Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
- From: "Jeckyl" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:31:00 +1100
"harry" <harald.vanlintelButNotThis@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1197465260_5724@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yes indeed - rotation relative to what?
Any inertial frame in which the centre of rotation is at rest
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
- From: harry
- Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
- References:
- Physical interpretation in physics.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
- From: maxwell
- Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
- From: harry
- Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
- From: maxwell
- Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
- From: harry
- Physical interpretation in physics.
- Prev by Date: Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
- Next by Date: Solar-Moon eclipse anomaly solution, based on Solar dark energy lensing.
- Previous by thread: Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
- Next by thread: Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
- Index(es):
