Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 01:56:15 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 30, 7:29 pm, bz <bz+...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
BTW... There is a recent, well informed post on sci.physics.research
that discusses some of the causes of errors in the GPS.
I realise you would take the opposite view but it left me
no confidence that the 7us/day correction can be attributed
to predicted motional effects wrt earth. Even if a science
quality geostationary oscillator was avalible as we discussed
it might take a Ouji board to pull the signal out of the
system's phase noise.
Where is Tom Roberts with his error bars when ya need him? ;-)
The Sagnac interferometer at Wettzell
http://www.wettzell.i***.de/LKREISEL/G/LaserGyros.html
is now integrated with GPS so might be a good source of
data to settle that sort of issue without need for a dedicated
SV or heaven-forbid you and I have to take your 100Khz crystal
calibrator up there ourselves and show 'em how it's done. ;-)
Sue...
--.
bz
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- References:
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: bz
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- Prev by Date: Re: GR1916 question about g=1?
- Next by Date: Re: A challenge to Tom Roberts re LET,SR and an alternative.
- Previous by thread: Re: The real twin paradox.
- Next by thread: Re: The real twin paradox.
- Index(es):