Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: colp <colp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 23:35:54 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 1, 1:29 pm, bz <bz+...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
colp <c...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote innews:caf344e3-e0e0-40dc-a6e3-06c0382cdac9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
On Nov 30, 10:36 pm, bz <bz+...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
colp <c...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
innews:0d8d2519-d996-4397-8506-5fa467cc2aa2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
:
That nonsense is the paradox that I am talking about. Facts from one
coordinate system do get mixed and matched with facts from other
coordinate systems. An example of the is clock synchronisation for
GPS sattelites.
But the logic and the math are only required to 'appear consistent'
under certain sets of circumstances.
I assume that you mean from within a single inertial frame of
reference.
Or follow the proper rules when changing frames.
What are the rules for determining time dilation when changing frames?
.
- References:
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- Prev by Date: Re: The real twin paradox.
- Next by Date: Re: Is the LT for time correct?
- Previous by thread: Re: The real twin paradox.
- Next by thread: Re: The real twin paradox.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|