Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: Dono <sa_ge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 09:10:20 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 30, 11:03 pm, colp <c...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 1, 6:58 pm, Bryan Olson <fakeaddr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
colp wrote:
Bryan Olson wrote:[...]
colp wrote:
What am I making up?
For their clocks to be the same time, A must have observed that B'sThat you made up. According to SR, A's change it frames will
time was compressed at some stage.
SR does not describe time compression.
result in A seeing B's age jump forward.
Wrong. SR has nothing to say about non-inertial frames.
Special relativity (SR) (aka the special theory of relativity) is the
physical theory of measurement in inertial frames of reference
proposed in 1905 by Albert Einstein in his article "On the
Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity
Reading the page you cite, we find:
Special relativity does not account for gravity, but
it can deal with accelerations.
How does special relativity deal with accelerations?
Cyclotron experiments have shown that, even at accelerations of 10^19
g (g = acceleration of gravity at the Earth's surface), clock rates
are unaffected. Only speed affects clock rates, but not acceleration
per se.
http://metaresearch.org/cosmology/gps-relativity.asp
http://physics.nmt.edu/~raymond/classes/ph13xbook/node59.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- References:
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: Bryan Olson
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- From: colp
- Re: The real twin paradox.
- Prev by Date: Re: Is the LT for time correct?
- Next by Date: Re: Is the LT for time correct?
- Previous by thread: Re: The real twin paradox.
- Next by thread: Re: The real twin paradox.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|