons why Godels incompleteness theorem invalid
  • From: dlzc
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: dlzc
• Re: 5 reasons why Godels incompleteness theorem invalid
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet)
  • From: Dono
• 5 reasons why Godels incompleteness theorem invalid
  • From: elsiemelsi
• Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet)
  • From: Rob
• Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: I am confused by relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet)
  • From: Rob
• Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page
  • From: Dono
• Re: I am confused by relativity
  • From: maxwell
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: shuba
• Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: dlzc
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Twins travel effect
  • From: Dono
• "Gravity"
  • From: Tuo
• Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet)
  • From: Dono
• Re: Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: dlzc
• Frame Dragging results from Stanford ?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: why they give no nobels anymore for all the new modern theories ?
  • From: fungus
• Re: why they give no nobels anymore for all the new modern theories ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• why they give no nobels anymore for all the new modern theories ?
  • From: fungus
• why they give no nobels anymore for all the new modern theories ?
  • From: fungus
• Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet)
  • From: rob
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twins travel effect
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: bernardZ
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: shuba
• Re: Twins travel effect
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twins travel effect
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twins travel effect
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twins travel effect
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: the logical refutation
  • From: gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation reduces speed
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• the logical refutation
  • From: gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twins travel effect
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Time dilation reduces speed
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Twins travel effect
  • From: xxein
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Twins travel effect
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twins travel effect
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twins travel effect
  • From: roberto neves
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twins travel effect
  • From: roberto neves
• Re: Twins travel effect
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twins travel effect
  • From: Dono
• Twins travel effect
  • From: roberto neves
• Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Dono
• Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page
  • From: shuba
• Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page
  • From: Dono
• Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet)
  • From: Dono
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Tuo
• "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Tuo
• Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: I am confused by relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet)
  • From: Rob
• Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page
  • From: Dono
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet)
  • From: Dono
• Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet)
  • From: Dono
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet)
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Time dilation reduces speed
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: I am confused by relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page
  • From: xxein
• Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page
  • From: xxein
• Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page
  • From: shuba
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page
  • From: Dono
• Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page
  • From: shuba
• Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page
  • From: shuba
• Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page
  • From: Dono
• Re: Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page
  • From: Juan R.
• Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Dono
• Re: I am confused by relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Should we admit anti-space if we admit anti-matter?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Should we admit anti-space if we admit anti-matter?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: I am confused by relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time dilation reduces speed
  • From: Sue...
• Derivation of E=MC^2? (Not another wacko thread...yet)
  • From: rob
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: shuba
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Josephmas
  • From: Dono
• Re: Josephmas
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Josephmas
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time dilation reduces speed
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Time dilation reduces speed
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: Jeckyl
• Time dilation reduces speed
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: ivlova
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Dono
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SR: how well proved it really is
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: SR: how well proved it really is
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SR: how well proved it really is
  • From: Androcles
• "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Cino
• "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Cino
• Re: SR: how well proved it really is
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: Dono
• Re: SR: how well proved it really is
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SR: how well proved it really is
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: ivlova
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: ivlova
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: on-line courtesy
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: SR: how well proved it really is
  • From: Androcles
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: SR: how well proved it really is
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SR: how well proved it really is
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: how well proved it really is
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: on-line courtesy
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: on-line courtesy
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: on-line courtesy
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR: how well proved it really is
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: Alen
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: Pmb
• Re: SR: how well proved it really is
  • From: gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR: how well proved it really is
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Replies on SR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Replies on SR
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: ivlova
• Re: Replies on SR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: on-line courtesy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: on-line courtesy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: on-line courtesy
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: Sue...
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Androcles
• Re: how well proved it really is
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• on-line courtesy
  • From: gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Replies on SR
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: how well proved it really is
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Replies on SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• SR: how well proved it really is
  • From: gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Androcles
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: RP
• Replies on SR
  • From: gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: Dono
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: ivlova
• Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: Dono
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: Dono
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: Juan R.
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Cino
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: Eric Gisse
• What is the " ACTUAL " length ?
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: ivlova
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: Sue...
• Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Sue...
• a few questions about SR and its adherents
  • From: gharnett@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized
  • From: ivlova
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: ivlova
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Androcles
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized
  • From: takecool
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: John Kennaugh
• "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Cino
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: Sancho's Atomic Trousers
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: Sancho's Atomic Trousers
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: harry
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: vanep
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Statement of Purpose Space Masters
  • From: xxein
• Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: xxein
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: shuba
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: G
• Re: What happens to this laser with SR?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• A multi-stage rocket and relativity
  • From: Craig Franck
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: bz
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: What happens to this laser with SR?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What happens to this laser with SR?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What happens to this laser with SR?
  • From: PD
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What happens to this laser with SR?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Statement of Purpose Space Masters
  • From: faizabedin
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: bz
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: Cino
• "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Cino
• Re: What happens to this laser with SR?
  • From: David
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: What happens to this laser with SR?
  • From: PD
• Re: What happens to this laser with SR?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity paradox?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: John Kennaugh
• What happens to this laser with SR?
  • From: David
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: harry
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized
  • From: ivlova
• Re: how could relativity and other photoelectric systems had been published without any lab work in order to provide the proof to my people?
  • From: Dono
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• johnreed - take 24 - super electromagnetism
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Shubee
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: how could relativity and other photoelectric systems had been published without any lab work in order to provide the proof to my people?
  • From: PD
• Re: how could relativity and other photoelectric systems had been published without any lab work in order to provide the proof to my people?
  • From: PD
• Re: how can relativity predict parallel universes when if real parallel we never know because they never intersect?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: how can relativity predict parallel universes when if real parallel we never know because they never intersect?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: how could relativity and other photoelectric systems had been published without any lab work in order to provide the proof to my people?
  • From: PD
• Re: how could relativity and other photoelectric systems had been published without any lab work in order to provide the proof to my people?
  • From: PD
• Re: how can relativity predict parallel universes when if real parallel we never know because they never intersect?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: how can relativity predict parallel universes when if real parallel we never know because they never intersect?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: how can relativity predict parallel universes when if real parallel we never know because they never intersect?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: how could relativity and other photoelectric systems had been published without any lab work in order to provide the proof to my people?
  • From: PD
• Re: how can relativity predict parallel universes when if real parallel we never know because they never intersect?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: PD
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized
  • From: ivlova
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized
  • From: Dono
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: harry
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: harry
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized
  • From: takecool
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized
  • From: Dono
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: PD
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Cino
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Shubee
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: takecool
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized
  • From: ivlova
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Sue...
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jerry
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Magnetic Field During Motion
  • From: mL
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: harry
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized
  • From: Dono
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized
  • From: ivlova
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: G
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Magnetic Field During Motion
  • From: mL
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: New & Improved Relativity Paradox...???
  • From: The Translucent Amoebae
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Dono
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Dono
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: G
• Re: I can do that!
  • From: harry
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: PD
• Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Shubee
• Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help
  • From: PD
• Re: relativity and permanence
  • From: dlzc
• Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help
  • From: David
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Cino
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: harry
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: relativity and permanence
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• relativity and permanence
  • From: VinegarTasters@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: harry
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: God is a Curva?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: God is a Curva?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help
  • From: PD
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Great Scientists and Sheep
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: God is a Curva?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: God is a Curva?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: I can do that!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: God is a Curva?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: God is a Curva?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: God is a Curva?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: God is a Curva?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Androcles
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: PD
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: PD
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: I can do that!
  • From: Androcles
• I can do that!
  • From: PD
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Cino
• Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Magnetic Field During Motion
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: "Sakharov's induced gravity: a modern perspective"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: God is a Curva?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help
  • From: Dono
• Re: "Sakharov's induced gravity: a modern perspective"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• SR Velocity Composition formula - Gurus please help
  • From: David
• Re: "Sakharov's induced gravity: a modern perspective"
  • From: kenseto
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: God is a Curva?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Hi to ALL. I just join this group.
  • From: Sancho's Atomic Trousers
• Re: Hi to ALL. I just join this group.
  • From: Sancho's Atomic Trousers
• Re: Hi to ALL. I just join this group.
  • From: Sancho's Atomic Trousers
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Hi to ALL. I just join this group.
  • From: Sancho's Atomic Trousers
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Sancho's Atomic Trousers
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "Sakharov's induced gravity: a modern perspective"
  • From: Sancho's Atomic Trousers
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: This group is a good place to sleep
  • From: Sancho's Atomic Trousers
• Re: This group is a good place to sleep
  • From: Sancho's Atomic Trousers
• Re: This group is a good place to sleep
  • From: Sancho's Atomic Trousers
• Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: John Park
• Re: God is a Curva?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: God is a Curva?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: God is a Curva?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: God is a Curva?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Hi to ALL. I just join this group.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• "Sakharov's induced gravity: a modern perspective"
  • From: Sue...
• Hi to ALL. I just join this group.
  • From: cletaarman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: John Park
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Dono
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Dono
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Irev
• Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: most posters here never did physics for real, modeling investigations and stuff, i think i will leave
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: most posters here never did physics for real, modeling investigations and stuff, i think i will leave
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: most posters here never did physics for real, modeling investigations and stuff, i think i will leave
  • From: Dono
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: John Park
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: bz
• Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: This group is a good place to sleep
  • From: atomik . fungus
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: This group is a good place to sleep
  • From: Harold Saxon
• "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Irev
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: This group is a good place to sleep
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Androcles
• This group is a good place to sleep
  • From: Sancho's Atomic Trousers
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Jerry
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Jerry
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: AKGMJC
• Re: Solar-Moon eclipse anomaly solution, based on Solar dark energy lensing.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Igor
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: John Park
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Irev
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: bz
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Alen
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Solar-Moon eclipse anomaly solution, based on Solar dark energy lensing.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: srwenner
• Re: Solar-Moon eclipse anomaly solution, based on Solar dark energy lensing.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Alen
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Solar-Moon eclipse anomaly solution, based on Solar dark energy lensing.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Relativistic electrodynamics without photons
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: bz
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Relativistic electrodynamics without photons
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: bz
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Fallacious Notion of Spacetime Continuum in Relativity
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Alen
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: srwenner
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• Re: Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: Irev
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: mluttgens
• Solar-Moon eclipse anomaly solution, based on Solar dark energy lensing.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: design of ic engine
  • From: Abonito
• Re: Running machine with an ic engine
  • From: Abonito
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity passes most stringent tests yet
  • From: harry
• Evren ; Bir varmış bir yokmuş gibi yaşar.!
  • From: resneli
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: bernardZ
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: AKGMJC
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: John Park
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: dlzc
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity passes most stringent tests yet
  • From: shuba
• Re: Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: AKGMJC
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: AKGMJC
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: AKGMJC
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: AKGMJC
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Laurent
• Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Irev
• "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Irev
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: design of ic engine
  • From: Sue...
• Re: design of ic engine
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: PD
• Re: how powerful is the geometry of attraction into a black hole?
  • From: Sancho's Atomic Trousers
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: AKGMJC
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativity passes most stringent tests yet
  • From: harry
• Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: design of ic engine
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: John Park
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• design of ic engine
  • From: bhargava
• Running machine with an ic engine
  • From: bhargava
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: srwenner
• Re: Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The equivalence of Euclidean and noneuclidean spaces
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity passes most stringent tests yet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Relativity passes most stringent tests yet
  • From: shuba
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Principle of Relativity
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Is infinite Euclidean space non-euclidean?
  • From: John Jones
• Re: The equivalence of Euclidean and noneuclidean spaces
  • From: John Jones
• Re: The equivalence of Euclidean and noneuclidean spaces
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Principle of Relativity
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: most posters here never did physics for real, modeling investigations and stuff, i think i will leave
  • From: Igor
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: AKGMJC
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• "Gravity"
  • From: Irev
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: bz
• Re: Principle of Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Principle of Relativity
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity passes most stringent tests yet
  • From: harry
• Re: most posters here never did physics for real, modeling investigations and stuff, i think i will leave
  • From: Dono
• Re: most posters here never did physics for real, modeling investigations and stuff, i think i will leave
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: most posters here never did physics for real, modeling investigations and stuff, i think i will leave
  • From: PD
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: bz
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: harry
• Re: Principle of Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: what is the evaporating temperature of water?
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Principle of Relativity
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Principle of Relativity
  • From: RP
• Re: God is a Curva?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Principle of Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The equivalence of Euclidean and noneuclidean spaces
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Principle of Relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The equivalence of Euclidean and noneuclidean spaces
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Relativity passes most stringent tests yet
  • From: RLG
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: mL
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: JanPB
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: srwenner
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Principle of Relativity
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonestplagerist,
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: most posters here never did physics for real, modeling investigations and stuff, i think i will leave
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The equivalence of Euclidean and noneuclidean spaces
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The equivalence of Euclidean and noneuclidean spaces
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: is relativity destroing terminologies and languages or is been done before?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Sue...
• The equivalence of Euclidean and noneuclidean spaces
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Principle of Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Androcles
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites
  • From: Androcles
• Re: is relativity destroing terminologies and languages or is been done before?
  • From: Igor
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Trans-Dimensional Theory
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Principle of Relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: srwenner
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: David
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• "Gravity"
  • From: Sptth
• Re: Principle of Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonestplagerist,
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Resubmitting Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Principle of Relativity
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Principle of Relativity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Resubmitting Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Principle of Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: AKGMJC
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Trans-Dimensional Theory
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: what is the evaporating temperature of water?
  • From: bhargava
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: srwenner
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: srwenner
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: maxwell
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Yet another Sagnac animation.
  • From: bz
• Re: what is the evaporating temperature of water?
  • From: bz
• Re: what is the evaporating temperature of water?
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Yet another Sagnac animation.
  • From: YBM
• Re: what is the evaporating temperature of water?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Trans-Dimensional Theory
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Re: Trans-Dimensional Theory
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Re: Yet another Sagnac animation.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: fungus
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: Igor
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: what is the evaporating temperature of water?
  • From: bz
• Re: what is the evaporating temperature of water?
  • From: fungus
• Re: what is the evaporating temperature of water?
  • From: RP
• Re: is relativity destroing terminologies and languages or is been done before?
  • From: conducter
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: is relativity destroing terminologies and languages or is been done before?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: what is the evaporating temperature of water?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: is relativity destroing terminologies and languages or is been done before?
  • From: Randy Poe
• is relativity destroing terminologies and languages or is been done before?
  • From: conducter
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Sptth
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: what is the evaporating temperature of water?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: AKGMJC
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Androcles
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: what is the evaporating temperature of water?
  • From: bz
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: maxwell
• what is the evaporating temperature of water?
  • From: bhargava
• Re: how powerful is the geometry of attraction into a black hole?
  • From: bhargava
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: conducter
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: conducter
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Fallacious Notion of Spacetime Continuum in Relativity
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: drhorton
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Trans-Dimensional Theory
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Trans-Dimensional Theory
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Trans-Dimensional Theory
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• these selfestablished phylosophs in this thread here needs a computer program help them not to read
  • From: scratch
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: scratch
• Re: Yet another Sagnac animation.
  • From: bz
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: PD
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonestplagerist,
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: Androcles
• Wavelength & Frequency experiments for SR
  • From: David
• Re: Fallacious Notion of Spacetime Continuum in Relativity
  • From: GSS
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dono
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonestplagerist,
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonestplagerist,
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonestplagerist,
  • From: J.Smas2777
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonestplagerist,
  • From: Pmb
• "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Sptth
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonestplagerist,
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: harry
• Re: The Voice of Hurricanes
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: harry
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Was Einstein the most ignorant, immoral, stupid, dishonest plagerist,
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Yet another Sagnac animation.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: bz
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dono
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: scratch
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: scratch
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: scratch
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: scratch
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: alt.geek
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: Daniel Pitts
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Erk's Relativity Book ( www.relativitybook.com )
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: srwenner
• THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: scratch
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: bz
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: scratch
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: alt.geek
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?
  • From: scratch
• Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?
  • From: scratch
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: scratch
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: bz
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: dlzc
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR? (second part)
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Fallacious Notion of Spacetime Continuum in Relativity
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: srwenner
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: srwenner
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: srwenner
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: srwenner
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: JMA
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Zero Time Conundrum
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: THREE PROBLEMS FOR MATH AND SCIENCE (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: JMA
• Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?
  • From: PD
• Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?
  • From: scratch
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: dr_strangelove
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?
  • From: PD
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?
  • From: scratch
• Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?
  • From: PD
• Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?
  • From: scratch
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: scratch
• Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?
  • From: scratch
• Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?
  • From: PD
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Cosmik de Bris
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Androcles
• how can they predict black holes when black holes divide spacetime by zero, which is impossible to do?
  • From: scratch
• Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?
  • From: scratch
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: what gives absence of vacuum
  • From: scratch
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: maxwell
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Fallacious Notion of Spacetime Continuum in Relativity
  • From: GSS
• Re: Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: how powerful is the geometry of attraction into a black hole?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Frame question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: ///// *♥*Honey Moon Sex Videos**Live Cam Sex *♥* \\\\\
  • From: bhargava
• Re: how powerful is the geometry of attraction into a black hole?
  • From: bhargava
• Re: what gives absence of vacuum
  • From: bhargava
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: PD
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: JMA
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: is relativity contra revolutionary?
  • From: PD
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Frame question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: how does the information of being attracted excape a black hole?
  • From: scratch
• is relativity contra revolutionary?
  • From: scratch
• Re: how does the information of being attracted excape a black hole?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: harry
• how does the information of being attracted excape a black hole?
  • From: scratch
• Re: how powerful is the geometry of attraction into a black hole?
  • From: scratch
• Re: what gives absence of vacuum
  • From: scratch
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: PD
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: JMA
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: harry
• Re: SR & optical properties
  • From: David
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: PD
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: JMA
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Fallacious Notion of Spacetime Continuum in Relativity
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: GSS
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Simon G Best
• Re: SR & optical properties
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Simon G Best
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Simon G Best
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Sptth
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: PD
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: Sancho's Atomic Trousers
• Re: how powerful is the geometry of attraction into a black hole?
  • From: Sancho's Atomic Trousers
• Re: what gives absence of vacuum
  • From: Sancho's Atomic Trousers
• Re: ///// *♥*Honey Moon Sex Videos**Live Cam Sex *♥* \\\\\
  • From: Sancho's Atomic Trousers
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Juan R.
• Resubmitting Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Physical interpretation in physics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Question about time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Frame question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about time dilation
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Question about time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Question about time dilation
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about time dilation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Question about time dilation
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: friction from vacuum
  • From: bhargava
• Re: friction from vacuum
  • From: bhargava
• Re: what gives absence of vacuum
  • From: bhargava
• Re: Frame question
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: JMA
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: what are they using to describe evolution other than partial differential equations?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: relativity predict eternal motion
  • From: PD
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• what are they using to describe evolution other than partial differential equations?
  • From: jolt
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity predict eternal motion
  • From: jolt
• Re: relativity predict eternal motion
  • From: PD
• how powerful is the geometry of attraction into a black hole?
  • From: jolt
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: relativity predict eternal motion
  • From: jolt
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: JMA
• Re: relativity predict eternal motion
  • From: PD
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• what gives absence of vacuum
  • From: boho
• friction from vacuum
  • From: boho
• relativity predict eternal motion
  • From: boho
• Re: Simon G Best
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: JMA
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Simon G Best
• Re: Question about time dilation
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Simon G Best
• Re: SR & optical properties
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sptth
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Simon G Best
  • From: Simon G Best
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR & optical properties
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Question about time dilation
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• SR & optical properties
  • From: David
• Re: Relic neutrinos
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Relic neutrinos
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Juan R.
• Simon G Best
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: K_h
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Frame question
  • From: dlzc
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Frame question
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: srwenner
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• California Moving Companies Los Angeles Movers 323-678-2704
  • From: movers
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Is It Worth Asking Real Questions Here?
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: mL
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Igor
• Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Evig
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Dono
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dono
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: harry
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is It Worth Asking Real Questions Here?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is It Worth Asking Real Questions Here?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Question about time dilation
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How many dimensions are there?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• relativistic thermodynamics (temperature in inertial frames)
  • From: srwenner
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: how is speed of light constant when it can fly slower?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Question about time dilation
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: PD
• Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Calculazions within a inertial system.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Igor
• Re: how is speed of light constant when it can fly slower?
  • From: Igor
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Calculazions within a inertial system.
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• how is speed of light constant when it can fly slower?
  • From: rotten egg
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Evig
• Re: why they cant put their finger on it and say "look, this side is contracted"
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is It Worth Asking Real Questions Here?
  • From: coil
• Re: why they cant put their finger on it and say "look, this side is contracted"
  • From: coil
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Alen
• Galileo and Copernicus
  • From: oriel36
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Frame question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: why they cant put their finger on it and say "look, this side is contracted"
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Frame question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Dono
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: shalayka
• Is the LT for time correct?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Frame question
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Frame question
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: shalayka
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativity Allows Us To Measure Absolute Motion?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916, available online.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: why they cant put their finger on it and say "look, this side is contracted"
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Orbital precession w/o GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: bz