Re: GR1916 question about g=1?



On Nov 30, 2:56 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr.pi.nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:19:19 -0800 (PST), "Ken S. Tucker"

<dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Dono.

On Nov 29, 7:09 pm, Dono <sa...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 29, 11:10 am, "Ken S. Tucker"

<...>

http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/855/35092155.JPG

I'm on dial-up with images disabled,
so I was unable to access that link.
However, I guess you interested in how
GR accounts for Coulomb Force!

It doesn't, because GR is a theory of gravitation rather than
electromagnetism. E&M only enters into GR as source terms in the field
equations.

Hmmmmm. How does Mass and Length inter-convert
in GR?
Regards
Ken
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Four Precise Tests of General Relativity
    ... Eric Gisse wrote: ... The printed version will appear in Science. ... Do we even know the mass of the sun to 4 significant figures? ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: black holes made of light?
    ... On Oct 31, 8:26 am, Eric Gisse < necessary background material ... Ignorance is not a form of knowing things. ... Gr is wrong and nonsense physics ... physics is the science of MASS!! ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Is it our math letting us down?
    ... Eric Gisse wrote: ... is assigned to it is woefully short of what is needed to conserve mass ... assign to the neutrino still makes it virtually massless. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
    ... >> Eric Gisse wrote: ... >>> Mass is a unit of measure, it is not a dimension in the topological ... extensively in physics textbooks, you ought to read up on it. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Neutrino Mass and Supernovae
    ... Eric Gisse wrote: ... >>either be wrong or incomplete. ... amount of mass - about 30%! ...
    (sci.physics)

Quantcast