Is the LT for time correct?

When comparing the length of an object from 2
different IRFs, one must refer to the endpoints
of the object as locatable simultaneously.
In fact, it seems that, this can be done only in
one IRF at a time, i.e. in the frame where the
object is not moving.
For the moving frame we can not attach a
certain time value to the L' length , can we?
If not, then, this makes the Lorentz transformation
for time, in it known form, questionable, doesn't it?
;--))

Regards, LL
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is the LT for time correct?
    ... different IRFs, one must refer to the endpoints ... For the moving frame we can not attach a ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Is the LT for time correct?
    ... > different IRFs, one must refer to the endpoints ... > object is not moving. ... We can send radar signals to the endpoints of the moving ... but the (remote!) reflection events are simultaneous if ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Is the LT for time correct?
    ... different IRFs, one must refer to the endpoints ... object is not moving. ... We can send radar signals to the endpoints of the moving ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Is the LT for time correct?
    ... different IRFs, one must refer to the endpoints ... For the moving frame we can not attach a ... What's the matter Sue .. ... [snip more repeated copy-and-paste unrealted crap from ignorant Sue .. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Is the LT for time correct?
    ... different IRFs, one must refer to the endpoints ... For the moving frame we can not attach a ... in the second coordinate system we can not ... we may compare the distance of the points ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast