Re: Is the LT for time correct?


"xray4abc" <lemhenyil@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:246b7283-4867-46c4-b27c-bfea2b2cbd24@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: When comparing the length of an object from 2
: different IRFs, one must refer to the endpoints
: of the object as locatable simultaneously.
: In fact, it seems that, this can be done only in
: one IRF at a time, i.e. in the frame where the
: object is not moving.
: For the moving frame we can not attach a
: certain time value to the L' length , can we?
: If not, then, this makes the Lorentz transformation
: for time, in it known form, questionable, doesn't it?
: ;--))


Correct. Einstein's twisted brain is apparent when he says
"the velocity of light in our theory plays the part, physically,
of an infinitely great velocity."
That is, he assumes the endpoints of the object are locatable
simultaneously when it suits him and not when it doesn't.

Catch 22:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img22.gif
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img76.gif


Heller wrote: "There was only one catch and that was Catch 22, which
specified that a concern for one's safety in the face of dangers that were
real and immediate was the process of a rational mind.
"Orr (a character in the novel) was crazy and could be grounded. All he had
to do was ask, and as soon as he did, he would no longer be crazy and would
have to fly more missions.

"Orr would be crazy to fly more missions and sane if he didn't, but if he
was sane he had to fly them. If he flew them he was crazy and didn't have
to; but if he didn't want to he was sane and had to."

In Einstein's case if you use c+v you can derive c = (c+v)/(1+v/c) from
the cuckoo malformations he blamed on Lorentz. That says you can't
use c+v.

What troll kooks like Schwartz, Poe, McCullough, Roberts, Draper, Lawrence,
Andersen, Nieminen, ewill, Olson, Tom & Jeery et. al. fail to realise is
the existence of isomorphism

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isomorphism

between Sagnac's real experiment and Einstein's hallucination experiment,
shown here:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/TwoSpeedRack.gif

Einstein sends light along the rack and back again, the rack
moving at velocity v in his pipe dream.

Sagnac sends the light around the gear wheel for real.
If you analyse one you should get the same result as the other, but
you cannot use SR to derive SR, that is petitio principii, circularity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question

c+v is essential to the derivation of the cuckoo malformations, the
part where Einstein screws up is:
'we establish by definition that the "time" required by
light to travel from A to B equals the "time" it requires
to travel from B to A' because I SAY SO. -- Rabbi Albert Einstein

http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Smart/tAB=tBA.gif

Here are some mathematical proofs:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_proof

Not included are
Proof by "because I say so",
Proof by "everybody knows",
Proof by "it is written",
the three most popular forms used in sci.physics.relativity.

You'll often see this pathetic mob muttering "Lorentz Transformations"
but they haven't a clue how they are derived and faithfully follow their
indoctrination like lemmings.

Catch 22:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img22.gif
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img76.gif

Prediction:
The troll kooks will ignore it, they are too stooopid to understand a
proof.

RULES OF REASONING IN PHILOSOPHY.

RULE I.
We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true
and sufficient to explain their appearances.

To this purpose the philosophers say that Nature does nothing in vain,
and more is in vain when less will serve; for Nature is pleased with
simplicity,
and affects not the pomp of superfluous causes.

-- Sir Isaac Newton










.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Contraction Dilemma
    ... |> I get your point but is this NG a pub or soccer game? ... "Orr was crazy and could be grounded. ... "Orr would be crazy to fly more missions and sane if he didn't, ... Einstein sends light along the rack and back again, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Relativity
    ... Does anyone really understand relativity? ... "Orr was crazy and could be grounded. ... "Orr would be crazy to fly more missions and sane if he didn't, ... Einstein sends light along the rack and back again, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Four mirror Sagnac
    ... :>: phase relationship) from the Sagnac experiment on not the other way ... I'm saying read what Einstein wrote, ... "Orr was crazy and could be grounded. ... "Orr would be crazy to fly more missions and sane if he didn't, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
    ... "Orr was crazy and could be grounded. ... "Orr would be crazy to fly more missions and sane if he didn't, ... Einstein sends light along the rack and back again, ... to travel from B to A' because I SAY SO. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Comment on Wikipedia entry: Simple inference of time dilation
    ... with the derivation. ... "Orr was crazy and could be grounded. ... "Orr would be crazy to fly more missions and sane if he didn't, ... Einstein sends light along the rack and back again, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)